Prediction of non-proportionality factors of multiaxial histories using the Moment Of Inertia method
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work studies further an approach originally proposed to evaluate equivalent stress and strain ranges in non-proportional (NP) load histories, called the Moment Of Inertia (MOI) method. The MOI method assumes that the path contour in the deviatoric stress or strain diagram is a homogeneous wire with unit mass. The center of mass of such wire gives then the mean component of the path, while the moments of inertia of the wire can be used to obtain the equivalent stress or strain ranges. The MOI method is an alternative to convex enclosure methods, such as Dang Van’s Minimum Ball or the Maximum Prismatic Hull methods, without the need for computationally-intensive search algorithms or adjustable parameters. The MOI method is extended here to calculate as well the non-proportionality factor F np of generic multiaxial load histories, formulated in an alternative sub-space of the deviatoric plastic strains. Experimental results for 14 different multiaxial histories prove the effectiveness of the MOI method to predict the observed non-proportionality factors. Hence, it can be a most useful tool for the computation of multiaxial fatigue damage in practical applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Multiaxial Fatigue
2. Multiaxial cycle counting for critical plane methods10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00148-2 ↗
3. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories – Part II: The modified Wang-Brown method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.012 ↗
4. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories – Part I: Enclosing surface methods10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.014 ↗
5. Effect of microstructure and hardness on non-proportional cyclic hardening coefficient and predictions10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.056 ↗
6. A non-proportionality parameter and a cyclic viscoplastic constitutive model taking into account amplitudedependences and memory effects of isotropic hardening
7. Cyclic deformation of 1% Cr–Mo–V steel under out-of-phase loads10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb01357.x ↗
8. Nonproportional low cycle fatigue criterion for type 304 stainless steel10.1115/1.2804541 ↗
9. Characterizing the non-proportional and out-of-phase extend of tensor paths10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00355.x ↗
10. A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
11. Dislocation structure and non-proportional hardening of type 304 stainless steel10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb01496.x ↗
12. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, Part I: Development of constitutive relations10.1115/1.2823355 ↗
13. Chaboche JL, Dang Van K, Cordier G, Modelization of the strain memory effect on the cyclic hardening of 316 stainless steel. In: Transactions of the Fifth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Div. L, Berlin, 1979.
14. Modeling of cyclic ratchetting plasticity, Part II: Comparison of model simulations with experiments10.1115/1.2823356 ↗
15. Atkinson · 1989
16. LeMaitre · 2001 · vol. I