The role of strain ratcheting and mesh refinement in finite element analyses of plasticity induced crack closure
Source abstract
Abstract
Numerical investigations of plasticity induced crack closure using the finite element method typically assume: (1) the opening behavior remains independent of the simulated rate of crack growth, and (2) a threshold element size exists below which crack opening loads become mesh independent. Nevertheless, examples in the recent literature and also in the present work indicate these assumptions do not always hold. The current work demonstrates the field results (displacements, stress–strain) for cyclic loading of stationary cracks converge with mesh refinement. However, when the cyclic load regime includes systematic crack extension, certain conditions lead to highly mesh dependent fields and opening loads. The cyclic accumulation of permanent deformation (strain ratcheting) necessarily produces mesh dependence when the finite element size dictates the rate of crack growth. Moreover, extensive ratcheting leads to physically unrealistic shapes of the crack opening profiles. This work explores the link between strain ratcheting, mesh dependence and load-cycle effects within a small-scale yielding framework, including the influence of plane strain vs. plane stress constraints, constitutive definition (non-hardening, linear kinematic hardening and nonlinear kinematic hardening) and the monotonic flow properties. Key conclusions from this work include: (1) near-tip strain ratcheting generally increases with decreased hardening and can be much more pronounced in plane strain than in plane stress; (2) for models with significant ratcheting, slower rates of simulated growth due to smaller element size and/or more load cycles between crack advancements generally reduce the opening loads; and (3) the computed opening loads depend intrinsically on the amount of ratcheting, and the rate of crack growth as determined by the element size and number of load cycles between crack advancements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
2. Newman Jr JC. A finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure. In: Mechanics of crack growth, ASTM STP 590; 1976. p. 281–301.10.1520/STP33952S ↗
3. A numerical investigation of 3-d small-scale yielding fatigue crack growth10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00003-1 ↗
4. Three-dimensional effects on fatigue crack closure in the small-scale yielding regime10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00655.x ↗
5. Armstrong PJ, Frederick CO. A mathematical representation of the multi-axial Baushinger effect. Tech report CEGB report RD/B/N731, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, R&D Department; 1965.
6. Two material models for cyclic plasticity: non-linear kinematic hardening and generalized plasticity10.1016/0749-6419(94)00039-5 ↗
7. Hibbit, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc. ABAQUS standard user’s manual: version 6.3, Pawtucket, RI; 2002.
8. McClung RC. Finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure: a historical and critical review. In: Fatigue ’99: proceedings of the seventh international fatigue congress, 8–12 June, 1999, Beijing, China; 1999.
9. Finite element analysis of plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure: an overview10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00099-7 ↗
10. [10] Cochran KB. Numerical modeling issues in finite element simulation of plasticity induced crack closure with an emphasis on material model effects. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign; 2009.
11. On the finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure – 1. Basic modeling issues10.1016/0013-7944(89)90027-1 ↗
12. High resolution numerical and experimental studies of fatigue cracks10.1016/0013-7944(91)90027-X ↗
13. Fatigue crack propagation and closure behavior of modified 1070 steel: finite element study10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00104-X ↗
14. Influence of minimum element size to determine crack closure stress by the finite element method10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.04.002 ↗
15. A numerical study of fatigue crack closure induced by plasticity10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00738.x ↗
16. Finite element modeling of plasticity-induced crack closure with emphasis on geometry and mesh refinement effects10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00168-6 ↗
17. A reexamination of plasticity-induced crack closure in fatigue crack propagation10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.005 ↗
18. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, Part I: development of constitutive relations10.1115/1.2823355 ↗
19. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, Part II: comparison with model simulations and experiments10.1115/1.2823356 ↗
20. Prediction of fatigue crack growth rates using crack closure finite element analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.002 ↗
21. Numerical simulation of plasticity induced crack closure: identification and discussion of parameters10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.009 ↗
22. On the accurate assessment of crack opening and closing stresses in plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure problems10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.09.007 ↗
23. Bauschinger effect of alloys and plasticity-induced crack closure: a finite element study10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00259.x ↗
24. Numerical simulation of plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure with emphasis on the crack growth scheme: 2d and 3d analyses10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.10.017 ↗
25. The evolution of the stress–strain fields near a fatigue crack tip and plasticity induced crack closure revisited10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00716.x ↗
26. Plane strain crack closure and cyclic hardening10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00061-3 ↗
27. On the finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure – 1. Basic modeling issues10.1016/0013-7944(89)90027-1 ↗
28. Effect of T-stress on fatigue crack closure in 3-d small-scale yielding10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.004 ↗