journal article·2023-12Open access

Investigating apparent plateau phases in fatigue after impact damage growth in CFRP with ultrasound scan and acoustic emissions

Davide Biagini, John-Alan Pascoe, René Alderliesten

Abstract

In previous literature, a plateau phase in fatigue growth of impact delamination projected area in CFRP was found. Explaining this plateau phase still represents a knowledge gap. In the present work, echo-pulse and through thickness transmission ultrasonic scan inspections were combined with acoustic emission monitoring to explain this plateau phase. Before the onset of growth outside of projected area, growth of delamination in the central impact cone and growth of smaller delamination was observed. Low-frequency acoustic emissions localized in the impact damage were recorded even before any type of growth was measured. The provided evidence suggests that an actual plateau phase may not exist if all the damage mechanisms are properly considered.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Impact on laminated composite materials10.1115/1.3119500 ↗
2. Damage mechanism characterization in composite damage tolerance investigations10.1016/0263-8223(93)90015-I ↗
3. Impact damage growth in composites under fatigue conditions monitored by acoustography10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00080-9 ↗
4. The influence of GI and GII on the compression after impact strength of carbon fiber/epoxy laminates10.1177/0021998317719567 ↗
5. Fatigue testing and buckling characteristics of impacted composite specimens10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00081-0 ↗
6. Buckling behaviour and delamination growth in impacted composite specimens under fatigue load: an experimental study10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00085-9 ↗
7. Davies G, Irving P. Impact, post-impact strength, and post-impact fatigue behavior of polymer composites. Elsevier Ltd; 2020. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102679-3.00011-3.10.1016/B978-0-08-102679-3.00011-3 ↗
8. Evaluation of damage evolution of impacted composite laminates under fatigue loadings by infrared thermography and ultrasonic methods10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106869 ↗
9. Fatigue behavior and lifetime distribution of impact-damaged carbon fiber/toughened epoxy composites under compressive loading10.1080/09243046.2013.768324 ↗
10. Load spectrum modification effects on fatigue of impact-damaged carbon fibre composite coupons10.1016/0010-4361(87)90414-9 ↗
11. Effect of loading parameters on the fatigue behavior of impact damaged composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00061-5 ↗
12. Slow-growth damage tolerance for fatigue after impact in FRP composites: Why current research won’t get us there10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103127 ↗
13. Federal Aviation Administration. Advisory circular AC20-107B composite aircraft structure; 2010.URL:https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_20-107B_with_change_1.pdf.
14. European Aviation Safety Agency. Annex II - AMC 20-29 to ED Decision 2010/003/R - EASA.
15. Shadowed delamination area estimation in ultrasonic C-scans of impacted composites validated by X-ray CT10.1177/0021998319865311 ↗
16. Observations of damage development from compression-after-impact experiments using ex situ micro-focus computed tomography10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.04.008 ↗
17. Saeedifar M, Zarouchas D. Damage characterization of laminated composites using acoustic emission: a review. In: Composites Part B: Engineering. Vol. 195. Elsevier Ltd; Aug. 15, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108039.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108039 ↗
18. Muir C et al. Damage mechanism identification in composites via machine learning and acoustic emission. npj Comput Mater 2021;7(1). Nature Research. doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x.10.1038/s41524-021-00565-x ↗
19. Clustering of interlaminar and intralaminar damages in laminated composites under indentation loading using Acoustic Emission10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.028 ↗
20. Simulation of acoustic emission in planar carbon fiber reinforced plastic specimens10.1007/s10921-010-0071-7 ↗
21. Arumugam V, Adhithya Plato Sidharth A, Santulli C. Characterization of failure modes in compression-after impact of glass–epoxy composite laminates using acoustic emission monitoring. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2015;37(5):1445–55. doi: 10.1007/s40430-014-0263-7.10.1007/s40430-014-0263-7 ↗
22. Biagini D, Pascoe J-A, Alderliesten R. Investigation of compression after impact failure in carbon fiber reinforced polymers using acoustic emission. J Compos Mater 2023:002199832311638. doi: 10.1177/00219983231163853.10.1177/00219983231163853 ↗
23. Damage assessment of NCF, 2D and 3D woven composites under compression after multiple-impact using acoustic emission10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105833 ↗
24. An introduction to wavelets10.1109/99.388960 ↗
25. Han L, Wong J, Bancroft JC. Time picking and random noise reduction on microseismic data; 2009.
26. Fusion-based damage diagnostics for stiffened composite panels10.1177/14759217211007127 ↗
27. Experimental investigation of fatigue after impact damage growth in CFRP