Multiaxial cyclic behaviour of extruded and forged AZ80 Mg alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The quasi-static and cyclic response of as-extruded and closed-die extruded-forged AZ80 Mg alloy forged at 250 °C and 20 mm/sec was investigated. Servo hydraulic, fully reversed, strain controlled uniaxial “push-pull”, pure torsion, and biaxial fatigue testing were also conducted on the closed-die forged alloy. Two uniaxial loading paths (pure axial and pure shear) and three different biaxial loading paths were investigated (proportional loading, and non-proportional loading at phase angles of 45° and 90°). After forging of the as-extruded billet, the yield stress in the axial direction increased by 46%, the failure elongation by 35% and the ultimate strength by 13%. The spatial variation in both the local texture, microstructure and superficial hardness throughout the cross section of the forging was investigated and discussed. The web region in the center of the forged billet exhibited a virtually fully recrystallized and refined microstructure with intense basal texture, whereas the rib regions on each side exhibited a partially recrystallized and coarser microstructure with less intense texture. The fatigue life of the forged material in the axial direction showed dramatic improvement relative to the as-extruded material at strain amplitudes which were less than 0.35%. However, at higher strain amplitudes, there are significantly higher cyclic stresses (and associated fatigue damage) in the forged material (relative to the as-extruded), resulting in a decrease in life under fully reversed strain controlled fatigue loading. For the pure axial strain path, the total amount of strain energy density (SED) observed in the stabilized response was a function of number of cycles only, and was insensitive to material condition (as-extruded or forged). However, for the forged material, of all the strain paths investigated, only the pure shear path demonstrated a significantly different relationship of total SED vs. life. Furthermore, the amount of total SED for a given number of cycles decreases when biaxial loading is introduced, though following the same general relationship as the pure axial strain path. The effect of a decrease in total SED for a given number of cycles occurred in all biaxial strain paths, with proportional being the least prominent, then 45° and 90° out of phase being progressively more pronounced respectively. Both the Smith Watson Topper (SWT) and Jahed-Varvani (JV) models were utilized to predict the fatigue life of the uniaxial and biaxial cyclic tests. Calibration of each models intrinsic parameters were done using both of the uniaxial loading paths individually, then these same parameters were used in combination with one another to predict the life in the biaxial cases. Both the SWT and JV models are capable of giving an acceptable prediction, however the JV model’s prediction is more reliable, especially when the cyclic response has pronounced asymmetry. The biaxial fatigue response is somewhat dominated by the axial component for two significant reasons; firstly, the shape of the hysteresis in the shear direction dramatically changes based on phase angle and axial strain amplitude, whereas the axial hysteresis loop remains somewhat invariant to the presence or modulation of the other loading axis. Secondly, the initial crack propagation mode is predominantly transverse to the axial direction in all strain paths except for pure shear (which exhibits longitudinal cracking). Tensile cracking dominating the biaxial failure mode provides qualitative justification of a modification factor to an existing energy based biaxial fatigue life prediction model, enabling it to predict the life of extruded and forged AZ80 Mg reliably for a variety of different biaxial strain paths.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Sound package design for lightweight vehicles
2. Al-Samman T. Magnesium: the role of crystallographic texture, deformation conditions and alloying elements on formability; 2008. p. 233.
