journal article·2024-09Open access

Impact of 3D printing parameters on static and fatigue properties of polylactic acid (PLA) bone scaffolds

Hamed Bakhtiari, Alireza Nouri, Majid Tolouei-Rad

Abstract

In the present study, polylactic acid (PLA) scaffolds with a 60 % porosity and gyroid pore structure were 3D printed using the extrusion-based method and employing various printing parameters. The specimens were loaded under quasit-static and cyclic conditions and their mechanical behaviour were evaluated. The Taguchi method was utilized to design experiments and investigate the impact of printing parameters on the compressive properties of the scaffolds. Moreover, thermography analysis was used to examine the influence of cyclic heating during fatigue experiments. The results indicated that extrusion width was the sole variable significantly affecting the quasi-static properties of scaffolds. The largest extrusion width (0.65 mm) resulted in the highest compressive properties (6–7 MPa), plateau stress (8–9 MPa), and compressive modulus (200–215 MPa). However, fatigue experiments revealed that nozzle temperature was the sole influencing factor on the fatigue performance of scaffolds, with specimens printed at low nozzle temperature (190 °C) demonstrating the highest fatigue resistance. Thermography analysis exhibited a negative correlation between scaffold temperature and stiffness. However, the impact of temperature on the structural integrity of the scaffolds was insignificant, given that the highest temperature recorded during fatigue cycles (i.e., 39 °C) was below the glass transition temperature of the scaffolds’ material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Corrarino · J Nurse Pract · 2015 · 11 · 96010.1016/j.nurpra.2015.07.009 ↗
2. Majd · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2023 · 141
3. Li · 2019 · 235
4. Bigham-Sadegh · Int Wound J · 2015 · 12 · 23810.1111/iwj.12231 ↗
5. Stahl · Tissue Eng B Rev · 2021 · 27 · 53910.1089/ten.teb.2020.0281 ↗
6. Graham · Expert Opin Biol Ther · 2010 · 10 · 88510.1517/14712598.2010.481669 ↗
7. Betz · Orthopedics · 2002 · 25 · S56110.3928/0147-7447-20020502-04 ↗
8. Albrektsson · Eur Spine J · 2001 · 10 · S9610.1007/s005860100282 ↗
9. Amini · Critical Rev.™ Biomed Eng · 2012 · 40
10. Nouri · 2010
11. Bakhtiari · Acta Biomater · 2023
12. Kalfas · Neurosurg Focus · 2001 · 10 · 110.3171/foc.2001.10.4.2 ↗
13. Chapter 10 - Scaffold Design and Fabrication
14. Nazari · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2016 · 63 · 15710.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.016 ↗
15. Feng · Mater Charact · 2014 · 97 · 4710.1016/j.matchar.2014.08.017 ↗
16. Nouri · J Mater Sci Technol · 2021 · 94 · 19610.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.058 ↗
17. El-Fiqi · Front Mater Sci · 2023 · 1710.1007/s11706-023-0644-x ↗
18. Zhang · Med. Novel Technol. Dev. · 2023 · 17
19. Alvarez · Materials · 2009 · 2 · 79010.3390/ma2030790 ↗
20. Zhang · Int J Mech Sci · 2021 · 19710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106331 ↗
21. Solórzano · Appl Sci · 2020 · 10 · 420810.3390/app10124208 ↗
22. Cullen · J Appl Physiol · 2001 · 91 · 197110.1152/jappl.2001.91.5.1971 ↗
23. Lin · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2020 · 11210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104003 ↗
24. Zhang · Materials · 2017 · 10 · 5010.3390/ma10010050 ↗
25. Baptista · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2021 · 11710.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104378 ↗
26. Hoey · Acta Biomater · 2009 · 5 · 71910.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.024 ↗
27. Zhao · Mater Lett · 2018 · 223 · 2110.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.205 ↗
28. Salmoria · Int J Adv Manuf Technol · 2013 · 65 · 152910.1007/s00170-012-4277-y ↗
29. Jiang · J Mater Process Technol · 2021 · 28910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116952 ↗
30. Marcucio · J Dent Res · 2023 · 102 · 1310.1177/00220345221125401 ↗
31. Younesi · Acta Biomater · 2016 · 30 · 21210.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.024 ↗
32. Panadero · J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater · 2016 · 104 · 33010.1002/jbm.b.33386 ↗
