journal article·2013-10

Time-domain fatigue assessment of ship side-shell structures

Zhiyuan Li, Jonas W. Ringsberg, Gaute Storhaug

Publisher page

Abstract

Loads acting on ship side-shell structures are complex and vary randomly over time. The current study proposes a direct calculation procedure for the fatigue assessment of ship side-shell structures. The calculation procedure is characterised by nonlinear time-domain hydrodynamic simulations followed by finite element (FE) analyses. Sensitivity and feasibility analyses of the proposed time-domain procedure were carried out, and the calculated fatigue damages were compared with full-scale measurements made on a container vessel. Fatigue life analyses were carried out by both the spectral method and the time-domain approach. In addition, two approaches for local stress analysis are presented and discussed: an engineering-based definition of the stress concentration factor (SCF) and a proposed local stress factor (LSF) that utilises stress ranges extracted from the stress history. The results from the fatigue analysis using the LSF indicated a shorter fatigue life than the results obtained using the SCF. This difference is observed because the LSF accounts for the effects of wave-induced loads under ship operation conditions in a more realistic manner.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Schulte-Strathaus, R. Bea, Fatigue database development and analysis, in: Project Report Number SMP-4, Structural Maintenance for New and Existing Ships, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering, UC Berkeley, 1991.
2. ClassNK, Comprehensive damage review of 2nd generation of VLCCs. ClassNK Casualty Review, 98CRH-001E, in, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, 1998.
3. Explanation for cracks in large container ships (in German)
4. Fatigue damage in the side shells of ships10.1016/0951-8339(94)00023-L ↗
5. Spectral fatigue damage calculation in the side shells of ships, with due account taken of the effect of alternating wet and dry areas10.1016/S0951-8339(98)00016-1 ↗
6. Berstad · 1999
7. Fatigue routing of container ships–assessment of contributions to fatigue damage from wave-induced torsion and horizontal and vertical bending10.1080/17445302.2011.559368 ↗
8. DNV, Classification Note No. 30.7: Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structure, Det Norske Veritas, 2010.
9. ABS, Guidance Notes on Spectral-based Fatigue Analysis for Vessels, American Bureau of Shipping, 2004.
10. IACS, Common Structural Rules for Bulk Carriers, International Association of Classification Societies, 2009.
11. Mao · 2010
12. Influence of weather routing on encountered wave heights
13. Hogben · 1986
14. Fatigue analysis of ship hulls under non-Gaussian wave loads10.1016/0951-8339(91)90007-X ↗
15. Long-term fatigue damage of ship structures under nonlinear wave loads
16. Z. Li, W. Mao, J. Ringsberg, E. Johnson, G. Storhaug, A comparative study of fatigue assessment of a container ship structure using various direct calculation approaches, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Maritime Technology, Harbin; China, 2012, pp. 405-409.
17. G. Storhaug, E. Moe, Measurements of wave induced vibrations onboard a large container vessel operating in harsh environment, in: 10th international symposium on practical design of ships and other floating structures, Houston; USA, 2007, pp. 64–72.
18. G. Storhaug, J. Mathisen, S.E. Heggelund, Model test and full scale measurements of whipping on container vessels in the North Atlantic, in: 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Hawaii; USA, 2009, pp. 51-62.10.1115/OMAE2009-79127 ↗
19. DNV, NAUTICUS Hull, User Manual, Section Scantlings, Hull section scantlings acc. to DNV/CSR Rules, in: DNV report no. 96-03110, Sept., Det norske veritas, 2006.
20. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system10.1002/qj.828 ↗
21. DNV, SESAM URL , in: Det Norske Veritas; 2013.
22. Motions in waves
23. DNV, SESAM user manual wasim: wave loads on vessels with forward speed, version 3.4., in, Det Norske Veritas; 2006.
24. DNV, recommended practice DNV-RP-C205: environmental conditions and environmental loads, in, Det Norske Veritas; 2010.
25. T.C. Fu, A.M. Fullerton, E.E. Hackett, C. Merrill, Shipboard Measurement of Ocean Waves, in: Proceedings of the ASME Thirtieth International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2011), Published on CD-ROM s., in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. June 19-24, 2011, 2011.
26. ABS. Guidance notes on spectral-based fatigue analysis for vessels (Updated 2009). In: American Bureau of Shipping; 2004.
27. IACS, Recommendation No.34: Standard Wave Data, in, International Association of Classification Societies, 2001.
28. DNV, SESAM User Manual Stofat: Fatigue Damage Calculation of Welded Plates and Shells, version 3.4, in, Det Norske Veritas, 2009.
29. G. Storhaug, IACS URS11 defines the dimensioning wave load for ship design, but what does it mean from a statistical point of view? Presentation in SEAMOCS meeting in Malta, 2009.
30. Sharp JV. Effect of uncertainties in predicted fatigue life on structural reliability, in: integrity of offshore structures–5. Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd., 339 Halesowen Rd., Cradley Heath, Warley, West Midlands B64 6PH, UK, Glasgow, UK; 1993. p. 215–34.
31. DNV, Classification note No. 34.2: plus – extended fatigue analysis of ship details, in, Det Norske Veritas; 2010.
32. Pilkey · 1997