3. Kurz · Die forging of magnesium materials · 2008 · 724 · 2018
4. Effect of hot-deformation on microstructure and mechanical properties of AZ80 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2013.06.018 ↗
5. Forgeability of Mg-Al-Zn magnesium alloys in hot and warm closed die forging10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.04.091 ↗
6. Micro and macro texture evolution during multiaxial forging of a WE43 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.181 ↗
7. Physical metallurgy of Mg AZ80 alloys for forging applications
8. Wang Q, Zhang ZM, Zhang X, Yu JM. Precision forging technologies for magnesium alloy bracket and wheel. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China English ed., vol. 18, no. SPEC. ISSUE 1; 2008, pp. s205–s208.10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60203-8 ↗
9. Simulation and experimental research on isothermal forging with semi-closed die and multi-stage-change speed of large AZ80 magnesium alloy support beam10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.03.015 ↗
10. Magforge – Mechanical behaviour of forged AZ31B extruded magnesium in monotonic compression10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.828-829.291 ↗
11. Tensile and fatigue behaviour of as-forged AZ31B extrusion10.3221/IGF-ESIS.38.34 ↗
12. Compression behaviour of semi-closed die forged AZ80 extrusion
13. Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of cast and cast-forged AZ80 Mg10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.038 ↗
14. Low-cycle fatigue characterization and texture induced ratcheting behaviour of forged AZ80 Mg alloys10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.06.028 ↗
15. Microstructure, texture and mechanical behavior characterization of hot forged cast ZK60 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.jmst.2017.04.004 ↗
16. Karparvarfard SMH, Shaha SK, Behravesh SB, Jahed H, Williams B. Fatigue life improvement of cast ZK60 Mg alloy through low temperature closed-die forging for automotive applications 2018;06009:1–6.10.1051/matecconf/201816506009 ↗
17. Fatigue characteristics and modeling of cast and cast-forged ZK60 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.019 ↗
18. Effect of forging on the low cycle fatigue behavior of cast AZ31B alloy10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.086 ↗
19. Effect of forging on microstructure, texture, and uniaxial properties of cast AZ31B alloy10.1007/s11665-017-2743-2 ↗
20. Very high cycle fatigue behaviour of as-extruded AZ31, AZ80, and ZK60 magnesium alloys10.3139/146.110043 ↗
21. Uniaxial cyclic deformation and fatigue behavior of AM50 magnesium alloy sheet metals under symmetric and asymmetric loadings10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.056 ↗
22. Role of loading direction on cyclic behaviour characteristics of AM30 extrusion and its fatigue damage modelling10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.116 ↗
23. Evaluation of low cycle fatigue life in AZ31 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.003 ↗
24. Tensile and fatigue behaviour of wrought magnesium alloys AZ31 and AZ6110.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01267.x ↗
25. Cyclic deformation and fatigue of rolled AZ80 magnesium alloy along different material orientations10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.031 ↗
26. An experimental study on cyclic deformation and fatigue of extruded ZK60 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.016 ↗
27. An experimental study of cyclic plastic deformation of extruded ZK60 magnesium alloy under uniaxial loading at room temperature10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.07.008 ↗
28. Fatigue of ZK60 magnesium alloy under uniaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.02.019 ↗
29. Experimental investigation on temperature-dependent uniaxial ratchetting of AZ31B magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.10.020 ↗
30. Multiaxial fatigue damage models
31. Multiaxial fatigue: an overview and some approximation models for life estimation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
32. Multiaxial effects on LCF behaviour and fatigue failure of AZ31B magnesium extrusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.025 ↗
33. Anisotropy in the quasi-static and cyclic behavior of ZK60 extrusion: characterization and fatigue modeling10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.026 ↗
34. Biaxial low cycle fatigue under non-proportional loading of a magnesium-lithium alloy10.1016/0013-7944(95)00223-5 ↗
35. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.039 ↗
36. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ61A magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.020 ↗
37. Multiaxial cyclic behaviour and fatigue modelling of AM30 Mg alloy extrusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.037 ↗
38. Multiaxial fatigue modeling for Nitinol shape memory alloys under in-phase loading
39. Multiaxial behaviour of wrought magnesium alloys – a review and suitability of energy-based fatigue life model10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.08.004 ↗
40. Cyclic axial and cyclic torsional behaviour of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.04.012 ↗
41. Aging behavior of ECAP processed AZ80 Mg alloy
42. Cyclic deformation and fatigue of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy under different strain ratios10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.084 ↗
43. A stress-strain function for the fatigue of metals
44. Low-cycle fatigue characteristics of rolled Mg-3Al-1Zn alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.002 ↗
45. Effect of anisotropy on the low-cycle fatigue behavior of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.044 ↗
46. Albinmousa J, Jahed H, Lambert S. An energy-based fatigue model for wrought magnesium alloy under multiaxial load. Ninth Int Conf Multiaxial Fatigue Fract; 2010. p. 471–8.
47. Upper and lower fatigue life limits model using energy-based fatigue properties10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.039 ↗
48. A total strain energy density theory for cumulative fatigue damage10.1115/1.3265565 ↗
49. An energy-based fatigue life assessment model for various metallic materials under proportional and non-proportional loading conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.017 ↗
50. Load path sensitivity and fatigue life estimation of 30CrNiMo8HH10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.009 ↗
51. Fatigue life and early cracking predictions of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy using critical plane approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.002 ↗