Very high cycle fatigue properties of bearing steel with different aluminum and sulfur content
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study aims to clarify the effects of aluminum and sulfur content on fatigue property together with corresponding crack initiation and propagation behavior of bearing steel in the very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) regime. For these purposes, ultrasonic tensile-compression fatigue tests were carried out on fatigue specimens with different directions extracted from bearing steel bars containing different aluminum and sulfur content. As a result, high aluminum content in bearing steel leads to worse fatigue property by forming a large collection area of Al2O3 particles. MnS inclusions can cause fatigue failure of low sulfur bearing steel at the 45-degree angle and contribute to fatigue anisotropy. However, there are no MnS inclusions to be found at crack initiation region of failed specimens with ultralow sulfur content. For the VHCF fracture of bearing steel, fracture surface can be simply divided into four different areas according to crack propagation path except fatigue source. The stress intensity factor at the periphery of fine granular area (FGA) ΔKFGA can be regarded as the critical driving force for crack propagating through martensite laths. In addition, crack initiation and propagation are the result of mutual coordination and matching of the driving force ΔK, crack propagation speed and microstructure. Dislocations and precipitated carbides play an important role in the formation of FGA by helping form the corresponding nanoscale grain boundary.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Murakami · 2002
2. Murakami · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 1999 · 22 · 58110.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00187.x ↗
3. Spriestersbach · Int J Fatigue · 2014 · 64 · 11410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.003 ↗
4. Hashimoto · Mater Des · 2011 · 32 · 160510.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.052 ↗
5. Uesugi · Trans ISIJ · 1988 · 28 · 89310.2355/isijinternational1966.28.893 ↗
6. Study of evaluating method for non-metallic inclusions and development of slag refining for bearing steel
7. Pessard · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 529 · 28910.1016/j.msea.2011.09.031 ↗
8. Pessard · Int J Fatigue · 2012 · 41 · 16810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.01.005 ↗
9. Cyril · Int J Fatigue · 2009 · 31 · 52610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.001 ↗
10. Furuya · Metall Mater Trans A · 2004 · 35a · 373710.1007/s11661-004-0279-1 ↗
11. Temmel · Metall Mater Trans A · 2006 · 37a · 299510.1007/s11661-006-0181-0 ↗
12. Sakai · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 76510.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00574.x ↗
13. Shiozawa · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2001 · 24 · 78110.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00459.x ↗
14. Murakami · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 73510.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00576.x ↗
15. Ochi · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 82310.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00575.x ↗
16. Tanaka · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 77510.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00547.x ↗
17. Shiozawa · Int J Fatigue · 2006 · 28 · 152110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.08.015 ↗
18. Li · Mater Sci Technol · 2013 · 29 · 146310.1179/1743284713Y.0000000297 ↗
19. Nakajima · Int J Fatigue · 2006 · 28 · 154010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.017 ↗
20. Hong · Int J Fatigue · 2014 · 58 · 14410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.02.023 ↗
21. Li · J Mater Sci · 2010 · 45 · 83110.1007/s10853-009-4007-5 ↗
22. Furuya · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 172210.1007/s11661-007-9225-3 ↗
23. Yang · Int J Fatigue · 2008 · 30 · 101610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.011 ↗
24. Liu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 358 · 93510.1016/j.msea.2010.10.017 ↗
25. Li · Int J Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 109610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.008 ↗
26. Bandara · Eng Fail Anal · 2014 · 45 · 42110.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.015 ↗
27. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 504410.1016/j.msea.2011.03.020 ↗
28. Li · Int J Fatigue · 2016 · 82 · 40210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.021 ↗
29. Grad · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 83810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.049 ↗
30. Hong · Int J Fatigue · 2016 · 89 · 10810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.029 ↗
31. Wang · Acta Metall Sin · 2013 · 49 · 89710.3724/SP.J.1037.2013.00107 ↗
32. Ma · Int J Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 111610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.005 ↗
33. Li · Int Mater Rev · 2012 · 57 · 9210.1179/1743280411Y.0000000008 ↗
34. Turkdogan · 1980
35. Tofique · Int J Fatigue · 2017 · 100 · 23810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.037 ↗
36. Murakami · Trans Jpn Soc Mech Eng · 1998 · 54 · 698
37. Cheng · 2006
38. Tsushima · JSME Int J Ser C · 1993 · 36 · 110.1299/jsmeb.36.1 ↗
39. Zhang · Phys Test Chem Anal · 1994 · 30 · 26