Fatigue of wire+arc additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V in presence of process-induced porosity defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Currently, additive manufactured titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V predominantly fails from process-induced defects, when subjected to cyclic loading in the polished condition. These defects not only lead to premature failure, but also contribute to the significant dispersion of fatigue life commonly seen in metal additive manufacturing. In this work, we have studied the source of dispersion and the influence of pore size on fatigue life using samples from the standard processing route and samples with intentionally introduced porosity defects. According to the fracture surface study, contrary to the common belief, the source of dispersion is primarily the pore location, e.g. surface or embedded pore, rather than the pore size. In the case of embedded pores as the failure source, a threshold pore size of approximately 85 μm was observed, below which the wrought level fatigue performance was achieved. For surface pores above the threshold size, fatigue life was reduced by two orders of magnitude, but remained unchanged, even though crack initiating pore size increased roughly by a factor of four. This experimental observation was supported by local elastic stress analysis, which indicated that pores above a certain size could behave like micro-notches suggesting the popular Kitagawa-Takahashi diagrams should be presented with a horizontal asymptote for this alloy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Defect distribution and microstructure heterogeneity effects on fracture resistance and fatigue behavior of EBM Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.001 ↗
2. Effects of Defects in Laser Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on Fatigue Properties10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.120 ↗
3. Fatigue performance of additive manufactured TiAl6V4 using electron and laser beam melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.001 ↗
4. Comparison of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V fabricated by selective laser melting and electron beam melting10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.135 ↗
5. Comparative study of fatigue properties of Ti-6Al-4V specimens built by electron beam melting (EBM) and selective laser melting (SLM)10.1016/j.matchar.2018.03.028 ↗
6. Fatigue properties of a titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) fabricated via electron beam melting (EBM): Effects of internal defects and residual stress10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.022 ↗
7. Analyzing the effects of powder and post-processing on porosity and properties of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V10.1080/21663831.2017.1340911 ↗
8. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Wire and Arc Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1007/s11661-012-1444-6 ↗
9. Additive manufacturing of metallic components – Process, structure and properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
10. Observation of keyhole-mode laser melting in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.005 ↗
11. Real-time monitoring of laser powder bed fusion process using high-speed X-ray imaging and diffraction
12. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
13. Criticality of porosity defects on the fatigue performance of wire + arc additive manufactured titanium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.017 ↗
14. A new approach to correlate the defect population with the fatigue life of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105584 ↗
15. Fatigue Strength Prediction for Titanium Alloy TiAl6V4 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting10.1007/s11661-015-2864-x ↗
16. Low- and high-cycle fatigue resistance of Ti-6Al-4V ELI additively manufactured via selective laser melting: Mean stress and defect sensitivity10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.10.021 ↗
17. Material defects as the basis of fatigue design10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.001 ↗
18. Murakami Y. 13 - Ti alloys. In: Murakami Y, editor. Met. Fatigue Second Ed. 2nd ed., Academic Press 2019, p. 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813876-2.00013-3.10.1016/B978-0-12-813876-2.00013-3 ↗
19. The Influence of Porosity on Fatigue Crack Initiation in Additively Manufactured Titanium Components10.1038/s41598-017-06504-5 ↗
20. Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9 ↗
21. Additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V replacement parts for military aircraft10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.041 ↗
22. Do additive manufactured parts deserve better?10.1111/ffe.13092 ↗
23. Assessment of the effect of isolated porosity defects on the fatigue performance of additive manufactured titanium alloy
24. A unified approach to model the effect of porosity and high surface roughness on the fatigue properties of additively manufactured Ti6-Al4-V alloys
25. Measurement and modelling of residual stress in wire-feed additively manufactured titanium10.1080/02670836.2018.1528747 ↗
26. E08 Committee. E466: Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials. ASTM International n.d. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0466-15.10.1520/E0466-15 ↗
27. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2019 ASME boiler and pressure vessel code: an international code [Section VIII]. New York: Am Soc Mech Eng 2019.
28. Rennert R, Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau, editors. Analytical strength assessment of components: made of steel, cast iron and aluminum materials in mechanical engineering FKM Guideline. 6th, rev. ed ed. Frankfurt Am Main: VDMA-Verl 2013.
29. Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
30. Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.026 ↗
31. Fatigue crack propagation properties of Ti–6Al–4V in vacuum environments10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.012 ↗
32. Non-destructive observation of internal fatigue crack growth in Ti–6Al–4V by using synchrotron radiation μCT imaging10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.028 ↗
33. Fabrication of artificial defects to study internal fatigue crack propagation in metals10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.05.018 ↗
34. Effects of vacuum environment on small fatigue crack propagation in Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.024 ↗
35. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12107: Metallic materials — Fatigue testing — Statistical planning and analysis of data. ISO 2003.
36. Defects as a root cause of fatigue failure of metallic components
37. Probabilistic approaches to fatigue with special emphasis on initiation from inclusions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.09.002 ↗
38. Influence of defect morphology and position on the fatigue limit of cast Al alloy: 3D characterization by X-ray microtomography of natural and artificial defects10.1016/j.msea.2020.139347 ↗
39. Suresh S. Fatigue of Materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806575.10.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
40. Fatigue behaviour of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy: The role of defects on scatter and statistical size effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105811 ↗
41. Hobbacher A, International Institute of Welding, editors. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components: IIW document IIW-2249-15, ex XIII-2460-13/XV-1440-13. 2nd ed. Cham Heidelberg New York: Springer 2016.
42. Critical assessment of the fatigue performance of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V and perspective for future research10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.003 ↗
43. A Review of the Fatigue Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1007/s11837-017-2728-5 ↗
44. 1994
45. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
46. Lütjering · 2007
47. Taylor · 2007
48. Improvement of fatigue resistance and ductility of TiAl6V4 processed by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.025 ↗
49. Timošenko · 2004
50. Geometrical effects in fatigue: a unifying theoretical model10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00007-9 ↗
51. Tammas-Williams S. XCT analysis of the defect distribution and its effect on the static and dynamic mechanical properties in Ti-6Al-4V components manufactured by electron beam additive manufacture. University of Manchester 2016.
52. Effect of small defects on the fatigue strength of martensitic stainless steels10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.06.021 ↗
53. British Standards Institution. BS 7910: Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. London: BSI 2007.
54. Pilkey · 2008
55. Mura · 1987
56. Schijve J, editor. Fatigue of Structures and Materials. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9.10.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9 ↗
57. Schneider CRA, Maddox SJ. Best practice guide on statistical analysis of fatigue data. International Institute of Welding, IIW-XIII-WG1-114-03 2003.
58. On the use of critical distance theories for the prediction of the high cycle fatigue limit stress in notched Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.002 ↗