A deviatoric version of the SWT parameter
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The Smith–Watson–Topper parameter (SWT = σ max e a ) was originally suggested and is still widely used to account for the mean stress effects in fatigue life analysis. It is well recognized however, that the SWT parameter might be a non-conservative description for cyclic loads that involve relatively large compressive mean stresses that can develop in samples/components with notches after overloads. In such situations σ max tends to be small resulting in underestimating the SWT parameter. It is shown that the SWT parameter can be interpreted in terms of the sum of strain energy and complementary strain energy densities supplemented by the strain energy density associated with a mean stress in the cycle. Using this energy interpretation and its analogy with the Neuber’s rule a deviatoric version of the SWT parameter called SWT D is proposed. It is found that for positive mean stresses and moderate negative mean stresses the original SWT parameter and the proposed deviatoric SWT D parameter yield similar results. At large compressive mean stresses, the deviatoric SWT D parameter demonstrates a fairly good correlation while the original SWT parameter is unable to correlate the data. Although the proposed approach seems to be very promising, based on the limited data of this study, it should be further re-examined using more experimental data sets, in particular for multiaxial in-phase and out-of-phase loadings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Dowling · 2013
2. Stephens · 2001
3. The exponential law of endurance tests
4. Morrow JD. Fatigue properties of metals. In: Fatigue design handbook Sec. 3.2. SAE advances in engineering, Warrendale, PA; 1968. p. 21–9.
5. Investigation of the allowable stress in iron construction
6. Goodman · 1899
7. Factor of safety and working stress
8. Walker K. The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum. In: Effects of environment and complex load history on fatigue life, ASTM STP 462, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA; 1970. p. 1–14.10.1520/STP32032S ↗
9. A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal
10. Manson SS. Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress. In: Heat transfer symposium, University of Michigan Engineering Research Institute; 1953. p. 9–55.
11. Practical implementation of the double linear damage rule and damage curve approach for treating cumulative fatigue damage10.1007/BF00053519 ↗
12. A stress–strain functions for the fatigue of metals
13. Fatigue of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.07.005 ↗
14. A new approach to predicting fatigue life behavior under action of mean stresses10.1016/0025-5416(84)90223-4 ↗
15. Dowling NE. Mean stress effects in stress-life and strain-life fatigue. In: 2nd SAE Brazil international conference on fatigue, Sao Paulo, Brasil, SAE Paper No. 2004-01-2227, SAE; 2004.10.4271/2004-01-2227 ↗
16. An energy-based damage parameter for the life prediction of AISI 304 stainless steel subjected to mean strain10.1080/02533839.2006.9671145 ↗
17. A modification of Morrow and Smith–Watson–Topper mean stress correction models10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x ↗
18. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
19. Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.11.002 ↗
20. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion for hard materials10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00075-X ↗
21. Structural integrity assessment of metallic components under multiaxial fatigue: the C–S criterion and its evolution10.1111/ffe.12037 ↗
22. Estimation of stress intensity factor for a short crack in elactic–plastic notch10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.07.005 ↗
23. A two-parameter analysis of S–N fatigue life using Δσ and σmax10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.007 ↗
24. Elasto-plastic stress and strain behavior at notch roots under monotonic and cyclic loadings
25. Notch effect on multiaxial low cycle fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.011 ↗
26. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of severely notched carbon steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.010 ↗
27. A method of elastic–plastic stress and strain calculation at a notch root10.1016/0025-5416(81)90089-6 ↗
28. Calculation of elasto-plastic strains and stresses in notches under multiaxial loading10.1007/BF00032453 ↗
29. Kujawski D. Deviatoric formulation of the SWT parameter. In: Proc of 10th inter conf on muliaxial fatigue and fracture, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan, July 2013.
30. Mean stress effects on low cycle fatigue for a high strength steel10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00672.x ↗