journal article·2018-06Open access

Artificial neural network for random fatigue loading analysis including the effect of mean stress

J.F. Durodola, S. Ramachandra, S. Gerguri, N.A. Fellows

Abstract

Abstract The effect of mean stress is a significant factor in design for fatigue, especially under high cycle service conditions. The incorporation of mean stress effect in random loading fatigue problems using the frequency domain method is still a challenge. The problem is due to the fact that all cycle by cycle mean stress effects are aggregated during the Fourier transform process into a single zero frequency content. Artificial neural network (ANN) has great scope for non-linear generalization. This paper presents artificial neural network methods for including the effect of mean stress in the frequency domain approach for predicting fatigue damage. The materials considered in this work are metallic alloys. The results obtained present the ANN method as a viable approach to make fatigue damage predictions including the effect of mean stress. Greater resolution was obtained with the ANN method than with other available methods.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Dowling NE. Mechanical behavior of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue, Pearson; 2012.
2. Fatigue life prediction under wide band random loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00847.x ↗
3. Mean stress effects in fatigue of welded steel joints10.1016/S0266-8920(98)00019-8 ↗
4. Mean stress value in spectral method for the determination of fatigue life
5. Mean stress effect correction using constant stress ratio S-N curves10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.02.019 ↗
6. Neural networks in materials science10.2355/isijinternational.39.966 ↗
7. Determination of S-N curves with the application of artificial neural networks
8. A neural network approach to fatigue life prediction10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.003 ↗
9. Analysis of stress ratio effects on fatigue propagation in a sintered duplex steel by experimentation and artificial neural network approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.01.004 ↗
10. A study on the fatigue damage model for Gaussian wideband process of two peaks by an artificial neural network10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.11.008 ↗
11. Fatigue under wide band random stresses10.1061/JSDEAG.0005477 ↗
12. On the probability density function of rainflow stress range for stationary Gaussian processes10.1016/0142-1123(92)90088-T ↗
13. Spectral methods for lifetime prediction under wide-band stationary random processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.007 ↗
14. Dirlik T. Application of computers in fatigue analysis. University of Warwick; 1985.
15. High resolution non-destructive evaluation of defects using artificial neural networks and wavelets10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.08.011 ↗
16. Farley SJ, et al. A neural network approach for locating multiple defects. In: Vi JM, DulieuBarton JD, Lord, Greene RJ, Editors. Advances in experimental mechanics; 2008. p. 125–31.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.13-14.125 ↗
17. Hernandez-Gomez LH, et al. Locating defects using dynamic strain analysis and artificial neural networks. In: DulieuBarton JM, Quinn S, Editors. Advances in experimental mechanics IV; 2005. p. 325–30.10.4028/0-87849-987-3.325 ↗
18. A pattern recognition artificial neural network method for random fatigue loading life prediction10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.02.003 ↗
19. Newland · 1993
20. Bishop NW, Sherratt F. Finite element based fatigue calculations. NAFEMS; 2000.
21. Bendat JS, Piersol AG. Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, vol. 729. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.10.1002/9781118032428 ↗
22. Heaton J. Introduction to neural networks with Java. Heaton Research Inc.; 2008
23. www.statsoft.com. Neural Networks. July 2016 [cited 2016 July].
24. Igel C, Hüsken M. Improving the Rprop learning algorithm. In: Proceedings of the second international ICSC symposium on neural computation (NC 2000). Citeseer; 2000.
25. The MathWorks Inc (2010). MATLAB The language of technical computing. USA; 2010.
26. Cycle distribution and fatigue damage under broad-band random loading10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00032-4 ↗
27. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979 ↗
28. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
29. Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics10.1016/0045-7949(72)90043-0 ↗
30. Review and assessment of frequency-based fatigue damage models10.4271/2016-01-0369 ↗