Stochastic prediction of fatigue loading using real-time monitoring data
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate characterization and prediction of loading, while properly accounting for uncertainty, are essential for probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis. Three different techniques – rainflow counting, the Markov chain method, and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) modeling – are investigated for stochastic characterization and reconstruction of the fatigue load history. The ARMA method is extended in this paper by introducing random coefficients and probabilistic weights, to account for the uncertainty in the selection of the model, inherent variability in loading, and uncertainty due to sparse data. A continuous model updating approach based on real-time monitoring data is developed and applied to all the three techniques mentioned above. The relation between prediction accuracy and updating interval is evaluated quantitatively. A quantitative model validation approach using Bayesian hypothesis testing is proposed to assess the confidence in load prediction from all the three methods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Doebling S, Hemez F. Overview of uncertainty assessment for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Intl workshop on structural health monitoring. Stanford University, Stanford, California; 2001.10.2172/783378 ↗
2. Damage prognosis: the future of structural health monitoring10.1098/rsta.2006.1927 ↗
3. Real-time fatigue life estimation in mechanical structures10.1088/0957-0233/18/7/022 ↗
4. Uncertainty analysis of a neural network used for fatigue lifetime prediction10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.12.004 ↗
5. Sankararaman S, Ling Y, Shantz C, Mahadevan S. Uncertainty quantification in fatigue damage prognosis. In: Annual conference of the prognostics and health management society. San Diego, CA; 2009.
6. An experimental analysis of fatigue crack growth under random loading10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00018-5 ↗
7. Numerical and experimental analysis of fatigue crack growth under random loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.12.008 ↗
8. Experimental study and modelling of short fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloy Al7010–T7451 under random loading10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00006-3 ↗
9. Generation and use of standardised load spectra and load–time histories10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.09.012 ↗
10. A load history generation approach for full-scale accelerated fatigue tests10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.12.004 ↗
11. ASTM. E1049 – 85, standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis; 2005.
12. Fatigue failure predictions for complicated stress–strain histories
13. Fatigue loading history reconstruction based on the rainflow technique10.1016/0142-1123(90)90679-9 ↗
14. Cumulative damage in fatigue10.1115/1.4009458 ↗
15. Modified rainflow counting keeping the load sequence10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00078-9 ↗
16. A Markov matrix for fatigue load simulation and rainflow range evaluation10.1016/0167-4730(89)90025-8 ↗
17. Simulation of load sequences from rainflow matrices: Markov method10.1016/0142-1123(96)80001-Z ↗
18. Cycle distribution and fatigue damage under broad-band random loading10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00032-4 ↗
19. Cycle distribution and fatigue damage assessment in broad-band non-Gaussian random processes10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.11.001 ↗
20. On fatigue damage assessment in bimodal random processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.013 ↗
21. Box · 1994
22. Modeling of random vehicle loading histories for fatigue analysis10.1504/IJVD.1994.061876 ↗
23. On multi-axial random fatigue load modeling
24. Sargent R. Verification and validation of simulation models of the 37th conference on winter simulation; 2005. p. 130–43.10.1109/WSC.2005.1574246 ↗
25. Knepell · 1993
26. Defense Modeling and Simulation Office. Verification, validation, and accreditation (VV&A) recommended practices guide. Alexandria, VA: Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering; 1996.
27. Validation and error estimation of computational models10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.035 ↗
28. Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3 ↗
29. Stochastic reconstruction of loading histories from a rainflow matrix10.1002/zamm.19970770315 ↗
30. Karlin · 1966
31. Hanke · 2005
32. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models10.1093/biomet/65.2.297 ↗
33. Model uncertainty and Bayesian updating in reliability-based inspection10.1016/S0167-4730(00)00005-9 ↗
34. Pericchi LR. Model selection and hypothesis testing based on objective probabilities and Bayes factors. In: Dey DK, Rao CR, editors, Handbook of statistics, bayesian thinking, modeling and computation, vol. 25. North Holland; 2005. p. 115–49.10.1016/S0169-7161(05)25004-6 ↗
35. Haldar · 2000
36. Khosrovaneh AK, Dowling NE, Berens AP, Gallagher JP. Fatigue life estimates for helicopter loading spectra, NASA contractor report 181941; 1989.