33. C. Erisken, D.M. Kalyon, H. Wang, (2010).
34. Shea · Tissue Eng · 2000 · 6 · 60510.1089/10763270050199550 ↗
35. Oryan · Biomed Environ Sci · 2015 · 28 · 57
36. Naghieh · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2016 · 59 · 24110.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.01.031 ↗
37. Carlier · Int J Pharm · 2019 · 565 · 36710.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.05.008 ↗
38. R. Winarso, P. Anggoro, R. Ismail, J. Jamari, A. Bayuseno, Heliyon (2022).
39. Bakhtiari · Polymers · 2023 · 15 · 382710.3390/polym15183827 ↗
40. Aihemaiti · Int. J. Bioprint. · 2022 · 8
41. Baptista · Bioprinting · 2020 · 20 · e0009610.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00096 ↗
42. Bakhtiari · Appl Sci · 2023 · 13 · 90410.3390/app13020904 ↗
43. Zheng · Heliyon · 2022 · 8
44. Baptista · Mater Sci Eng C · 2021 · 11810.1016/j.msec.2020.111528 ↗
45. Nomura · J Neurotrauma · 2006 · 23 · 49610.1089/neu.2006.23.496 ↗
46. Raise3D Premium PLA Technical Data Sheet, Tech. rep., Raise3D, 2023.
47. Karimipour-Fard · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2020 · 11210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104064 ↗
48. Yánez · Mater Des · 2018 · 140 · 2110.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.050 ↗
49. Vakrčka · Acta Polytechnica CTU Proceedings · 2020 · 26 · 12610.14311/APP.2020.26.0126 ↗
50. Hayashi · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2023 · 15 · 3457010.1021/acsami.3c06263 ↗
51. Zhang · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2022 · 42 · 671310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2022.07.033 ↗
52. Gupta · J. Eng. Sci. Med. Diagnos. Therapy · 2023 · 610.1115/1.4062614 ↗
53. Baumer · J. Funct. Biomater. · 2023 · 14 · 25110.3390/jfb14050251 ↗
54. A. Standard, Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics (2016).
55. Hany · Biomater. J. · 2023 · 2 · 53
56. Will · 2013 · 299
57. Michel · J Biomech · 1993 · 26 · 45310.1016/0021-9290(93)90009-4 ↗
58. S. Bowman, X. Guo, D. Cheng, T. Keaveny, L. Gibson, W. Hayes, T. McMahon, (1998).
59. Haddock · J Biomech · 2004 · 37 · 18110.1016/S0021-9290(03)00245-8 ↗
60. Chao · J. Funct. Biomater. · 2023 · 14 · 2810.3390/jfb14010028 ↗
61. A. Standard, Standard guide for assessing microstructure of polymeric scaffolds for use in tissue-engineered medical products. Book ASTM Standards 13 (2010) 1-0.
62. Sun · Int J Impact Eng · 2018 · 112 · 7410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.006 ↗
63. Nouri · 2008
64. Rodrigo · Thin-Walled Struct · 2023 · 19210.1016/j.tws.2023.111132 ↗
65. Wohlford · 2018
66. Impact of Cellular Materials
67. Habib · Mater Des · 2018 · 155 · 8610.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.059 ↗
68. Vesenjak · Polym Test · 2010 · 29 · 99110.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.09.001 ↗
69. Hammetter · J Appl Mech · 2013 · 8010.1115/1.4007865 ↗
70. Rapillard · J Biomech · 2006 · 39 · 213310.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.033 ↗
71. Shiri · Mater Des · 2015 · 88 · 129010.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.114 ↗
72. D.A. Shimko, E.A. Nauman, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials 80 (2007) 360-369.
73. Ariffin · Int J Mod Manuf Technol · 2019 · 11 · 9
74. Gong · J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Ed. · 2017 · 28 · 219610.1080/09205063.2017.1388993 ↗
75. Dadashi · Progress Add. Manuf. · 2023 · 8 · 25510.1007/s40964-022-00327-1 ↗
76. Elhattab · Polymers · 2022 · 14 · 122210.3390/polym14061222 ↗
77. Identification of mechanical and fatigue characteristics of polymers fabricated by additive manufacturing process
78. Jerez-Mesa · Procedia Manuf · 2017 · 13 · 87210.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.146 ↗
79. Travieso-Rodriguez · J Mater Res Technol · 2020 · 9 · 850710.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.003 ↗
80. Travieso-Rodriguez · Materials · 2019 · 12 · 385910.3390/ma12233859 ↗
81. He · Polymers · 2021 · 13 · 236210.3390/polym13142362 ↗
82. Galetz · Adv Eng Mater · 2007 · 9 · 108910.1002/adem.200700274 ↗
83. Janssen · Macromolecules · 2008 · 41 · 252010.1021/ma071273i ↗
84. Wang · J Soc Mater Sci, Jpn · 2000 · 49 · 3510.2472/jsms.49.3Appendix_35 ↗