journal article·2014-05Open access

New approach for analysis of complex multiaxial loading paths

V. Anes, L. Reis, B. Li, M. Fonte, M. de Freitas

Abstract

Abstract Experimentally, it has been proven that the stress level needed to cause fatigue failure in pure shear is less than the axial one. This fact has led to consider a stress scale factor between shear and axial stress in order to reduce different applied stresses to the same shear stress space or principal stress space to facilitate the yielding analysis or fatigue damage evaluations. In this way most of multiaxial fatigue models use a stress scale factor to consider the fatigue damage contributions from the axial and shear stress components regarding the material strength degradation. Much efforts were made to quantify the effective shear and axial stress amplitudes under a three-dimensional stress state, however, the combined damage resulted from those amplitudes have been reduced to a constant value. In some cases, the approaches used proved to be inadequate, leading to compute the same equivalent stress for different loading paths with different fatigue lives. In this work it is performed a series of multiaxial fatigue tests on a high-strength steel in order to determine the multiaxial fatigue strength under proportional and non-proportional loading conditions. A stress scale factor function was mapped based on the experimental results using as arguments, the axial stress amplitude and the stress amplitude ratio, which has proven to be sensitive to the loading path nature. Using the stress scale factor surface an equivalent shear stress was defined and it was used in the fatigue life correlation. Results indicate that the stress scale factor (ssf) is not a constant value and it is strongly dependent on stress amplitude level and loading path shape. The equivalent stress was successfully applied to proportional and non-proportional loading paths with satisfactory results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Mechanik der festen körper im plastisch deformablen zustand
2. Evaluation of multiaxial stress–strain models and fatigue life prediction methods under proportional loading
3. Analytical and experimental studies on fatigue crack path under complex multi-axial loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01001.x ↗
4. Comparative study on biaxial low-cycle fatigue behaviour of three structural steels10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01061.x ↗
5. A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
6. Sines · 1959
7. Socie · 2000
8. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
9. An equivalent stress process for fatigue life estimation under multiaxial loadings based on a new non linear damage model10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.105 ↗
10. An invariant-based approach for high-cycle fatigue calculation10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01331.x ↗
11. Crossland B. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel; 1956. p. 138–49.
12. A new approach to the evaluation of fatigue under multiaxial loadings10.1115/1.3224982 ↗
13. A fatigue criterion for general multiaxial loading10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00247.x ↗
14. A stress-based method to predict lifetime under multiaxial fatigue loadings10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00723.x ↗
15. A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001 ↗
16. Multiaxial fatigue life estimation based on a piecewise ruled S–N surface10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.10.007 ↗
17. The prediction of fatigue fracture under combined stresses at stress concentrations10.1299/jsme1958.4.443 ↗
18. Fatigue criteria under combined stresses or strains10.1115/1.3224995 ↗
19. Dang Van K, Griveau B. On a new multiaxial fatigue limit criterion: theory and application”. Biaxial and Multiaxial Fatigue, EGF 3, Mech. London: Engng Publications 1989;479–96.
20. Macro–micro approach in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue
21. A shear stress based critical plane criterion of multiaxial fatigue failure for design and life prediction10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00789.x ↗
22. A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00673.x ↗
23. An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress10.1299/jsme1958.20.257 ↗
24. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion for hard metals10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00075-X ↗
25. Multiaxial fatigue assessment using a simplified critical plane-based criterion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.004 ↗
26. Critical plane approaches for multiaxial fatigue damage assessment
27. A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress–strain conditions10.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_161_02 ↗
28. Damage accumulation due to sequential loading effect10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.232 ↗
29. Döring R, Hoffmeyer J, Seeger T, Vormwald M. A short crack growth model for the prediction of fatigue lives under multiaxial nonproportional loading. In: 6th Int conf on biaxial/multiaxial fatigue and fracture, Lissabon; 2001. p. 571–8.
30. Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.11.002 ↗
31. High cycle fatigue and fracture mode analysis of 2A12–T4 aluminum alloy under out-of-phase axial–torsion constant amplitude loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.017 ↗
32. Comments on fatigue crack growth under mixed modes I and III and pure mode III loading10.1520/STP36227S ↗
33. Schijve · 2001
34. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals10.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
35. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion and life prediction for metals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.003 ↗
36. Statistical evaluation of strain-life fatigue crack initiation predictions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.003 ↗