journal article·2015-10

Review of fatigue data for welds improved by tungsten inert gas dressing

Halid Can Yıldırım

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Experimental fatigue data points for the welds improved via the tungsten inert gas (TIG) dressing method have been extracted from the existing literature. The extracted fatigue data includes experimental points for longitudinal attachments, transverse non-load carrying welds, butt joints and T-joints. In total, 311 published test results for weld details with various yield strengths ( 272 ⩽ f y ⩽ 1100 MPa ) and stress ratios ( - 1 ⩽ R ⩽ 0.2 ) are presented and analysed. A step-wise increase in the fatigue strength based on the specimen geometry and the steel grade is proposed with an S–N slope of m 1 = 4 . All of the fatigue data for constant amplitude loading are found to be in good agreement with respect to the proposed design curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Maddox · 1991
2. Review: low transformation temperature weld filler for tensile residual stress reduction10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.050 ↗
3. Fatigue of high strength steel joints welded with low temperature transformation consumables10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.02.013 ↗
4. Haagensen · 2013
5. Fatigue strength improvement of steel structures by high-frequency mechanical impact: proposed fatigue assessment guidelines10.1007/s40194-013-0075-x ↗
6. Watkinson · 1971
7. DNV-RP-C203. Recommended practice for fatigue design of offshore steel structures. DET NORSKE VERITAS, Norway; April 2010.
8. BS7910. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. British Standards Institution, UK; 2005.
9. PD6493. Guidance on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures. British Standards Institution, UK; 1991.
10. TIG-dressing of high strength butt welded connections. Part 2: Physical testing and modelling10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.068 ↗
11. Pijpers R. Fatigue strength of welded connections made of very high strength cast and rolled steels. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology; 2011.10.1201/b10564-70 ↗
12. Hobbacher · 2009
13. Fricke · 2012
14. Overview of fatigue data for high frequency mechanical impact treated welded joints10.1007/BF03321368 ↗
15. SSAB. Data sheets for Domex 420 MC, Domex 700 MC and Domex 960. Datasheets: 11-02-03 GB8415 Domex, 11-02-03 GB8421 Domex and 11-02-16 GB8435 Domex. .
16. A. E739-10. Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life and strain-life fatigue data. ASTM International, US; 2010.
17. Lagerqvist O, Clarin M, Gozzi J, Völling D, Pak B, Stötzl J, et al. LiftHigh-efficient lifting equipment with extra high-strength steel. Research report. European Commission, EUR22569EN, Brussels; 2007.
18. Schijve J. A normal distribution or a Weibull distribution for fatigue lives. Report LR-689. Delft University of Technology; 1992.
19. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
20. Fatigue performance of tungsten inert gas (tig) and plasma welds in thin sections10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00084-X ↗
21. Haagensen P, Alnes O. Progress report on IIW WG2 round robin fatigue testing program on 700MPa and 350MPa YS steels. International Institute of Welding IIW Document XIII-2081-05.
22. Huther I, Suchier Y, Lieurade H. Fatigue behaviour of longitudinal non-load carrying joints improved by burr grinding, tig dressing. International Institute of Welding IIW Document XIII-2108-06.
23. Investigation of the fatigue behaviour of the welded joints treated by TIG dressing and ultrasonic peening under variable-amplitude load10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.009 ↗
24. Dahle T. Design fatigue strength of tig-dressed welded joints in high-strength steels subjected to spectrum loading. ABB Corporate Research S-721, 78.
25. Lopez Martinez L, Blom A. Influence of life improvement methods on different steel grades under fatigue loading. Fatigue design 1995. Proc VTT symposium, vol. 157. Helsinki, 5–8 September.
26. Kuhlmann U, Dürr A, Bergmann J, Thumser R. Effizienter stahlbau aus höherfesten stählen unter ermüdungsbeanspruchung (fatigue strength improvement for welded high strength steel connections due to the application of post-weld treatment methods). Research report. Forschungsvorhaben P 620 FOSTA, Verlag und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH, Düsseldorf, Germany, 124; 2006.10.2749/222137806796185571 ↗
27. Effect of weld quality and postweld improvement techniques on the fatigue resistance of extra high strength steels10.1007/BF03266658 ↗
28. Manteghi S, Maddox S. Methods for fatigue life improvement of welded joints in medium and high strength steels. International Institute of Welding IIW Document XIII-2006-04.
29. Bousseau M, Millot T. Fatigue life improvement of welded structures by ultrasonic needle peening compared to tig dressing. International Institute of Welding IIW Document XIII-2125-06.
30. Fatigue behavior of the low-strength steel welded joints treated by tig dressing and ultrasonic peening combined method
31. Haagensen P. IIW round robin and design recommendations for improvement methods. In: Proc IIW 50th annual assembly conference. San Francisco, WRC, New York; 1997.
32. Comparison of ultrasonic impact treatment (uit) and other fatigue life improvement methods10.1007/BF03266368 ↗
33. Pedersen M, Mouritsen O, Hansen M, Andersen J, Wenderby J. Comparison of post weld treatment of high strength steel welded joints in medium cycle fatigue. International Institute of Welding IIW Document XIII-2272-09.
34. Fatigue behaviour of t welded joints rehabilitated by tungsten inert gas and plasma dressing10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.051 ↗
35. Investigation of TIG dressing and chilling treatment for improving the fatigue strength of welded joints10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.279.230 ↗