journal article·2017-08

A quantitative weld sizing criterion for fatigue design of load-carrying fillet-welded connections

Shizhu Xing, Pingsha Dong, Ping Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fillet welded connections are most commonly used for construction of engineering structures that are often subjected to various forms of cyclic loading in service. There exist two potential fatigue failure modes, i.e., weld root cracking through weld throat and weld toe cracking into plate thickness. The former should be prevented at design stage through a proper weld sizing. However, due to difficulties in determining stress concentration at weld throat, existing fatigue design rules, particularly on weld sizing, are largely empirical and often result in excessive conservatisms, leading to oversized welds. As structural light weighting becomes increasingly important, there is an increasing demand for more quantitative fatigue-based fillet weld sizing criterion. By taking advantage of a comprehensive set of fatigue test results on load-carrying fillet-welded cruciform joints and associated analytical developments reported by Xing et al. (2016), an analytical weld throat stress model taking into account of weld penetration and joint misalignments is presented in this paper for determining critical weld size beyond which weld throat failure become unlikely. Then, it is shown that a weld sizing criterion can be analytically developed and expressed as a function of weld penetration and joint misalignments, which are shown to agree well with the large amount of test data reported by Xing et al. (2016), including a systematic validation by means of a logistic regression method on the same test data. As a result, the present developments provide both analytical and experimental basis for achieving quantitative weld sizing so that weld throat fatigue failure mode can be effectively prevented with a clearly defined confidence level without the need of over-sizing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Status review on fatigue performance of fillet welds10.1115/1.2827941 ↗
2. Gurney TR. Fatigue of welded structures. CUP Archive; 1979.
3. Noblett · 2000 · 120
4. A fatigue strength evaluation method for load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.10.004 ↗
5. A study on fatigue crack initiation point of load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.003 ↗
6. Hobbacher · 1996
7. IIW recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components WRC
8. Code of practice for fatigue design and assessment of steel structures. BS7608, British Standards Institution; 1993.
9. Design of steel structures—Part 1–1. ENV 1993-1-1. Eurocode 3, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels; 1992.
10. Fatigue of tubular joints: hot spot stress method revisited10.1115/1.4005188 ↗
11. A structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analysis of welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00055-X ↗
12. Notch stress intensity factors and fatigue strength of aluminium and steel welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00086-4 ↗
13. Notch stress concepts for the fatigue assessment of welded joints–background and applications10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.011 ↗
14. MIL-STD-1628. 1974 department of defense test method: fillet weld size, strength, and efficiency determination, June 28.
15. AWS FWSH design handbook for calculating fillet weld sizes; 1997.
16. Reduced fillet weld sizes for naval ships
17. A traction stress based shear strength definition for fillet welds10.1177/0309324712456646 ↗
18. Strength analysis of fillet welds under longitudinal and transverse shear conditions10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.06.003 ↗
19. Reduction of overwelding and distortion for naval surface combatants, Part 1: optimized weld sizing for lightweight ship structures10.5957/JSPD.30.4.130028 ↗
20. A math-based design-for-produceability evaluation of titanium applications in ship hull structures
21. DNV, Det Norske Veritas. Recommended practice DNV-RP-C203 fatigue design of offshore steel structures; 2005.
22. Analysis of fatigue failure mode transition in load-carrying fillet-welded connections10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.01.001 ↗
23. Fatigue analysis of manufacturing defects in weldments10.1016/0142-1123(86)90053-8 ↗
24. Length scale of secondary stresses in fracture and fatigue10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.10.005 ↗
25. An analytical SCF solution method for joint misalignments and application in fatigue test data interpretation10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.07.006 ↗
26. The master S-N curve method: an implementation for fatigue evaluation of welded components in the ASME B&PV code, section VIII, Division 2 and API 579–1/ASME FFS-1
27. Analysis of recent fatigue data using the structural stress procedure in ASME Div2 rewrite10.1115/1.2748818 ↗
28. A robust structural stress parameter for evaluation of multiaxial fatigue of weldments10.1520/JAI100348 ↗
29. A generalized cycle counting criterion for arbitrary multi-axial fatigue loading conditions10.1177/0309324713515465 ↗
30. A new path-dependent fatigue damage model for non-proportional multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.010 ↗
31. An equivalent stress parameter for multi-axial fatigue evaluation of welded components including non-proportional loading effects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.006 ↗
32. Understanding data in clinical research: a simple graphical display for plotting data (up to four independent variables) after binary logistic regression analysis10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00335-9 ↗
33. Hosmer · 2004