Probabilistic fatigue life updating accounting for inspections of multiple critical locations
Source abstract
Abstract
Many steel structures contain multiple fatigue sensitive details that have similar geometries and are subjected to similar load fluctuations. Examples are orthotropic (bridge) decks and stiffened (ship) hulls where tens to thousands of similar details are present in one structure. Generally only visual inspections on fatigue cracks are considered for these structures because more accurate techniques are considered to be too expensive and time consuming when so many details need to be inspected. Visual inspections are known to have a low probability of detection. Consequently Bayesian update techniques usually show a marginal effect of the result of visual inspections on the reliability of structures with respect to fatigue failure. On the other hand the inspection result of one location also provides information on similar details at other locations and thus the significance of the inspection result may be larger if multiple potential crack locations occur and cracks are not detected at any of these locations. This paper provides a probabilistic fatigue crack growth (fracture mechanics) model of a system containing a fatigue sensitive detail at multiple locations that accounts for the results of inspections. Spatial correlations of loading, resistance, and uncertainty variables between the different locations are evaluated and estimated through a literature review and are accounted for in the model. The model is demonstrated on a practical example of an orthotropic bridge deck containing a detail at 100 locations. The paper shows that visual inspections may be effective provided that a certain minimum inspection reliability can be guaranteed, that the structure is relatively tolerant to large cracks, and that the geometry and loading conditions are similar for a large number of locations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. The physics of fatigue crack initiation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.009 ↗
2. Reliability-based management of inspection, maintenance and repair of offshore structures10.1080/15732470412331289314 ↗
3. Integration of structural health monitoring and fatigue damage prognosis10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.001 ↗
4. Uncertainty quantification and model validation of fatigue crack growth prediction10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.017 ↗
5. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using AFGROW and accounting for material variability10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.001 ↗
6. Hemez FM, Roberson AN, Rutherford AC. Uncertainty quantification and model validation for damage prognosis. In: Proc 4th int workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford: Stanford University; 2003, p. 575–82.
7. Risk based acceptance criteria for joints subjected to fatigue deterioration10.1115/1.1894412 ↗
8. Gregory · 2005
9. Madzen HO, Sørensen JD, Olesen R. Optimal inspection planning for fatigue damage of offshore structures. In: Proc. int. conf. on structural safety and reliability. San Fransisco: ICOSSAR; 1989, p. 2099–106.
10. Field implementation of RBI for jacket structures10.1115/1.1951777 ↗
11. A probabilistic-based airframe integrity management model10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.010 ↗
12. Statistical aspects of some fatigue crack growth data10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.019 ↗
13. Fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading, Part 1: experimental investigations10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00992.x ↗
14. Optimum inspection planning for minimizing fatigue damage detection delay of ship hull structures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.018 ↗
15. Probabilistic optimum inspection planning of steel bridges with multiple fatigue sensitive details10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.044 ↗
16. A recursive Bayesian framework for structural health management using online monitoring and periodic inspections10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.020 ↗
17. Paris · J Basic Eng · 1963 · 85 · 52810.1115/1.3656900 ↗
18. Forman · J Basic Eng · 1967 · 89 · 45910.1115/1.3609637 ↗
19. Newman JC Jr. A crack-closure model for predicting fatigue crack growth under aircraft spectrum loading. In: Methods and models for predicting fatigue crack growth under random loading, ASTM STP 748. Philadelphia: ASTM; 1981, p. 53–84.10.1520/STP28334S ↗
20. Model selection, updating, and averaging for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.03.006 ↗
21. Bayesian model updating and prognosis of fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.012 ↗
22. Fatigue reliability of a stiffened panel subjected to correlated crack growth10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.09.002 ↗
23. Sørensen JD, Ersdal G. Risk based inspection planning of ageing structures. In: Proc. OMAE’08, Estoril: ASME; 2008, p. 1–10.10.1115/OMAE2008-57404 ↗
24. Moan T, Song R. Implication of inspection updating on system fatigue reliability of offshore structures. In: Proc. OMAE’98. Lisbon: ASME; 1998.
