journal article·2021-10

A probabilistic fatigue life prediction for adhesively bonded joints via ANNs-based hybrid model

Karthik Reddy Lyathakula, Fuh-Gwo Yuan

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The paper is aimed at developing an efficient and robust probabilistic fatigue life prediction framework for adhesively bonded joints. This framework calibrates the fatigue life model by quantifying uncertainty in the fatigue damage evolution relation using a set of experimental fatigue life data. Probabilistic assessment of fatigue life is simulated through damage evolution along the bondline and Bayesian inference via the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling method for inverse uncertainty quantification (UQ). To expedite the fatigue life simulation, a hybrid model composed of physics-based fatigue damage evolution relation and a data-driven artificial neural networks (ANNs) model is employed. The degradation of the adhesive is evaluated by the fatigue damage evolution relation which is then mapped to the strain redistribution along the bondline using the ANNs model. Once the mapping is learned by the ANNs, through data from FEA simulations, the probabilistic fatigue life prediction framework involves three successive modules: (I) fatigue damage growth (FDG) simulator, (II) uncertainty quantification (UQ), and (III) confidence bounds for fatigue life prediction. The FDG simulator can be used for simulating fatigue degradation rapidly for a given geometric configuration under any arbitrary fatigue loading spectra. The quantified uncertainties from the framework correspond to the intrinsic statistical material properties that can be used for probabilistic fatigue life prediction in any joint configuration with the same adhesive material. The probabilistic framework is verified using a single lap joint (SLJ) by quantifying uncertainties which are then used for probabilistic fatigue life prediction in laminated doublers in the bending (LDB) joint, that uses the same adhesive material as SLJ, and successfully compared with experimental data. The framework is also tested and validated by estimating probabilistic fatigue life in other joint configurations under constant and variable amplitude fatigue loading spectra.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
2. Smith RC. Uncertainty quantification: Theory, implementation, and applications. Vol 1Siam; 2013.10.1137/1.9781611973228 ↗
3. Leser PE. Probabilistic prognostics and health management for fatigue-critical components using high-fidelity models. [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina State University; 2017.
4. Ebnesajjad · 2014
5. The effects of manufacturing-induced and in-service related bonding quality reduction on the mode-I fracture toughness of composite bonded joints for aeronautical use10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.052 ↗
6. Environmental effect on the fatigue degradation of adhesive joints: A review10.1080/00218464.2016.1179117 ↗
7. Uncertainty reduction of damage growth properties using structural health monitoring10.2514/1.C000279 ↗
8. Fatigue damage prognosis of adhesively bonded joints via a surrogate model
9. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction for adhesively bonded joints via surrogate model
10. Chopin · 2020
11. Efficient sequential monte-carlo samplers for bayesian inference10.1109/TSP.2015.2504342 ↗
12. Leser PE, Hochhalter JD, Warner JE, Bomarito GF, Leser WP, Yuan F. Sequential monte carlo: Enabling real-time and high-fidelity prognostics. 2018;10(1).10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.564 ↗
13. Kaipio J, Somersalo E. Statistical and computational inverse problems. Vol 160. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.10.1007/b138659 ↗
14. Probabilistic fatigue damage prognosis using surrogate models trained via three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1177/1475921716643298 ↗
15. Identifying parameters of advanced soil models using an enhanced transitional markov chain monte carlo method10.1007/s11440-019-00847-1 ↗
16. Uncertainty quantification of simplified viscoelastic continuum damage fatigue model using the bayesian inference-based markov chain monte carlo method10.1177/0361198120910149 ↗
17. COVID-19, uncertainty, and the need for resilience-based thinking in pavement engineering10.1061/JPEODX.0000235 ↗
18. SynCity: Using open data to create a synthetic city of hourly building energy estimates by integrating data-driven and physics-based methods10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115981 ↗
19. Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.014 ↗
20. Comparison of various surrogate models to predict stress intensity factor of a crack propagating in offshore piping10.1115/1.4037290 ↗
21. Leser PE, Hochhalter JD, Warner JE, Bomarito GF, Leser WP, Yuan F. Sequential monte carlo: Enabling real-time and high-fidelity prognostics. 2018;10(1).10.36001/phmconf.2018.v10i1.564 ↗
22. Uncertainty identification of damage growth parameters using nonlinear regression10.2514/1.J051268 ↗
23. Comparison of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression10.1002/cem.3226 ↗
24. Gardner JR, Pleiss G, Wu R, Weinberger KQ, Wilson AG. Product kernel interpolation for scalable gaussian processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08903. 2018.
25. State of health estimation for li-ion battery using incremental capacity analysis and gaussian process regression10.1016/j.energy.2019.116467 ↗
26. Enhanced fuzzy-filtered neural networks for material fatigue prognosis10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.031 ↗
27. Impact diagnosis in stiffened structural panels using a deep learning approach
28. A deep learning approach for impact diagnosis
29. Dana S, Kadeethum T. Physics informed deep learning for coupled flow and poromechanics.mandel’s problem. 2021.10.31224/osf.io/4yvnu ↗
30. Prediction of lap shear strength and impact peel strength of epoxy adhesive by machine learning approach10.3390/nano11040872 ↗
