journal article·2011-11Open access

Experimental investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP joints under different load ratios

Roohollah Sarfaraz, Anastasios P. Vassilopoulos, Thomas Keller

International Journal of Fatigue· Volume 33· Issue 11

Abstract

The fatigue response of adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP double-lap joints was investigated under different loading patterns and experimental results were obtained for three different applied load ratios: R = 0.1, R = 10, and R = -1. The fatigue life of the examined joint configuration is affected by the different loading type, generally being shorter for tensile loads and longer when compressive loads were applied. The dominant failure mode was a fiber-tear failure that occurred in the mat layers of the pultruded laminates for the tensile and reversed loadings, while the failure was driven by a crack in the roving layer in the case of R = 10. A decrease in joint stiffness of approximately 8% was observed for the tensile and reversed loading conditions, while a very limited stiffness degradation of around 2% was recorded under compression. The results proved that there is no correlation between the applied load level and stiffness degradation at failure. Independent of the failure mode, similar crack development was observed, characterized by an initial and final region of accelerated propagation, and a middle part of linear, and slower, crack propagation, corresponding to around 80% of the fatigue life. Considerable differences were observed for the derived fatigue crack growth curves under different load ratios. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Experimental dynamic characterization of an FRP composite bridge superstructure assembly10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00115-5 ↗
2. Fatigue behavior of adhesively connected pultruded GFRP profiles10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.10.008 ↗
3. Quasi-static and fatigue performance of a cellular FRP bridge deck adhesively bonded to steel girders10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.028 ↗
4. Fatigue behavior of adhesively bonded joints composed of pultruded GFRP adherends for civil infrastructure applications10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.026 ↗
5. Stiffness degradation and fatigue life prediction of adhesively-bonded joints for fiber-reinforced polymer composites10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.007 ↗
6. Environmental effects on fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded structure joints10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.024 ↗
7. Fracture of adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP joints under constant amplitude fatigue loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.11.004 ↗
8. Mode I fracture of epoxy bonded composite joints: 2. Fatigue loading10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00050-1 ↗
9. The prediction of crack growth in bonded joints under cyclic-fatigue loading. I. Experimental studies10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00074-5 ↗
10. Assessing stress and mean load effects on the fatigue response of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00049-9 ↗
11. Ductile double-lap joints from brittle GFRP laminates and ductile adhesives. Part I: experimental investigation10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.015 ↗
12. Progressive failure process of adhesively bonded joints composed of pultruded GFRP10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.06.011 ↗
13. Influence of the constant life diagram formulation on the fatigue life prediction of composite materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.008 ↗
14. Piecewise non-linear constant life diagram formulation for FRP composite materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.013 ↗
15. Tensile fatigue performance of pultruded glass fiber reinforced polymer profiles10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.03.021 ↗
16. Finite element prediction of fatigue crack propagation lifetime in composite bonded joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.10.002 ↗