Fretting fatigue – Experimental and numerical approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Current knowledge about the fretting phenomenon and multiaxial fatigue criteria is briefly reviewed. Experimental equipment for fretting fatigue testing at the Czech Technical University (CTU) in Prague is introduced, and the results of experiments are presented. The digital image correlation (DIC) method was employed to calibrate the friction coefficient in a numerical model. This detailed model of the fretting-fatigue experimental setup was then used for computing the stress field histories of periodically loaded specimens. This data was used as input for the multiaxial fatigue criteria, and the prediction quality of the criteria was verified. The prediction model assessment results are presented. The results indicate that the criteria are not capable of handling the different damage mechanisms, which vary with the pressure load of the contact interface. A certain correction reflecting the contact kinematic behaviour therefore needs to be introduced into their mathematical formulation. The DIC method performed well in capturing local displacements in the vicinity of the stick–slip interface, and it provided necessary data for calibrating the friction coefficient.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. On the prediction of high-cycle fretting fatigue strength: theory of critical distances vs. hot–spot approach10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.026 ↗
2. Mechanics of two-stage crack growth in fretting fatigue10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.06.009 ↗
3. Fretting fatigue case studies of engineering components10.1016/j.triboint.2006.02.051 ↗
4. On fretting maps10.1016/0043-1648(88)90134-2 ↗
5. Development of a model for the prediction of the fretting fatigue regimes10.1557/JMR.2001.0371 ↗
6. The use of multiaxial fatigue models to predict fretting fatigue life of components subjected to different contact stress fields10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00820.x ↗
7. Recent developments in the understanding of fretting fatigue10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.01.013 ↗
8. Contact-evolution based prediction of fretting fatigue life: effect of slip amplitude10.1016/j.wear.2006.11.004 ↗
9. On the use of multiaxial fatigue criteria for fretting fatigue life assessment10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.018 ↗
10. A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001 ↗
11. Numerical prediction of fretting contact durability using energy wear approach: optimisation of finite-element model10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.116 ↗
12. Simple parameters to predict effect of surface damage on fretting fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.008 ↗
13. A fracture mechanics methodology assessment for fretting fatigue10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00115-4 ↗
14. A fracture mechanics life prediction methodology applied to dovetail fretting10.1016/j.triboint.2006.02.006 ↗
15. A unified numerical approach for multiaxial fatigue limit evaluation10.1081/SME-100100613 ↗
16. Efficient algorithms for calculation of shear stress amplitude and amplitude of the second invariant of the stress deviator in fatigue criteria applications10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00181-5 ↗
17. Efficiency of algorithms for shear stress amplitude calculation in critical plane class fatigue criteria10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.005 ↗
18. Using enclosing ellipsoids in multiaxial fatigue strength criteria10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.07.006 ↗
19. Prismatic hull: a new measure of shear stress amplitude in multiaxial high cycle fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.12.010 ↗
20. On the characterization of the critical plane with a simple and fast alternative measure of the shear stress amplitude in multiaxial fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.002 ↗
21. Remarks on multiaxial fatigue limit criteria based on prismatic hulls and ellipsoids10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.004 ↗
22. Sutton · 2009
23. Dowling NE. Mean stress effect in stress-life and strain-life fatigue. In: SAE paper no. 2004-01-2227. Fatigue 2004: second SAE Brasil int conference on fatigue, São Paulo; 2004,.10.4271/2004-01-2227 ↗
24. Fatlim database. [accessed 31.12.11].
25. Pragtic. [accessed: 31.12.11].
26. Effect of large hydrostatic pressure on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel
27. Sines, G. Failure of materials under combined repeated stresses with superimposed static stresses. NACA-TN-3495, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington; 1955.
28. A new criterion of fatigue strength of a round bar subjected to combined static and repeated bending and torsion10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb01358.x ↗
29. Criterion for high cycle fatigue failure under multiaxial loading
30. On a new multiaxial fatigue limit criterion: theory and application
31. Multiaxial fatigue: a stress based criterion for hard metals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.006 ↗
32. Two new multiaxial criteria for high cycle fatigue computation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.015 ↗
33. Multiaxial fatigue criterion for complex loading based on stress invariants10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.11.006 ↗