Weld defect frequency, size statistics and probabilistic models for ship structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Ships undergo cyclic loading which combined with weld defects can cause fatigue failure. Remaining fatigue life of structures containing defects can be estimated using the defect size. The defect data for ships is non-existent in literature or belong to old offshore structures. In this research, the data collected from two ships are presented. The statistical analysis of the data shows that the Hybrid Laser Welding has lower defect rates than other common arc welding processes indicating that less quality control inspection may be allowed. The defect length values from the studied ships were smaller than those from offshore structures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. BSI7608 · 2015
2. Béghin · 2010
3. A review of nondestructive examination methods for new-building ships undergoing classification society survey
4. Jr. AFG. Fundamentals Of Structural Integrity: Damage Tolerant Design And Nondestructive Evaluation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken; 2003.
5. Risk-based optimization of inspection planning in ships
6. Influence of weld quality on the fatigue strength in seam welds10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.12.001 ↗
7. Influence of weld quality on the fatigue strength of thin normal and high strength steel butt joints
8. Development of weld quality criteria based on fatigue performance10.1007/BF03321545 ↗
9. ISO B (2007) 6520-1. Welding and allied processes: Classification of geometric imperfections in metallic materials. Brussels; 2007.
10. Mandal · 2017
11. Jonsson · 2016
12. BSI. PD ISO/TS 20273:2017 Guidelines on weld quality in relationship to fatigue strength; 2017.
13. British Standard. BS 7910:2019. Br Stand Institutions, London; 2019.
14. Hobbacher · 2016
15. Boekholt · 1996
16. State-of-the-art automatic arc welding processes meet the latest shipbuilding requirements
17. Olsen · 2009
18. Zhao W, Stacey A. Review of defect distributions for probabilistic structural integrity assessment. In: ASME 2002 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering; 2002. pp 607–619.10.1115/OMAE2002-28616 ↗
19. Wintle J. A review of methods for determining the frequency and size distribution of welding flaws in steel fabrications; 2002.
20. Repair rates in welded construction - an analysis of industry trends
21. Rummel WD, Matzkanin GA. Nondestructive evaluation (NDE) capabilities data book (NTIAC: DB-97-02). NTIAC 625; 1997.
22. DNV. DNVGL-RP-C210-Probabilistic methods for planning of inspection for fatigue cracks in offshore structures; 2015.
23. Baker, Kountouris, Ohmart. Weld Defects in An Offshore Structure, A Detailed Study. In: Int. Conf. On Behavior of Offshore Structures; 1988.
24. Marshall W. An assessment of the integrity of PWR pressure vessels; 1982.
25. Bokalrud T, Karlsen A. Probabilistic fracture mechanics evaluation of fatigue failure from weld defects in butt welded joints. In: Proc. Conf. on fitness for purpose validation of welded constructions; 1982.
26. Weld defect distributions in offshore structures and their influence on structural reliability
27. Moan T, Vårdal OT, Hellevig N-C, Skjoldli K. In-service observations of cracks in north sea jackets. A study on initial crack depth and POD values. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering; 1997. pp 189–198.
28. Baker M, Stanley I. Assessing and modelling the uncertainty in fatigue crack growth in structural steels. Heal Saf Exec Res Rep RR643, Norwich; 2008.
29. Probabilistic fracture mechanics
30. Amirafshari P. Application of probabilistic fracture mechanics in risk based non destructive examination of new building ships. In: 3rd NSIRC Conference; 2017.
31. Wallin K. Fracture toughness of engineering materials: Estimation and application. EMAS publishing; 2011.
32. Zhao W, Stacey A, Prakash P. Probabilistic models of uncertainties in fatigue and fracture reliability analysis. In: ASME 2002 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering; 2002. pp 557–578.10.1115/OMAE2002-28611 ↗
33. Kountouris IS, Baker MJ. Defect assessment: analysis of the dimensions of defects detected by ultrasonic inspection in an offshore structure. Imperial College of Science and Technology Engineering Structures Laboratories; 1989.
34. Naess A. Fatigue handbook: offshore steel structures; 1985.
35. Lassen · 2013
36. Glenn IF. Fatigue resistant detail design guide for ship structures. Ship Structure Committee; 1999.
37. Estimation of crack propagation in a passenger ship’s door corner10.1080/17445300902891457 ↗
38. Investigation of the MV KURDISTAN Casualty
39. Townend · 1980
40. Becher PE, Hansen B. Statistical evaluation of defects in welds and design implications. Riso Danish Atomic energy commission research establishment; 1974.
41. Kountouris IS, Baker MJ. Defect assessment: analysis of the dimensions of defects detected by magnetic particle inspection in an offshore structure. Imperial College of Science and Technology Engineering Structures Laboratories; 1989.
42. Burdekin FM, Towned PH. Reliability aspects of fracture on stress concentration regions in offshore structures, integrity of offshore structures, 2nd Int. In: Symp., Glasgow; 1981.
43. Precautions for avoidance of fracture of pressure vessels
44. Gurney · 1979
45. BCSA · 2012
46. Amirafshari · 2019
47. Chapter 8 - Weld Defects and Inspection