journal article·2022-10Open access

Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy

Danilo A. Renzo, Carmine Maletta, Emanuele Sgambitterra, Franco Furgiuele, Filippo Berto

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is a special technology that offers several advantages compared to the conventional methodologies. For instance, it allows to build components with complex geometry, difficult to make in a different way, build integrated parts deleting joining issues, etc. However, its application in engineering fields is still limited because the dependency between the mechanical properties of the obtained components and the manufacturing parameters is not in depth understood. Improve the performances of AM components, under static and dynamic loadings, is crucial to ensure their durability and reliability and in recent years it became a challenging research field. In this work, the effect of the surface roughness on the multiaxial fatigue resistance of Ti6Al4V thin-walled tubular samples, made by the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) process, was investigated. In particular, experiments under combined axial–torsional loadings were carried out on two batches of samples, made by different surface roughness (machined and as built samples). Maximum valley depth Rv was used as a representative parameter of the surface roughness as it geometrically represents a stress concentration zone where crack initiates and propagates. An effective strain intensity factor range, based on the modified Smith Watson and Topper (MSWT) model, that includes the roughness parameter Rv, is proposed and used for a better correlation of the fatigue data. To prove the reliability of the proposed model, the Socie and the Reddy & Fatemi effective strain-based intensity factor range were also used but a bigger scattering of results was observed. The MSWT model was also applied to predict the failure plane and the obtained results were compared with the predictions of the Fatemi-Socie model. Results revealed that, for SLM Ti6Al4V alloy components, the MSWT model is more accurate. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Donachie · 2000
2. Additive manufacturing of structural materials10.1016/j.mser.2020.100596 ↗
3. Design of graded lattice structure with optimized mesostructures for additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.011 ↗
4. Three-dimensional printing of metals for biomedical applications10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100024 ↗
5. Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008 ↗
6. Performances analysis of titanium prostheses manufactured by superplastic forming and incremental forming10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.057 ↗
7. Hybrid additive manufacturing
8. Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024 ↗
9. The additive manufacturing (AM) of titanium alloys
10. Multiaxial fatigue of additive manufactured metals10.1051/matecconf/201930001003 ↗
11. New scanning strategy to reduce warpage in additive manufacturing
12. Reduction of the residual porosity in parts manufactured by selective laser melting using skywriting and high focus offset strategies10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.090 ↗
13. Post processing methods used to improve surface finish of products which are manufactured by additive manufacturing technologies: a review
14. Proposal for a standardized test artifact for additive manufacturing machines and processes
15. Standardization in additive manufacturing: activities carried out by international organizations and projects10.1007/s00170-014-6334-1 ↗
16. Analysis of the surface roughness on fatigue performance of powder bed fusion additive manufactured metals10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102638 ↗
17. Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti6Al4V10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053 ↗
18. Application of mechanical surface finishing processes for roughness reduction and fatigue improvement of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V parts10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.008 ↗
19. Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additive manufactured metals and its modeling10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102260 ↗
20. Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
21. Fatigue performance of additive manufactured TiAl6V4 using electron and laser beam melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.001 ↗
22. ASTM E2207 - 15. Standard practice for strain-controlled axial-torsional testing with thin walled tube specimens. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society of Testing and Materials 2006: 03(01): 1252–9.
23. Additive manufacturing of Ti6Al4V alloy: a review10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
24. A model for rolling contact failure10.1016/S0043-1648(98)00311-1 ↗
25. A fatigue criterion for general multiaxial loading10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00247.x ↗
26. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ61A magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.020 ↗
27. Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.028 ↗
28. Multiaxial fatigue life assessment of sintered porous iron under proportional and non-proportional loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.005 ↗
29. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part II: The relationship between microstructure, material cyclic properties, and component performance10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105363 ↗
30. Fatigue life of titanium alloys fabricated by additive layer manufacturing techniques for dental implants10.1007/s11661-012-1470-4 ↗
31. Mixed mode small crack growth10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb01145.x ↗
32. Mixed mode fatigue crack growth: a literature survey10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00071-9 ↗
33. Stephens RI, Fatemi A, Stephens RR, Fuchs HO, Metal fatigue in engineering, second ed., AWiley-Interscience Publication.
34. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
35. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of SLM Ti6Al4V alloy under different loading conditions10.1111/ffe.13518 ↗
36. McDowell D, Ellis J, editors. STP1191-EB advances in multiaxial fatigue. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 1993. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP1191-EB.10.1520/STP1191-EB ↗
37. A general fatigue theory and its application to out-of-phase cyclic loading10.1115/1.2904239 ↗
38. Multiaxial fatigue modeling for Nitinol shape memory alloys under in-phase loading10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.022 ↗
39. Deformation and fatigue behaviors of case-hardened steels in torsion: experiments and predictions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.020 ↗
40. Initiation of fatigue cracks in commercial aluminium alloys and the subsequent propagation of very short cracks10.1016/0013-7944(75)90004-1 ↗
41. Murakami · 2019