Stress ratio effects on small fatigue crack growth in Ti–6Al–4V
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A systematic study of the effects of stress ratio on small fatigue crack growth in Ti–6Al–4V was conducted. Cylindrical fatigue specimens were tested axially at room temperature under a maximum stress of 690 MPa and with stress ratios (R) of 0.5, 0.1, and −1. Tests were periodically interrupted and a standard replication technique was used to monitor the growth of cracks artificially initiated from 30 to 40 μm micro-notches, which were milled into the specimen surface with a focused ion beam (FIB). Measurement of striation spacing from fracture surfaces was evaluated for determining small crack growth rates and showed good agreement with replication data, but is only possible for relatively high stress intensity factor ranges, ΔK, on the order of 10 MPa√m or greater. A significant small crack effect is observed in this alloy, consistent with previous observations, where small cracks grew at stress intensity factor ranges below the long crack threshold and at higher rates than long cracks for equivalent ΔK levels. While a modest effect of stress ratio is seen on small crack growth rates when plotted as a function of crack size (faster growth at lower mean stresses for a given maximum stress), no discernable effect of R is seen when plotting as a function of ΔK. Significant scatter is observed in the small crack growth rates, and the implications of data reduction methods are discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Littles JW, Jr., Buczek MB. Engine System Prognosis. In: Larsen JM, Christodoulou L, Calcaterra JR, Dent ML, Derriso MM, Hardman WJ, Jones JW, Russ SM, editors. Materials Damage Prognosis. TMS, Min Met Mater Soc; 2005. p. 23–9.
2. Christodoulou L, Larsen JM. Materials damage prognosis: a revolution in asset management. In: Larsen JM, Christodoulou L, Calcaterra JR, Dent ML, Derriso MM, Hardman WJ, Jones JW, Russ SM, editors. Materials Damage Prognosis. TMS, Min Met Mater Soc; 2005. p. 3–10.
3. Small Fatigue Cracks: Mechanics. Mechanisms and applications. In: Ravichandran KS, Ritchie RO, Murakami Y, editors. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.; 1999.
4. A new paradigm of fatigue variability behavior and implications for life prediction
5. Effect of load ratio and maximum stress intensity on the fatigue threshold in Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00099-0 ↗
6. Thresholds for high-cycle fatigue in a turbine engine Ti–6Al–4V alloy10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00024-9 ↗
7. An investigation of the effects of stress ratio and crack closure on the micromechanisms of fatigue crack growth in Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00380-1 ↗
8. Gallagher · 2004
9. Near threshold fatigue crack growth behavior of a titanium alloy: Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/0956-7151(91)90319-V ↗
10. Caton MJ. Predicting fatigue properties of cast aluminum by characterizing small-crack propagation behavior, PhD dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; 2001.
11. Newman JC, Jr., Edwards PR. Short crack growth behavior in an aluminum alloy – an AGARD cooperative test programme. AGARD Report #732, AGARD; 1988.
12. Role of foreign object damage on thresholds for high-cycle fatigue in Ti–6Al–4V10.1007/s11661-000-0167-2 ↗
13. Propagation of microcracks at stress amplitudes below the conventional fatigue limit in Ti–6Al–4V10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.t01-1-00217.x ↗
14. Microstructural influences on the growth of small cracks in Ti–6Al–4V10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00500.x ↗
15. Crack propagation life prediction for Ti–6Al–4V based on striation spacing measurements10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00019-0 ↗
16. McClung RC. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, Tabulated data generated from the Air Force-sponsored HCF initiative provided through personal July 2007.
17. Raju IS, Newman JC, Jr. Stress intensity factors for circumferential surface cracks in pipes and rods under tension and bending loads. Fracture mechanics, vol. 17. ASTM STP 905, ASTM; 1986. p. 789–05.10.1520/STP17428S ↗
18. Prediction of threshold stress intensity for fatigue crack growth using a dislocation model10.1007/BF00017294 ↗
19. Fatigue crack growth in ductile metals
20. Deformation mechanisms in alpha titanium
21. Rosi · Trans AIME · 1950 · 188 · 1159
22. A small-crack growth law and its related phenomena10.1016/0013-7944(92)90297-R ↗
23. The effect of solidification rate on the growth of small fatigue cracks in a cast 319-type aluminum alloy10.1007/s11661-999-0216-4 ↗
24. Larsen JM, Williams JC, Thompson AW. Crack-closure effects on the growth of small surface cracks in Titanium–Aluminum alloys. Mechanics of fatigue crack closure. ASTM STP 982, ASTM; 1988. p. 149–67.10.1520/STP27206S ↗
25. Larsen JM, Jira JR, Ravichandran KS. Measurement of small cracks by photomicroscopy: experiments and analysis. Small crack test methods. ASTM STP 1149, ASTM; 1992. p. 57–80.10.1520/STP15064S ↗
26. Jha SK, Caton MJ, Larsen JM. Mean vs. life-limiting fatigue behavior of a nickel-based superalloy. Superalloys 2008, TMS; 2008. p. 565–72.10.7449/2008/Superalloys_2008_565_572 ↗
27. Parallel array of semi-elliptical surface cracks in semi-infinite solid under tension10.1016/0013-7944(91)90189-8 ↗