Defect criticality analysis on fatigue life of L-PBF 17-4 PH stainless steel via machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 ↗
2. P. K. Rao, J. P. Liu, D. Roberson, Z. J. Kong, and C. Williams, “Online real-time quality monitoring in additive manufacturing processes using heterogeneous sensors,” Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, vol. 137, no. 6, 2015.10.1115/1.4029823 ↗
3. Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 ↗
4. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs10.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
5. An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control
6. R. DeVor, S. Kapoor, J. Cao, and K. Ehmann, “Transforming the landscape of manufacturing: distributed manufacturing based on desktop manufacturing (DM) 2,” Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, vol. 134, no. 4, 2012.10.1115/1.4006095 ↗
7. Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.06.001 ↗
8. “Additive Manufacturing Market by Technology ” AMPOWER Report, , 2020. [Online]. Available: https://additive-manufacturing-report.com/additive-manufacturing-market/.
9. Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: Challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
10. Fatigue properties of AlSi10Mg obtained by additive manufacturing: Defect-based modelling and prediction of fatigue strength10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.002 ↗
11. Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography characterization of the effect of processing variables on porosity formation in laser power-bed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V10.1007/s11837-016-2234-1 ↗
12. Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.026 ↗
13. Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
14. A. du Plessis, I. Yadroitsava, and I. Yadroitsev, “Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: A review focusing on X-ray tomography insights,” Materials & Design, vol. 187, pp. 108385-108385, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108385.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108385 ↗
15. Fatigue life prediction for AlSi10Mg components produced by selective laser melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.015 ↗
16. N. Sanaei, A. Fatemi, and N. Phan, “Defect characteristics and analysis of their variability in metal L-PBF additive manufacturing,” Materials & Design, vol. 182, pp. 108091-108091, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108091.10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108091 ↗
17. S. Tammas-Williams, P. J. Withers, I. Todd, and P. B. Prangnell, “The Influence of Porosity on Fatigue Crack Initiation in Additively Manufactured Titanium Components,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7308-7308, 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06504-5.10.1038/s41598-017-06504-5 ↗
18. Quantification and characterisation of porosity in selectively laser melted Al–Si10–Mg using X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.001 ↗
19. An investigation into specimen property to part performance relationships for laser beam powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
20. Fatigue behaviour of additive manufactured materials: An overview of some recent experimental studies on Ti-6Al-4V considering various processing and loading direction effects10.1111/ffe.13000 ↗
21. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part II: The relationship between microstructure, material cyclic properties, and component performance10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105363 ↗
22. Fatigue of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V, Part I: The effects of powder feedstock, manufacturing, and post-process conditions on the resulting microstructure and defects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105358 ↗
23. C. M. Bishop, Pattern recognition and machine learning. springer, 2006.
24. R. I. Stephens, A. Fatemi, R. R. Stephens, and H. O. Fuchs, Metal fatigue in engineering. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
25. J. Tavernelli and L. Coffin Jr, “Experimental support for generalized equation predicting low cycle fatigue,” 1962.10.1115/1.3658701 ↗
26. R. Wei, “Fracture mechanics approach to fatigue analysis in design,” 1978.10.1115/1.3443458 ↗
27. S. Bhat and R. Patibandla, “Metal fatigue and basic theoretical models: a review,” Alloy Steel-Properties and Use, vol. 22, 2011.10.5772/28911 ↗
28. Defects as a root cause of fatigue failure of metallic components. I: Basic aspects10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.01.055 ↗
29. H. Kitagawa, “Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or the cracks in the early stage,” Proc. of 2nd ICM, Cleveland, 1976, pp. 627-631, 1976.
30. Murakami · 2019
31. Small defects and inhomogeneities in fatigue strength: experiments, models and statistical implications10.1023/A:1009976418553 ↗
32. Non-destructive characterization of process-induced defects and their effect on the fatigue behavior of austenitic steel 316L made by laser-powder bed fusion10.1007/s40964-019-00105-6 ↗
33. Qualification of AM parts: Extreme value statistics applied to tomographic measurements10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091 ↗
34. A new approach to correlate the defect population with the fatigue life of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105584 ↗
35. Fatigue strength prediction of laser powder bed fusion processed Inconel 625 specimens with intentionally-seeded porosity: Feasibility study10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105394 ↗
36. Overview on microstructure-and defect-sensitive fatigue modeling of additively manufactured materials10.1007/s11837-018-2987-9 ↗
37. Impact of single structural voids on fatigue properties of AISI 316L manufactured by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106207 ↗
38. A multi-scale crystal plasticity model for cyclic plasticity and low-cycle fatigue in a precipitate-strengthened steel at elevated temperature10.1016/j.jmps.2016.12.010 ↗
39. Cyclic plasticity experiments and polycrystal plasticity modeling of three distinct Ti alloy microstructures10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.10.004 ↗
40. Multiscale crystalline plasticity for materials design
41. A mesoscale approach for growth of 3D microstructurally small fatigue cracks in polycrystals10.1177/1056789513513916 ↗
42. Direct comparison of microstructure-sensitive fatigue crack initiation via crystal plasticity simulations and in situ high-energy X-ray experiments10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109216 ↗
43. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
44. C. Wang, X. Tan, S. Tor, and C. Lim, “Machine learning in additive manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives,” Additive Manufacturing, p. 101538, 2020.10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538 ↗
45. A Survey of Shape Feature Extraction Techniques
46. Fatigue crack growth behavior of additively manufactured 17–4 PH stainless steel: Effects of build orientation and microstructure10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.015 ↗
47. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured 17–4 PH stainless steel: Synergistic effects of surface roughness and heat treatment10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.039 ↗
48. Association, correlation and causation10.1038/nmeth.3587 ↗
49. Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets10.1126/science.1205438 ↗
50. Support vector regression machines
51. Awad · 2015 · 67
52. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
53. Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning
54. Fatigue data for laser beam powder bed fused 17–4 PH stainless steel specimens in different heat treatment and surface roughness conditions10.1016/j.dib.2019.104215 ↗
55. Fatigue behavior of additively manufactured 17–4 PH stainless steel: The effects of part location and powder re-use
56. Astm · 2016
57. Effects of pore position in depth on stress/strain concentration and fatigue crack initiation10.1007/s11661-011-0947-x ↗
58. “Layer-wise spatial modeling of porosity in additive manufacturing”10.1080/24725854.2018.1478169 ↗