A computer model for fatigue crack growth from rough surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of roughness characteristics of machined surfaces on fatigue life were determined using a series of computer simulations. The random surfaces were generated with a wide variation of asperity heights, distance between asperities, asperity radii, and initial crack sizes to account for the presence of intrinsic defects. The growth rates of multiple cracks were determined as a function of stress amplitude and crack length accounting for local stress fields from the asperities, crack closure effects, and crack interaction. The fatigue life was governed by the number of cycles for the first crack to reach a critical length. The simulations were repeatedly conducted to test the effects of the average asperity height, the standard deviation of the asperity heights, the length of the sample, and the material constants. Results showed that fatigue life was a strong function of average asperity heights when the average height exceeded 0.1 μm. The role of the standard deviation of the asperity heights was evaluated, and when its magnitude approached the average asperity height considerable scatter in fatigue lives became evident. The crack growth constants were systematically varied in the simulations, with suitable normalization of results. Finally, the model was applied to ground and rough milled 4340 steel with satisfactory predictions of fatigue lives.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Moore HF, Kommers JB. An investigation of the fatigue of metals. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 1921;124.
2. Effect of scratches and of various workshop finishes upon the fatigue strength of steel
3. Lipson · 1963
4. Allowable stresses for steel members of finite life
5. Siebel E, Gaier M. Influence of surface roughness on the fatigue strength of steels and non-ferrous alloys. Engineers Digest 1957;18:109–112. (Translation from VDI Zeitschrift 1956;98(30):1715–1723).
6. Effect of surface roughness on low-cycle fatigue behavior of type 304 stainless steel10.1007/BF02642305 ↗
7. Influence of surface finish on low-cycle fatigue characteristics of type 316 stainless steel at 400°C10.1179/030634579790434150 ↗
8. A comparison of the fatigue strength of machined and as-cast surfaces of SG iron10.1016/0142-1123(82)90039-1 ↗
9. Some creep/fatigue properties of type 316 steel at 625°C10.1111/j.1460-2695.1980.tb01103.x ↗
10. Effect of surface texture on the initiation and propagation of small fatigue cracks in a forged 6082 aluminum alloy10.1016/0921-5093(93)90493-X ↗
11. Effect of crack initiation mode on low cycle fatigue life of type 304 stainless steel with surface roughness10.1016/0167-577X(90)90022-E ↗
12. The influence of surface roughness on the fatigue life and scatter of test results of two steels
13. Recent advances in fatigue crack growth modeling10.1007/BF00012668 ↗
14. Sun W. Finite element simulations of fatigue crack growth and closure. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1991.
15. Peterson · 1974
16. Press · 1992
17. Tada · 1985
18. On the quantitative analysis on fatigue crack propagation
19. McGreevy T. The competing roles of microstructure and flaw size on the fatigue limit of metals. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1998.
20. Ritchie RO. Near-threshold fatigue crack propagation in ultra-high strength steel: influence of load ratio and cyclic strength. J Engng Mat Tech 1977;195–204.10.1115/1.3443519 ↗