31. Failure load prediction of single lap adhesive joints using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.aej.2016.04.029 ↗
32. The use of neural networks in the analysis of dual adhesive single lap joints subjected to uniaxial tensile test10.3390/ma14020419 ↗
33. Fatigue behavior of carbon fibre reinforced plastic and aluminum single-lap adhesive joints after the transverse pre-impact10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105973 ↗
34. Assessing stress state and mean load effects on the fatigue response of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00049-9 ↗
35. Da Silva LF, Campilho RD. Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints. In: Advances in numerical modeling of adhesive joints. Springer; 2012. Pp. 1-93.10.1007/978-3-642-23608-2_1 ↗
36. Fatigue performance and life estimation of automotive adhesive joints using a fracture mechanics approach10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.01.005 ↗
37. A finite element study of fatigue crack propagation in single lap bonded joint with process-induced disbond10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.10.005 ↗
38. Dana S, Wheeler MF. Augmented lagrangian for treatment of hanging nodes in hexahedral meshes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04031. 2018.
39. A review of finite fracture mechanics: Crack initiation at singular and non-singular stress raisers10.1007/s00419-015-1091-7 ↗
40. Fatigue life and backface strain predictions in adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.08.001 ↗
41. A new framework based on continuum damage mechanics and XFEM for high cycle fatigue crack growth simulations10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.021 ↗
42. A generalised damage model for constant amplitude fatigue loading of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.003 ↗
43. A review of finite element analysis of adhesively bonded joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.006 ↗
44. Failure prediction of adhesively bonded CFRP-aluminum alloy joints using cohesive zone model with consideration of temperature effect10.1080/00218464.2018.1440212 ↗
45. Numerical analysis of mixed-mode fatigue crack growth of adhesive joints using CZM10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102493 ↗
46. A machine learning approach as a surrogate for a finite element analysis: Status of research and application to one dimensional systems10.3390/s21051654 ↗
47. A finite element-based machine learning approach for modeling the mechanical behavior of the breast tissues under compression in real-time10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.019 ↗
48. A framework for modelling the biomechanical behaviour of the human liver during breathing in real time using machine learning10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.037 ↗
49. Smart finite elements: A novel machine learning application10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.046 ↗
50. Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning10.1016/j.cma.2017.08.040 ↗
51. Data-driven computational mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001 ↗
52. A digital twin feasibility study (part II): Non-deterministic predictions of fatigue life using in-situ diagnostics and prognostics10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106903 ↗
53. Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction10.1109/TR.2014.2299152 ↗
54. Surrogate modeling of 3D crack growth10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.012 ↗
55. Two-stage planar approximation of non-planar crack growth10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.017 ↗
56. Fatigue damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints under variable amplitude loading using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.09.008 ↗
57. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
58. Mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites under fatigue loading10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00021-3 ↗
59. Numerical simulation of fatigue-driven delamination using interface elements10.1002/nme.1338 ↗
60. Predicting fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints using a cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
61. Khoramishad H. Modelling fatigue damage in adhesively bonded joints. University of Surrey (United Kingdom); 2010.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.013 ↗
62. Augmented reality for enhanced visual inspection through knowledge-based deep learning
63. An efficient augmented reality (AR) system for enhanced visual inspection
64. Yuan FG, Zargar SA, Chen Q, Wang S. Machine learning for structural health monitoring: challenges and opportunities. In: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2020, vol. 11379. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2020, p. 1137903.10.1117/12.2561610 ↗
65. Demonstration of prognostics health monitoring (PHM) in adhesive lap joints using simulated studies
66. Integration of structural health monitoring and fatigue damage prognosis10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.10.001 ↗
67. An evaluation of strength wearout models for the lifetime prediction of adhesive joints subjected to variable amplitude fatigue10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.008 ↗
68. Probabilistic programming in python using PyMC310.7717/peerj-cs.55 ↗
69. Van Rossum · 2003
70. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. . 2016:265-283.
71. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980. 2014.
72. Bansal JC. Particle swarm optimization. In: Evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Springer; 2019. Pp. 11-23.10.1007/978-3-319-91341-4_2 ↗
73. Jeffers J, Reinders J. Intel xeon phi coprocessor high performance programming. Newnes; 2013.10.1016/B978-0-12-410414-3.00010-4 ↗
74. PyMC: Bayesian stochastic modelling in python10.18637/jss.v035.i04 ↗
75. On thinning of chains in MCMC