Estimations of fatigue life and variability under random loading in aluminum Al-2024T351 using strip yield models from NASGRO
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper is concerned with the application of the strip yield models implemented in NASGRO to estimate fatigue crack growth under random loading. The two different strip yield model options (constant constraint-loss (CCL) and variable constraint-loss (VCL)) implemented in the software are considered and compared. In addition, three crack grow rate relations, obtained from constant amplitude data, the NASGRO material database and the literature, were also considered and compared. The capacity of the models to estimate the fatigue life and variability is analyzed by comparing simulated results with experimental data of fatigue crack growth under different stationary Gaussian random load processes on compact, C(T), specimens of aluminum alloy 2024-T351. The analysis performed showed that both model options provide very similar good fatigue life predictions. The estimated fatigue lives are within ±13% of the test lives with the best option. The variability of the results due to the randomness of the load is also analyzed. In this case, the variable constraint-loss option provides better estimation than the constant constraint-loss option.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. The significance of fatigue crack closure
2. FASTRAN II—a fatigue crack growth structural analysis program
3. NASGRO 6.0, Reference Manual (version 6.02, September 2010), Fracture mechanics and fatigue crack growth analysis software, NASA Johnson Space Center and Southwest Research Institute; 2010.
4. Effect of load histories on scatter of fatigue crack growth in aluminum alloy 2024-T351
5. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
6. Fatigue crack growth prediction models for metallic materials Part II: Strip yield model – choices and decisions10.1111/ffe.12009 ↗
7. On the use of the strip-yield model to predict fatigue crack growth under irregular loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00306.x ↗
8. Application of the strip-yield model from the NASGRO software to predict fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloys under constant and variable amplitude loading10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.06.014 ↗
9. Moreno B, Zapatero J, Lopez-Crespo P, Dominguez J. On the application of the strip-yield model from NASGRO and FASTRAN software for fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on material and component performance under variable amplitude loading. Darmstadt, Germany; 2009.
10. Effects of crack closure on fatigue crack-growth predictions for 2024-T351 aluminum alloy panels under spectrum loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.026 ↗
11. Fatigue crack growth and life predictions under variable amplitude loading for a cast and wrought aluminum alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.03.005 ↗
12. Numerical and experimental analysis of the fatigue crack growth under random loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.12.008 ↗
13. Predictions of fatigue crack growth in aluminium alloy 2024-T351 using constraint factors10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00134-7 ↗
14. An experimental analysis of fatigue crack growth under random loading10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00018-5 ↗
15. A crack opening stress equation for fatigue crack growth10.1007/BF00020751 ↗
16. Donald · 2009
17. Crack-growth calculations in 7075-T7351 aluminum alloy under various load spectra using an improved crack-closure model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.01.004 ↗