Investigation of particle fracture during fatigue of aluminum 2024
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A significant portion of the mechanical energy that enters into a material subjected to fatigue is expended to nucleate local, early-state damage which is distinct from later observed catastrophic type damage frequently targeted in fatigue investigations. Therefore, identification of early signs of fatigue damage combined with means to monitor its evolution is crucial for understanding the influence of material microstructure on the development of progressive pre-failure sites that can ultimately lead to conditions that favor the development of fatigue damage. In this context, in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) testing combined with microstructure-sensitive nondestructive evaluation (NDE) is leveraged, in this article, to allow the direct observation of fatigue damage incubation in a precipitate-hardened aluminum alloy, Al 2024-T3. To validate surface observations of such early signs of damage, X-ray Micro-Computed Tomography (μ-CT) scans were made to investigate the relation between particle size and chemical balance with local grain structure and crystallography. In addition, an effort was made to explore the effect of specimen geometry and loading schemes on the occurrence of particle fracture activity as well its evolution throughout the early stages of the specimen life. Furthermore, a machine learning approach was developed in an attempt to post-process the available NDE data and relate it to particle fracture activity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Microstructure-sensitive computational modeling of fatigue crack formation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.003 ↗
2. Micromechanisms of multistage fatigue crack growth in a high-strength aluminum alloy10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.009 ↗
3. In-situ fatigue in an environmental scanning electron microscope - potential and current limitations10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.008 ↗
4. In situ SEM testing for crack closure investigation and virtual crack annealing model development10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.003 ↗
5. Investigation of incremental fatigue crack growth mechanisms using in situ SEM testing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.03.004 ↗
6. Crystallographic analysis for fatigue small crack growth behaviors of a nickel-based single crystal by in situ SEM observation10.1016/j.tafmec.2013.11.002 ↗
7. Observations of fatigue crack initiation in 7075–T65110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.003 ↗
8. In situ microscopic investigation to validate acoustic emission monitoring10.1007/s11340-015-0074-5 ↗
9. Microstructure-based multistage fatigue modeling of aluminum alloy 7075–T65110.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.031 ↗
10. Acoustic emission and digital image correlation as complementary techniques for laboratory and field research
11. Rajaram S, Vanniamparambil PA, Khan F, Bolhassani M, Koutras A, Bartoli I, et al. Full-field deformation measurements during seismic loading of masonry buildings. Struct Control Health Monit, (2016) n/a–n/a.10.1002/stc.1903 ↗
12. A data fusion approach for progressive damage quantification in reinforced concrete masonry walls10.1088/0964-1726/23/1/015007 ↗
13. Acoustic emission generated during the tensile testing of aluminium alloys10.1016/0025-5416(79)90005-3 ↗
14. Bentahar M, El Guerjouma R. Monitoring progressive damage in polymer-based composite using nonlinear dynamics and acoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;125:EL39-44.10.1121/1.2993755 ↗
15. Carpenter S, Gorman M. A comparison of AE measurements from aluminum alloys and glass/epoxy composites with different AE techniques. In: Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Springer; 1998. p. 509–16.10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_66 ↗
16. Investigation of the Z-binder role in progressive damage of 3D woven composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.11.022 ↗
17. Acoustic emission during the plastic deformation of aluminium alloys 2024 and 212410.1016/0025-5416(83)90023-X ↗
18. Acoustic emission and inclusion fracture in 7075 aluminum alloys10.1007/BF00614995 ↗
19. Origin of burst-type acoustic emission in unflawed 7075–T6 aluminum10.1520/JTE10518J ↗
20. AE source location and orientation determination of tensile cracks from surface observation
21. Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack propagation10.1016/S0143-974X(02)00064-0 ↗
22. Acoustic emission during fatigue crack propagation in the aluminium alloys 2024 and 212410.1016/0025-5416(83)90102-7 ↗
23. Identification of crack initiation in aluminum alloys using acoustic emission10.1007/s11340-015-9984-5 ↗
24. Vanniamparambil PA, Bartoli I, Hazeli K, Cuadra J, Schwartz E, et al. An integrated structural health monitoring approach for crack growth monitoring. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2012;23:1563–73.10.1177/1045389X12447987 ↗
25. Vanniamparambil PA, Cuadra J, Guclu U, Bartoli I, Kontsos A. Cross-validated detection of crack initiation in aerospace materials. In: SPIE smart structures and materials+ nondestructive evaluation and health monitoring. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2014. p. 906429–906429-906411.10.1117/12.2045207 ↗
