journal article·2012-07

Fatigue crack growth in a diverse range of materials

R. Jones, L. Molent, K. Walker

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper generally examines long crack growth data for a range of aerospace and rail materials tested at a variety of R ratios. The results of this study revealed that, for the 22 materials studied, the crack growth rate, da/dN, could be represented by a variant of the Hartman and Schijve equation with da/dN being proportional to the quantity ( Δ K - Δ K th ) α where α is approximately two. For cracking in 7050-T7451 it was also shown that this formulation holds for both long and small cracks, although a different value of ΔKth was required for small cracks compared to that required for long cracks. A possible explanation for this discrepancy is proposed and a methodology to estimate the small crack behaviour based on long crack data is presented. As such these observations have the potential to simplify the prediction of fatigue crack growth lives.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Molent L, Sun Q, Green AJ. The F/A-18 fatigue crack growth data compendium. DSTO-TR-1677. Melbourne, Australia; February 2005.
2. Evaluation of spectrum fatigue crack growth using variable amplitude data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.025 ↗
3. Recent developments in fatigue crack growth assessment10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.01.004 ↗
4. Jones R, Molent L. Critical review of the Generalised Frost-Dugdale approach to crack growth in F/A-18 Hornet structural materials. DSTO-RR-0350. Melbourne, Australia; March 2010.
5. Crack growth from small flaws10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.031 ↗
6. The effects of environment and load frequency on the crack propagation law for macro fatigue crack growth in aluminum alloys10.1016/0013-7944(70)90003-2 ↗
7. A quantitative analysis of structure sensitive fatigue crack growth in steels10.1016/0036-9748(84)90080-2 ↗
8. Wanhill RJH. Characteristic stress intensity factor correlations of fatigue crack growth in high strength alloys: reviews and completion of NLR investigations 1985–1990. NLR-TP-2009-256; September 2009.
9. Molent L, Barter S, Jones R. Some practical implications of exponential crack growth. In: Sih GC, editor. Multiscale fatigue crack initiation and propagation of engineering materials: structural integrity and microstructural worthiness. ISBN 978-1-4020-8519-2. Springer Press; June 2008.
10. A comparison of crack growth behaviour in several full-scale airframe fatigue tests10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.09.015 ↗
11. An experimental evaluation of fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.04.002 ↗
12. Short crack growth in polycrystalline materials10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.095 ↗
13. Short crack growth and fatigue life in austenitic-ferritic duplex stainless steel10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00936.x ↗
14. Potter JM, Yee BGW. Use of small crack data to bring about and quantify improvements to aircraft structural integrity. In: Proceedings AGARD specialists meeting on behavior of short cracks in airframe structure, Toronto, Canada; 1982.
15. A rational analytic theory of fatigue
16. Discussion on: Liu HW, Fatigue crack propagation and applied stress range
17. Fatigue crack propagation and applied stress range10.1115/1.3656501 ↗
18. Critical analysis of crack growth propagation laws10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
19. Forman RG, Kearney VE, Engle RM. Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic loaded structures. ASTM A. Mtg. Paper No. 66 WA/Met. 4; 1966.
20. Newman · 1984
21. Cyclic fracture toughness KIfc10.1007/BF00716622 ↗
22. Fatigue crack growth in a fillet welded joint10.1016/0013-7944(83)90130-3 ↗
23. An analysis of several fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) descriptions
24. Hahn GT, Rosenfield AR, Sarrate M. Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics, AFML-TR-67-143. USA: Wright Patterson Air Force Base; February 1970.10.21236/AD0866080 ↗
25. An analysis of the growth of short fatigue cracks10.1016/0013-7944(91)90151-P ↗
26. Prediction of the behaviour of small fatigue cracks10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.084 ↗
27. Frost NE. The growth of fatigue cracks. In: Yokobori T, editor. Proceedings of the first international conference on fracture. The Japanese Society for Strength and Fracture of Materials, Sendai; 1966. p. 1433–59.
28. Elastic–plastic analysis of the fatigue limit for a material with small flaws10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb01334.x ↗
29. Kitagawa H, Takahashi S. Applicability of fracture mechanics to very small cracks or the cracks in the early stage. In: Proceedings of second international conference on mechanical behaviour of materials. Metal Park: American Society for Metals; 1976. p. 627–31.
30. Hudak SJ, Jr., Saxena A, Bucci RJ, Malcolm RC. Development of standard methods of testing and analyzing fatigue crack growth rate data, AFML-TR-78-40. USA: Wright Patterson Air Force Base; 1978.
