journal article·2022-07Open access

Fatigue life uncertainty prediction using the Monte Carlo and Latin hypercube sampling techniques under uniaxial and multiaxial cyclic loading

Aleksander Karolczuk, Marta Kurek

Abstract

The estimation of uncertainty in fatigue life prediction is a decision-making factor in structural design. The problem is specific in the case of multiaxial loading owing to the complex process involved in life prediction. Numerical algorithms are often required to narrow our choice of uncertainty estimation to stochastic sampling. The Monte Carlo technique is often substituted by Latin hypercubes to reduce the computational cost. However, its effectiveness in the uncertainty of life prediction under multiaxial loading has not been validated. To bridge this gap, these two sampling techniques are tested and compared with the application of several stress-based models to the new results of the experimental test on 16Mo3 steel.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Statistical distribution functions and fatigue of structures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.03.001 ↗
2. New method for the statistical evaluation of constant stress amplitude fatigue-test results
3. Review of the margins for ASME code fatigue design curve – effects of surface roughness and material variability
4. Probabilistic S-N fields based on statistical distributions applied to metallic and composite materials: state of the art10.1177/1687814019870395 ↗
5. EN 1993-1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-9: Fatigue. Brussels: 2005.
6. Hobbacher A. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. 2nd ed. Springer, International Institute of Welding; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2.10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2_8 ↗
7. A comparison of different design codes on fatigue life assessment methods
8. Determination of the fatigue P-S-N curves – a critical review and improved backward statistical inference method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105789 ↗
9. Generalized probabilistic model allowing for various fatigue damage variables10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.031 ↗
10. The Monte Carlo method10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
11. Monte Carlo techniques in computational stochastic mechanics10.1007/BF02736747 ↗
12. Why the Monte Carlo method is so important today10.1002/wics.1314 ↗
13. The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002 ↗
14. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code
15. On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5 ↗
16. Methods for structural reliability computations
17. Statistical strain-life fatigue analysis
18. Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine discs under multi-source uncertainties10.1111/ffe.12772 ↗
19. Computational-experimental approaches for fatigue reliability assessment of turbine bladed disks10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.050 ↗
20. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
21. A log-normal format for failure probability under LCF: Concept, validation and definition of design curve10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.027 ↗
22. Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in fatigue reliability analysis of turbine bladed disks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105912 ↗
23. Scatter in fatigue life due to effects of porosity in cast A356-T6 aluminum-silicon alloys10.1007/s11661-003-0153-6 ↗
24. Probabilistic modeling of the size effect and scatter in High Cycle Fatigue using a Monte-Carlo approach: role of the defect population in cast aluminum alloys10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106177 ↗
25. Sampling method in probabilistic S-version finite element analysis for initial flaw size10.1007/s40430-016-0549-z ↗
26. Probabilistic strain-fatigue life performance based on stochastic analysis of structural and WAAM-stainless steels10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105495 ↗
27. Fatigue failure probability estimation of the 7075–T651 aluminum alloy under multiaxial loading based on the life-dependent material parameters concept10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106174 ↗
28. Application of the Gaussian process for fatigue life prediction under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108599 ↗
29. Walpole · 2016
30. Application of life-dependent material parameters to fatigue life prediction under multiaxial and non-zero mean loading10.3390/ma13071587 ↗
31. A correction in the algorithm of fatigue life calculation based on the critical plane approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.011 ↗
32. Analysis of revised fatigue life calculation algorithm under proportional and non-proportional loading with constant amplitude10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.027 ↗
33. Application of life-dependent material parameters to lifetime calculation under multiaxial constant- and variable-amplitude loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105625 ↗
34. Evaluation of the Fatemi-Socie damage parameter for the fatigue life calculation with application of the Chaboche plasticity model10.1111/ffe.12895 ↗
35. The performance of selected multiaxial criteria under tension/torsion loading conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105532 ↗
36. A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials10.1007/s10704-005-1088-2 ↗
37. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion for hard metals10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00075-X ↗
38. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel
39. Criterion for high cycle fatigue failure under multiaxial loading
40. A failure criterion for multiaxial fatigue stresses
41. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending10.1115/1.4008327 ↗
42. An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress10.1299/jsme1958.20.257 ↗
43. Two new multiaxial criteria for high cycle fatigue computation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.015 ↗
44. Essential structure of S-N curve: prediction of fatigue life and fatigue limit of defective materials and nature of scatter10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106138 ↗
45. ASTM E739-10. Standard Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life (S-N) and Strain-Life Fatigue Data. ASTM Int West Conshohocken, PA, 2015;03.01.
46. Matlab R2021b. Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox 2021.
47. Evaluation of different techniques in estimating orientation of crack initiation planes and fatigue lifetime under complex multiaxial loading paths10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.026 ↗
48. Minimum circumscribed ellipse (MCE) and stress scale factor (SSF) criteria for multiaxial fatigue life assessment10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.08.008 ↗
49. Critical plane–based multiaxial fatigue life prediction of turbine disk alloys by refining normal stress sensitivity10.1177/0309324718779922 ↗
50. Integral fatigue criteria evaluation for life estimation under uniaxial combined proportional and non-proportional loadings
51. Multiaxial vibration fatigue - A theoretical and experimental comparison10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.02.012 ↗
52. Progress in fatigue life calculation by implementing life-dependent material parameters in multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105509 ↗