26. Frederick J, Felbeck D. Dislocation motion as a source of acoustic emission. In: Acoustic emission. ASTM International; 1972.10.1520/STP35385S ↗
27. Acoustic emission from plastic deformation of a pure single crystal10.1063/1.351652 ↗
28. Energy dissipation via acoustic emission in ductile crack initiation
29. Acoustic emission source modeling using a data-driven approach10.1016/j.jsv.2014.12.021 ↗
30. Damage quantification in polymer composites using a hybrid NDT approach10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.04.013 ↗
31. Microstructure-sensitive investigation of magnesium alloy fatigue10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.10.010 ↗
32. In situ identification of twin-related bands near yielding in a magnesium alloy10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.009 ↗
33. Identification of crack initiation in aluminum alloys using acoustic emission10.1007/s11340-015-9984-5 ↗
34. Wisner B, Kontsos A. Fatigue damage precursor identification using nondestructive evaluation coupled with electron microscopy. In: Fracture, fatigue, failure and damage evolution, vol. 8. Springer; 2017. p. 1–8.10.1007/978-3-319-42195-7_1 ↗
35. Acoustic emission of deformation twinning in magnesium10.3390/ma9080662 ↗
36. Three-dimensional effects of twinning in magnesium alloys10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.12.001 ↗
37. In situ identification of twin-related bands near yielding in a magnesium alloy10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.009 ↗
38. Vanniamparambil PA, Cuadra J, Guclu U, Bartoli I, Kontsos A. Cross-validated detection of crack initiation in aerospace materials; 2014. p. 906411–29.10.1117/12.2045207 ↗
39. Ultra high speed DIC and virtual fields method analysis of a three point bending impact test on an aluminium bar10.1007/s11340-010-9402-y ↗
40. Surface observation and measurement techniques to study the fatigue damage micromechanisms in a duplex stainless steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.003 ↗
41. High resolution digital image correlation measurements of strain accumulation in fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.06.010 ↗
42. Microstamping for improved speckle patterns to enable digital image correlation10.1017/S1431927615003050 ↗
43. Small-scale patterning methods for digital image correlation under scanning electron microscopy10.1088/0957-0233/22/12/125501 ↗
44. Self-assembled nanoparticle surface patterning for improved digital image correlation in a scanning electron microscope10.1007/s11340-013-9734-5 ↗
45. Plastic strain mapping with sub-micron resolution using digital image correlation10.1007/s11340-012-9685-2 ↗
46. Mechanisms of serrated flow in aluminium alloys with precipitates investigated by acoustic emission10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00070-6 ↗
47. In situ 3-D observation of early strain localization during failure of thin Al alloy (2198) sheet10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.033 ↗
48. Microscale characterization of granular deformation near a crack tip10.1007/s10853-011-5608-3 ↗
49. Grosskreuts J. Critical mechanisms in the development of fatigue cracks in 2024–T4 aluminum. In: ICF2, Brighton (UK) 1969; 2013.
50. In-situ scanning electron microscopy studies of small fatigue crack growth in ultrasonic consolidation bonded aluminum 2024 laminated structure10.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.093 ↗
51. Fatigue crack initiation and microcrack growth in 2024-T4 and 2124-T4 aluminum alloys10.1007/BF02658324 ↗
52. May A, Belouchrani MA, Manaa A, Bouteghrine Y. Influence of fatigue damage on the mechanical behaviour of 2024-T3 aluminum alloy. Proc Eng 2011;10:798–806.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.132 ↗
53. Microstructure-based fatigue modeling of cast A356–T6 alloy10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00021-8 ↗
54. A study of nucleation and fatigue behavior of an aerospace aluminum alloy 2024–T310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.010 ↗
55. Three-dimensional fatigue crack growth behavior in an aluminum alloy investigated with in situ high-resolution synchrotron X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.036 ↗
56. Direct high resolution in situ SEM observations of small fatigue crack opening profiles in the ultra-fine grain aluminium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2007.08.006 ↗
57. Effects of constituent particle clusters on fatigue behavior of 2024–T3 aluminum alloy10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00041-3 ↗
58. Metallurgical factors affecting fracture toughness of aluminum alloys10.1007/BF02672285 ↗
59. Local dissolution phenomena associated with S phase (Al2CuMg) particles in aluminum alloy 2024-T310.1149/1.1837874 ↗
60. Characterization of 2024-T3: an aerospace aluminum alloy10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.09.050 ↗
61. Structural, elastic and electronic properties of θ (Al 2 Cu) and S (Al 2 CuMg) strengthening precipitates in Al–Cu–Mg series alloys: first-principles calculations10.1016/j.ssc.2012.09.003 ↗
62. Quantitative characterization of three-dimensional damage evolution in a wrought Al-alloy under tension and compression10.1007/s11661-002-0381-1 ↗
63. Alsabti K, Ranka S, Singh V. An efficient k-means clustering algorithm; 1997.
64. The global k-means clustering algorithm10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2 ↗
65. Ductile fracture: nucleation at inclusions10.1016/0036-9748(76)90150-2 ↗