A structural strain parameter for a unified treatment of fatigue behaviors of welded components
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper further investigates into the effectiveness of the structural strain method recently proposed by Dong et al. (2014) to model low-cycle fatigue behavior of welded structures. More precisely, an equivalent structural strain range parameter is introduced and implemented here in order to evaluate fatigue behaviors of welded components spanning both low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue regimes. A large number of well-documented fatigue data of weldments with various joint types, loading modes and base materials have been investigated in detail by using the structural strain approach. These components include gusset-to-plate, plate-to-plate and pipe-to-pipe joint. The fatigue loading varys from load-controlled to displacement-controlled conditions, and the base metals ranges from structural steel of different grades and aluminum alloys as well as titanium alloys. The obtained results show that the equivalent structural strain range parameter enables a unified presentation of the fatigue behaviors of all the test data investigated in this paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fire effects on concrete materials · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of different calculation methods for structural stresses at welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00167-6 ↗
2. Finite element methods for structural hot spot stress determination - a comparison of procedures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.04.003 ↗
3. Hobbacher · 2009
4. Application of neuber’s effective stress method for the evaluation of the fatigue behaviour of magnesium welds10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.023 ↗
5. Critical distance approach for the fatigue strength assessment of magnesium welded joints in contrast to Neuber's effective stress method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.004 ↗
6. Notch stress concepts for the fatigue assessment of welded joints–Background and applications10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.011 ↗
7. Radaj · 2006
8. A structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analysis of welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00055-X ↗
9. Analysis of recent fatigue data using the structural stress procedure in ASME Div 2 rewrite10.1115/1.2748818 ↗
10. A structural strain method for low-cycle fatigue evaluation of welded components10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.03.003 ↗
11. Pei XJ, Wang W, Dong PS. An analytical-based structural strain method for low cycle fatigue evaluation of girth-welded pipes. In: Proceedings of the ASME pressure vessels and piping conference, 2017, vol. 3b; 2017.10.1115/PVP2017-66006 ↗
12. An analytically formulated structural strain method for fatigue evaluation of welded components incorporating nonlinear hardening effects10.1111/ffe.12900 ↗
13. Dong PS, Pei XJ, Xing SZ. A structural strain method for fatigue evaluation of welded components. In: 33rd International conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, 2014, vol. 5; 2014.10.1115/OMAE2014-24546 ↗
14. A robust structural stress method for fatigue analysis of offshore/marine structures10.1115/1.1854698 ↗
15. Equilibrium-equivalent structural stress approach to fatigue analysis of a rectangular hollow section joint10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.008 ↗
16. Pei X, Dong P, Song S, Osage D. A comprehensive structural strain method incorporating strain-hardening effects: from LCF to ratcheting evaluations. In: ASME 2018 pressure vessels and piping conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2018. p. V01AT01A004–V001AT001A004.
17. Low cycle fatigue strength of butt-welded steel joint by means of new testing system with image technique10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.016 ↗
18. A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.001 ↗
19. Fatigue tests of piping components
20. The master SN curve method an implementation for fatigue evaluation of welded components in the ASME B&PV code, Section VIII, Division 2 and API 579–1/ASME FFS-1
21. Stresses and stress intensities at notches: ‘anomalous crack growth’ revisited10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00130-0 ↗
22. Harrison J. Fatigue performance of welded high strength steels, a compendium of reports from sponsored research programme. The Welding Institute, Abington Hall, Arbinton, Cambridge CBI 6AL, England; 1974.
23. Mei J. Modeling of multi-axial fatigue damage under non-proportional variable-amplitude loading conditions; 2017.
24. A path-dependent cycle counting method for variable-amplitude multi-axial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.010 ↗
25. Experimental and numerical analysis of fillet-welded joints under low-cycle fatigue loading by means of full-field techniques
26. Report 1: fatigue of butt-welded pipe
27. The master SN curve approach to fatigue of piping and vessel welds
28. Fatigue of titanium weldments: SN testing and analysis for data transferability among different joint types10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.12.008 ↗
29. An analytical SCF solution method for joint misalignments and application in fatigue test data interpretation10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.07.006 ↗
30. Ramberg W, Osgood WR. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters; 1943.