A new FE post-processor for probabilistic fatigue assessment in the presence of defects and its application to AM parts
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Despite the disruptive benefits of Additive Manufacturing (AM), the application of this technology for safety-critical structural parts in aerospace is still far from being achieved and standardised. The necessity to comply with very strict reliability requirements is hindering this final step because of the large scatter and low reproducibility always associated with AM, especially in terms of fatigue strength. In this regard, manufacturing defects are the most important and complex issue, but several other sources of variability have an effect as well. The AM community and the main aerospace industries involved are starting to agree that damage-tolerant approaches are necessary and that probabilistic methods are best-suited to obtain reliable but not over-constrained assessments. To address this issue, the authors have developed ProFACE, a fully-probabilistic software that aims to robustly assess the fatigue strength and critical locations of complex components in the presence of defects. This paper presents the underlying concept, its implementation and early validation, and a simple application to a space component. The analytical formulation makes this tool ideal to evaluate very low failure probabilities with limited time and effort, which can provide valuable information to significantly improve part design and qualification.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Towards rapid qualification of powder-bed laser additively manufactured parts10.1186/s40192-016-0052-5 ↗
2. Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing10.1007/s11837-015-1810-0 ↗
3. Metal additive manufacturing: a review10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
4. Fatigue properties of AlSi10Mg obtained by additive manufacturing: Defect-based modelling and prediction of fatigue strength10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.002 ↗
5. U.S. Department of Transportation. FAA Advisory Circular 33.70-1. Guidance Material for Aircraft Engine Life-Limited Parts Requirements; 2009.
6. Chell GG, McClung RC, Russell DA, Chang KJ, Donnelly B. Significant a critical issues in proof testing: a critical appraisal. Tech. Rep., NASA; 1994.
7. Defect distribution and microstructure heterogeneity effects on fracture resistance and fatigue behavior of EBM Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.001 ↗
8. George C, Marshall Space Flight Center. Identification Msfc technical standard standard for additively manufactured spaceflight hardware by laser powder bed fusion 2017; 93. doi:MSFC-STD-3716.
9. Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and Certification10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
10. Effect of hardness and crack geometries on ΔKth of small cracks emanating from small defects
11. Effect of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9 ↗
12. Inclusion rating by statistics of extreme values and its application to fatigue strength prediction and quality control of materials10.6028/jres.099.032 ↗
13. Murakami · 2002
14. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
15. LCF behaviour and a comprehensive life prediction model for AlSi10Mg obtained by SLM10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.030 ↗
16. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured ti-6al-4v including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
17. Defect analysis and fatigue design basis for ni-based superalloy 718 manufactured by selective laser melting10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.002 ↗
18. Effects of defects, surface roughness and HIP on fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing,10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
19. Fatigue properties of alsi10mg produced by additive layer manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.029 ↗
20. Schijve · 2001
21. Application of a weakest-link concepts to the fatigue limit of the bearing steel SAE52100 in a bainitic condition10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00211.x ↗
22. On the contribution of notches to the failure probability of ceramic components10.1016/0955-2219(96)00011-8 ↗
23. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
24. Size effect in randomly loaded specimens10.1016/0142-1123(86)90026-5 ↗
25. Assessment of methods for prediction of notch and size effects at the fatigue limit based on test data by Böhm and Magin10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.011 ↗
26. Determination of local characteristics for the application of the Weakest-Link Model10.1002/mawe.200400872 ↗
27. A probabilistic model for LCF10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.015 ↗
28. Beretta S, Chai G, Soffiati E. A weakest-link analysis for fatigue strength of components containing defects. In: Carpinteri A, editor. Proceedings ICF11, Turin; 2005. p. 975.
29. Non-local stress approach for fatigue assessment based on weakest-link theory and statistics of extremes10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01190.x ↗
30. A post-processor for fatigue crack growth analysis based on a finite element stress field10.1016/j.cma.2007.09.012 ↗
31. Simulation of fatigue crack growth in components with random defects10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.006 ↗
32. SwRI. DARWIN. URL https://www.swri.org/darwin.
33. A new tool for design and certification of aircraft turbine rotors10.1115/1.1622409 ↗
34. A software framework for probabilistic fatigue life assessment of gas turbine engine rotor10.1520/JAI11563 ↗
35. Application of probabilistic fracture mechanics to prognosis of aircraft engine components10.2514/1.13142 ↗
36. Structural integrity assessment of turbine discs in presence of potential defects: Probabilistic analysis and implementation10.1111/ffe.12325 ↗
37. Gumbel · 1957
38. Statistical analysis of defects for fatigue strength prediction and quality control of materials10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x ↗
39. Small defects and inhomogeneities in fatigue strength: experiments, models and statistical implications10.1023/A:1009976418553 ↗
40. Extreme value models for the assessment of steels containing multiple types of inclusion10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.016 ↗
41. Beretta · 2010
42. Assessment of fatigue reliability of power transmission gearing for aerospace propulsion applications
43. Integration
44. Automated fatigue crack growth analysis of components10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.068 ↗
45. SIF and threshold for small cracks at small notches under torsion10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00260.x ↗
46. Qualification of AM parts: Extreme value statistics applied to tomographic measurements10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091 ↗
47. Tail behavior in wicksell’s corpuscle problem
48. The maximum size of the planar sections of random spheres and its application to metallurgy10.1007/BF00049294 ↗
49. Romano S. Probabilistic fatigue life assessment of Additive Manufacturing components through computational models. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy; 2018.
50. Timoshenko · 1970 · vol. 3
51. Montgomery · 2014
52. Duality of fatigue failures of materials caused by Poisson defect statistics of competing failure modes10.1038/nmat1351 ↗
53. Effect of build orientation on the fatigue properties of as-built Electron Beam Melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy
54. Le V-D, Pessard E, Morel F, Edy F. Influence of porosity on the fatigue behaviour of additively fabricated TA6V alloys. In: MATEC Web Conf., vol. 165; 2018. p. 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816502008.10.1051/matecconf/201816502008 ↗
55. A mechanistic approach to the Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram using a multiaxial probabilistic framework10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.06.001 ↗
56. About the fatigue crack propagation threshold of metals as a design criterion–a review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.12.002 ↗
57. Modelling of fatigue thresholds for small cracks in a mild steel by Strip-Yield model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.04.015 ↗
58. Robert · 2013
59. Influence of load spectrum assumptions on the expected reliability of hydroelectric turbines: A case study10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.008 ↗
60. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using an equivalent initial flaw size distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.005 ↗
61. Kuguel R. A relation between theoretical stress concentration factor and fatigue notch factor deduced from the concept of highly stressed volume. In: Proc ASTM, vol. 61; 1961. p. 732–48.
62. Übertragbarkeit von Werkstoffkennwerten am Beispiel eines betriebsfest auszulegenden geschmiedeten Nutzfahrzeug-Achsschenkels
63. Moriaux F. Additive manufacturing for space application. In: Altair technology conference, Paris; 2015 [accessed: 2018-04-15].
64. Romano S, Beretta S, Miccoli S, Gschweitl M. Probabilistic framework for defect tolerant fatigue assessment of AM parts applied to a space component. Accept. ASTM Sel. Tech. Pap.; 2019.10.1520/STP162020180112 ↗
65. ECSS-E-ST-32-01C Rev. 1. Space engineering - Fracture control; 2009.
66. NASA. Fracture Control Requirements For Spaceflight Hardware. NASA Technical standards system 2016;119.