25. Ayala-Uruga E, Moan T. System reliability issues of offshore structures considering fatigue failure and updating based on inspection. In: Proc. 1st int ASRANet colloquium. Glasgow: ASRANet; 2002.
26. Broek · 1986
27. Anderson · 2004
28. BS 7910:2013. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. BSI, London; 2013.
29. Maddox SJ, Andrews RM. Stress intensity factors for weld toe cracks. In: Proc. 1st int conf computer-aided assessment and control of localized damage. Portsmouth: Springer-Verlag; 1990.
30. Newman JC, Raju IS. Stress intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads. NASA technical memorandum 85793. Hampton: Langley Research Centre; 1984.10.1520/STP37074S ↗
31. Leendertz · 2008
32. Beales · 1989
33. JCSS probabilistic model code, part 3: material properties. Aalborg: JCCS; 2000. .
34. Monte-carlo simulations of life expectancy using the dual boundary method10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00042-X ↗
35. Remarks on a multivariate transformation10.1214/aoms/1177729394 ↗
36. Do Rosenblatt and Nataf isoprobabilistic transformations really differ?10.1016/j.probengmech.2009.04.006 ↗
37. Melchers · 1999
38. The irrepressible relationship between the Paris law10.1016/0013-7944(91)90160-3 ↗
39. Bridge fatigue damage evaluation and updating using non-destructive inspections10.1016/0013-7944(95)00136-0 ↗
40. Self-similarity and crack growth instability in the correlation between the Paris’ constants10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.007 ↗
41. Austen · 1983
42. Noordhoek · 1993
43. Pijpers · 2012
44. Ohta A, Suzuki N, Maeda Y. Unique fatigue threshold and growth properties of welded joints in a tensile residual stress field. Int J Fatigue 1997;19–S1:S303–10.10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00049-2 ↗
45. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005 ↗
46. Kountouris · 1989
47. Kountouris IS, Baker MJ. Defect assessment: analysis of the dimensions of defects detected by ultrasonic inspection in an offshore structure. CESLIC Report OR8; 1989.
48. A simplified fatigue assessment method for high quality welded cruciform joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.016 ↗
49. Kolstein · 2007
50. Probabilistic model for fatigue crack growth and fracture of welded joints in civil engineering structures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.008 ↗
51. Visser P. POD/POS curves for non-destructive examination. Offshore technology report 2000/018. Norwich: Health and Safety Executive; 2002.
52. FHWA Reliability of visual inspection for highway Bridges. Volume I, Final report, FHWA Report No. FHWA-RD-010020. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; 2001.
53. TWI Ltd. NDT capability for the detection and sizing of surface-breaking fatigue cracks in welded steel bridges. Rep No 12539/1/01. In: Fatigue assessment of steel bridge components with existing cracks. Highways Agency Contract 3/284; 2001.
54. Reliability of the detection of flaws and of the determination of flaw size
55. Lewis WH, Sproat WH, Dodd BD, Hamilton JM. Reliability of non-destructive inspection. SA-ALC/MME. 76-6-38-1. San Antonio: San Antonio Air Logistics Centre; 1978.10.21236/ADA072097 ↗
56. Reliability prediction for structures under cyclic loads and recurring inspections10.5028/jatm.2009.0102201209 ↗
57. A comparative study of fatigue inspection methods10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.08.008 ↗
58. Morales-Nápoles O, Steenbergen RDJM. Analysis of axle and vehicle load properties through Bayesian Networks based on Weigh-in-Motion data. Rel Eng Syst Safe; in press [2014].
59. Ludescher · 2003
60. Bridge fatigue assessment and management using reliability-based crack growth and probability of detection models10.1016/j.probengmech.2011.02.001 ↗
61. Safety and inspection planning of older installations10.1243/1748006XJRR136 ↗