journal article·2019-06

Lessons from a fatigue prediction challenge for an aircraft wing shear tie post

B. Main, R. Evans, K. Walker, X. Yu, L. Molent

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Like many aircraft operators and maintainers, the Royal Australia Air Force requires the most robust of metal fatigue analysis tools for both informed acquisition and cost effective sustainment of aircraft. The Defence Science and Technology Group has been investigating and enhancing metal fatigue predictive tools for many years. This paper describes a local blind-prediction challenge for a series of coupons manufactured from Aluminium Alloy 7050-T7451 plate simulating a combat aircraft wing root shear restraint (or shear tie post) subject to a combined aerodynamic buffet and manoeuvre load spectrum. Analysts were provided with details including the geometry, material and loading, and were asked to predict the total fatigue life. Results from a detailed three dimensional finite element model of a cracked or uncracked test coupon were also available to the analysts. The results from two separate, independent blind predictions are presented and assessed along with further non-blind analyses to evaluate the current capabilities. The exercise found that accurate and reliable predictions are possible in a case like this, but the results are dependent on the availability of high-fidelity short crack rate data and a suitable stress intensity Beta solution. The work will provide confidence in existing fatigue life modelling capabilities leading to improvements in safety, availability and cost reduction.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Tiffany · 2010
2. Milestone case histories in aircraft structural integrity
3. Fatigue Crack growth from flaws in combat aircraft10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.002 ↗
4. On the causes of fractures of the axles of railway carriages
5. Suresh · 2006
6. Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-3 ↗
7. F-35 full scale durability modeling and test10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.693 ↗
8. Hoeppner D, Venter R, McCammond D and Ekvall J. Aircraft Structural Fatigue, Four volumes of notes for FAA two week course held at University of Toronto (1979-85) and Univeristy of Utah (1985-92), FAA, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; 1979–1985.
9. Hoeppner D. The Formation/Nucleation of Fatigue Cracks in Aircraft Structural Materials. In: Komoraski J, editor. 26th ICAF Symposium – Montréal, 1–3 June 2011; 2011.10.1007/978-94-007-1664-3_18 ↗
10. Wong AK. Blueprint TITAN: A roadmap towards the virtual fatigue test through a collaborative international effort, Proc. 29th ICAF Symposium, Nagoya, June 2017; 2017.
11. Main · 2018
12. Evans · 2017
13. Girard E. FISIF RCAF Task 1202 Wing Root Shear Tie @ Y508 Spectrum Derivation, GAL-318-0508, Mirabel, L3 MAS, Canada; 2013.
14. Choi · 2018
15. Burchill · 2013
16. Engineering Software Research and Development Inc., (2015) StressCheck® 10.2 Build 21206.
17. Engineering Software Research and Development Inc., (2015) StressCheck® Master Guide, Release 10.2.
18. Battelle Memorial Institute, Metallic Materials Properties Development and Standardization (MMPDS-11), 2016.
19. Grandt · 2004 · 226
20. Hu W, Wallbrink C. CGAP Capabilities and Application in Aircraft Structural Lifing, In: 15th Australian International Aerospace Congress (AIAC15) Melbourne, Australia; 2013.
21. Newman JC Jr., FASTRAN A Fatigue Crack Growth Life-Prediction Code Based on the Crack-Closure Concept Version 5.4, Fatigue & Fracture Associates LLC; 2013.
22. White · 2018
23. Closure measurement and analysis for small cracks from natural discontinuities in an aluminium alloy
24. Walker KF, Barter SA. The critical importance of correctly characterising fatigue crack growth rates in the threshold regime, 26th ICAF Symposium – Montréal, Canada, 1–3 June 2011; 2011.10.1007/978-94-007-1664-3_20 ↗
25. Harter JA. AFGROW user's guide and technical manual, AFRL-VA-WP-TR-2004; 2004.
26. Fatigue crack growth in a diverse range of materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.01.004 ↗
27. Calculating crack growth from small discontinuities in 7050–T7451 under combat aircraft spectra10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.009 ↗
28. A crack growth based individual aircraft monitoring method utilizing a damage metric
29. Burchill M, Barter S, Chan LH. Improving fatigue life predictions with a crack growth rate material model based on small crack growth & legacy data, Proc. 17th Australian Aerospace Congress, 26-28 February 2017, Melbourne; 2017.
30. Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures10.1115/1.3609637 ↗
31. Schwarmann · 1985
32. A review of equivalent pre-crack sizes in aluminium alloy 7050–T745110.1111/ffe.12214 ↗
33. Murakami · 1987
34. Newman JC Jr., Raju IS. Analyses of surface cracks in finite plates under tension or bending loads, Technical Report Technical Memorandum 85793, NASA; 1984.
35. Experimental and finite element analyses on stress intensity factors of an elliptical surface crack in a circular shaft under tension and bending10.1023/B:FRAC.0000047784.23236.7d ↗
36. Fatigue crack propagation in shafts with shoulder fillets10.1016/0013-7944(86)90256-0 ↗
37. Stress intensity factors for fatigue cracking of round bars10.1016/0142-1123(81)90059-1 ↗
38. Simplified model for the fatigue growth analyses of surface cracks in round bars under mode I10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00037-1 ↗
39. Fatigue crack propagation in round bars10.1002/mawe.19860170907 ↗
40. A simple experimental procedure for stress intensity factor calibration10.1016/0013-7944(69)90012-5 ↗
41. The lead crack fatigue lifing framework