journal article·2020-05

Uncertainty quantification of fatigue S-N curves with sparse data using hierarchical Bayesian data augmentation

Jie Chen, Siying Liu, Wei Zhang, Yongming Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A novel statistical uncertainty quantification (UQ) method for fatigue S-N curves with sparse data is proposed in this paper. Sparse data observation is very common in fatigue testing due to various reasons, such as time and budget constraints, availability of testing materials and resources. A brief review of existing UQ methods for fatigue properties with sparse data is given. Following this, a new method, called Hierarchical Bayesian data augmentation (HBDA) is proposed to integrate the hierarchical Bayesian modeling (HBM) and Bayesian data augmentation (BDA) to deal with sparse data problem specifically for fatigue S-N curves. The key idea is to use: (1) HBM for analyzing the variability of S-N curves both within one stress level and across stress levels; (2) BDA to build up a large-size sample of fatigue life data based on the observed sparse samples. Four strategies to estimate the probabilistic S-N curves with sparse data are proposed: (1) hierarchical Bayesian modeling (HBM) only, (2) Bayesian data augmentation (BDA) only, (3) posterior information from HBM used as prior information for BDA (HBM + BDA), and (4) augmented data from BDA used by HBM (BDA + HBM). The strategy (3) and (4) are named HBDA hereafter. Next, the four strategies are validated and compared using aluminum alloy data and laminate panel data from open literature. Convergence study and confidence estimation is performed, and it is shown that the HBDA methods (i.e., HBM + BDA or BDA + HBM) have better performance compared with the classical method and HBM/BDA alone. The performance gain is especially significant when the number of available data samples is small. Finally, the proposed methodology is applied to a practical engineering problem for fatigue property quantification of the demolished Pearl Harbor Memorial Bridge, where only limited samples are available for testing. Conclusions and future work are drawn based on the proposed study.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
2. Optimization of fatigue life distribution model and establishment of probabilistic S-N curves for a 165ksi grade super high strength drill pipe steel10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.018 ↗
3. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005 ↗
4. Effects of the reinforcement ratio and chloride corrosion on the fatigue behavior of RC beams10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105299 ↗
5. Effects of pre-fatigue damage on high-cycle fatigue behavior and chloride permeability of RC beams10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.002 ↗
6. A multi-feature integration method for fatigue crack detection and crack length estimation in riveted lap joints using Lamb waves10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105007 ↗
7. Hierarchical Bayesian fatigue data analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.043 ↗
8. Equivalent surface defect model for fatigue life prediction of steel reinforcing bars with pitting corrosion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.019 ↗
9. Life time extension of turbine rotating components under risk constraints: a state-of-the-art review and case study10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.003 ↗
10. A critical plane-energy model for multiaxial fatigue life prediction10.1111/ffe.12614 ↗
11. Guo Z, Ma Y, Wang L, Zhang J, E H. Corrosion fatigue crack propagation mechanism of high strength steel bar in various environments. J Mater Civ Eng 2019.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003165 ↗
12. Backwards statistical inference method for P-S–N curve fitting with small-sample experiment data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.006 ↗
13. Probabilistic life prediction for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seasonal corrosion-fatigue damage10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002666 ↗
14. Collins · 1993
15. Stochastic fatigue damage modeling under variable amplitude loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.009 ↗
16. Prevention. P-S–N curve fitting method based on sample aggregation principle10.1007/s11668-019-00586-1 ↗
17. Gao J, An Z, Liu B. A new method for obtaining P-S-N curves under the condition of small sample. 2017;231:130–7.10.1177/1748006X16686896 ↗
18. Survival analysis of fatigue data: Application of generalized linear models and hierarchical Bayesian model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.027 ↗
19. Gelman · 2006
20. Evaluation. A review of methods for missing data10.1076/edre.7.4.353.8937 ↗
21. A note on Bayesian inference after multiple imputation10.1198/tast.2010.09109 ↗
22. Dealing with missing data: Part I10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00131-9 ↗
23. Dealing with missing data: Part II10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00132-0 ↗
24. Direct prediction methods on lifetime distribution of organic light-emitting diodes from accelerated degradation tests10.1109/TR.2010.2040761 ↗
25. Hoff · 2009
26. Wikle CK. Hierarchcal Baysian models for predicting the spread of ecological processes. 2003;84:1382–94.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1382:HBMFPT]2.0.CO;2 ↗
27. The exponential law of endurance tests
28. Clayton DG. Generalized linear mixed models. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. 1996;1:275–302.
29. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Introducing markov chain monte carlo. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. 1996;1:19.10.1201/b14835 ↗
30. Gilks WR. Full conditional distributions. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. 1996:75–88.10.1201/b14835 ↗
31. Bayesian entropy network for fusion of different types of information10.1016/j.ress.2019.106747 ↗
32. Gelman · 2013
33. Schafer · 1997
34. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458 ↗
35. How multiple imputation makes a difference10.1093/pan/mpw020 ↗
36. Ni D, Leonard JD, Guin A, Feng C. Multiple imputation scheme for overcoming the missing values and variability issues in ITS data. 2005;131:931–8.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:12(931) ↗
37. Rubin · 2004
38. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9 ↗
39. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014 ↗
40. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. 1999;8:3–15.10.1177/096228029900800102 ↗
41. The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research10.1186/s12874-015-0022-1 ↗
42. Statistical evaluation of fatigue life and fatigue strength in circular- hole notched specimens of a carbon eight-harness-satin/epoxy laminate