31. Forth SC, Johnston WM, Seshadri BR. The effect of the laboratory specimen on fatigue crack growth rate. In: Proceedings 16th European conference on fracture. Alexandropoulos, Greece; July 2006.
32. Forth SC. The purpose of generating fatigue crack growth threshold data. NASA Johnson Space Center. .
33. Hutař P, Seitl S, Kruml T. Effect of specimen geometry on fatigue crack propagation in threshold region. In: Proceedings international conference on fracture, Ottawa; 2009.
34. The influence of specimen geometry on near threshold fatigue crack growth10.1111/j.1460-2695.1987.tb00211.x ↗
35. A size effect on the fatigue crack growth rate threshold of alloy 718
36. Forth SC, James M, Johnston W. Development and validation of advanced test methods to generate fatigue crack growth and threshold data for use in damage tolerance analyses, DOT/FAA/AR-04/22; February 2008.
37. On generating fatigue crack growth thresholds10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00066-X ↗
38. Forth SC, Newman JC, Forman RG. Generating fatigue crack growth thresholds with constant amplitude loads. In: Blom AF, editor. Proceedings of the eighth international fatigue congress. Stockholm, Sweden: EMAS; June 2–7, 2002. ISBN 1 901537 28 5.
39. Newman JA, James MA, Johnston WM, Lee DD. Fatigue crack growth threshold testing of metallic rotorcraft materials. NASA/TM-2008-215331; July 2008.
40. Marci G. Failure mode below 390K with IMI 834, Fatigue 96. In: Lutjering G, Newack H, editors. Proceedings of the sixth international fatigue conference. vol. 1. Berlin, Germany: Pergamon, Oxford; 1996. p. 493–98.
41. Forth SC, James MA, Newman JA, Everett RA, Jr., Johnston WM, Jr. Mechanical data for use in damage tolerance analyses, NASA/TM-2004-213503 and ARL-TR-3375; December 2004.
42. Cracking in D6ac steel10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.12.005 ↗
43. Forth SC, James MA, Johnston WM, Newman, JC, Jr. Anomalous fatigue crack growth phenomena in high-strength steel. In: Proceedings int congress on fracture, Italy; 2007.
44. Avram J. ASTM E647 FCG testing standard: round robin fatigue crack growth testing results, final report. USAF TR 2006–10; November 2006.10.21236/ADA458296 ↗
45. Broek D, Schijve J. The influence of mean stress on the propagation of cracks in aluminium alloy sheet, NLR-TN-M.211, Amsterdam; January 1963.
46. Alperin BJ, Belsick CA. C-17 material specimen tests for fracture mechanics data, Phase I – Aluminum alloys. McDonnell Douglas Corp, Long Beach, Ca Douglas Aircraft Div; September 1984.
47. Forman RG, Shivakumar V, Cardinal JW, Williams LC, McKeighan PC. Fatigue crack growth data base for damage tolerance, analysis, DOT/FAA/AR-05/15; August 2005.
48. Fatigue crack growth discrepancies with stress ratio10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.01.004 ↗
49. Bell PD, Creager M. Crack growth analysis for arbitrary spectrum loading. vol. I. Results and discussion, final report. Technical Report AFFDL-TR-74-129, OH, USA; June 1972–October 1974.
50. Effect of load ratio and maximum stress intensity on the fatigue threshold in Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00099-0 ↗
51. Kalluri S, Telesman J. Characterization of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in Ti–6A1–4V with electrical potential drop technique. NASA Technical Memorandum 100877; July 1988.
52. Smith SW, Piascik RS. Fatigue crack growth characteristics of thin sheet titanium alloy Ti 6-2-2-2-2, NASA/TM-2001-210830; March 2001.
53. Similitude: cracking in steels10.1016/j.tafmec.2007.05.007 ↗
54. McKeighan PC, Feiger JH. Fatigue crack growth behavior of railroad tank car steel TC-128B subjected to various environments. vol. I and II, DOT/FRA/ORD-06/04.I; December 2006.
55. Constable T. Properties of experimental heats of low carbon bainitic-martensitic steels for railway wheels, Rail CRC Report. Task Rail CRC Project #41: New steels for railway wheels, Australia. Also published as M. Eng thesis. Monash University; July 2005.
56. Cummings D. AMSTED Rail International. Private Communication. Dec 2010.
57. Analytical prediction of short to long fatigue crack growth rate using small- and large-scale yielding fracture mechanics10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00126-9 ↗
58. Experimental studies into short crack growth10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.03.012 ↗
59. Sharp PK, Byrnes R, Clark G. Examination of 7050 fatigue crack growth data and its effect on life prediction, DSTO-TN-0729, Australia; 1998.
60. Iyyer NS, Dowling NE. Fatigue growth and closure of short cracks, AFWAL-TR-89-3008. OH, USA; 1989.
61. Walker K, Barter S. The critical importance of correctly characterising fatigue crack growth rates in the threshold regime. In: Proc 26 ICAF symposium, montreal Canada; 1–3 June 2011.10.1007/978-94-007-1664-3_20 ↗
62. Mixed-mode, high-cycle fatigue-crack growth thresholds in Ti–6Al–4V. I: A comparison of large- and short-crack behaviour10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00046-1 ↗