Effect of advancing direction on fatigue life of 316L stainless steel specimens treated by double-sided laser shock peening
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Laser shock peening (LSP) is considered as a well-established technology for inducing compressive residual stresses under the surface of metallic components. As a result, fatigue life is increased and the material becomes more resistant to corrosion and wear. This paper studies the effect of a significant parameter of LSP, the advancing direction of the laser scanning pattern, on the induced residual stress fields and the fatigue life of stainless steel 316L samples using experiments and 3D finite element analysis. The chosen material is of interest for nuclear and biomedical applications. Two different laser shock processing strategies (two different pulse sequences varying the advancing direction) were performed on the specimens. Their fatigue lives were compared revealing the decisive role played by the advancing direction of the treatment and the generated residual stresses. Fatigue life in laser peened specimens was increased from +166% to +471% by optimizing the pulse sequence. This improvement is explained by stress–strain analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Healthcare and Venom Research · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Improvement of fatigue life of Ti–6Al–4V alloy by laser shock peening10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.076 ↗
2. Corrosion susceptibility of peened friction stir welded 7075 aluminum alloy joints10.1016/j.corsci.2008.09.031 ↗
3. Wear and friction of 6061–T6 aluminum alloy treated by laser shock processing10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.014 ↗
4. Laser generated stress waves10.1063/1.1653116 ↗
5. Ultrafast laser-induced stress waves in solids10.1063/1.1653468 ↗
6. Effect of water and paint coatings on the magnitude of laser-generated shocks10.1016/0030-4018(76)90327-8 ↗
7. FEM Calculations of Residual Stresses Induced by Laser Shock Processing in Stainless Steels10.1088/0965-0393/15/3/002 ↗
8. Morales M, Correa C, Porro JA, Molpeceres C and Ocana JL. Thermomechanical modelling of stress fields in metallic targets subject to laser shock processing. In: Advances in laser shock peening theory and practice around the world: present solutions and future challenges, Int J Struct Integr (2011), Vol. 2 Number 1, pages 51-61.10.1108/17579861111108617 ↗
9. Numerical simulation of residual stresses fields of DD6 blade during laser shock processing10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.052 ↗
10. Simulation-based optimization of laser shock peening process for improved bending fatigue life of Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo alloy10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.003 ↗
11. Influence of pulse sequence and edge material effect on fatigue life of Al2024-T351 specimens treated by laser shock processing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.09.015 ↗
12. ASTM International: E8/E8M: Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. v. 09; 2010.
13. ABAQUS user’s manual, v. 6.13; 2014.
14. Prediction and characterization of residual stresses from laser shock peening10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.08.011 ↗
15. Massive parallel laser shock peening: simulation, analysis, and validation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.033 ↗
16. Finite element analysis of laser shock peening of 2050-T8 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.05.015 ↗
17. A finite element analysis of thermal relaxation of residual stress in laser shock processing NI-based alloy GH416910.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.054 ↗
18. Physical study of laser-produced plasma in confined geometry10.1063/1.346783 ↗
19. Overlapping rate effect on laser shock processing of 1045 steel by small spots with Nd:YAG pulsed laser10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.008 ↗
20. Peyre P, Hfaiedh N, Song H, Nivard M, Branly S, Ji V, Vignal V, Laser Shock Processing with two different laser sources on 2050-T8 aluminum alloy. In: Advances in Laser Shock Peening theory and practice around the world: present solutions and future challenges. Int J Surf Integr Special Issue. 2 Number 1 (2011), p. 87-100.10.1108/17579861111108644 ↗
21. A new effective method to estimate the effect of laser shock peening10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.008 ↗
22. Model based optimization criteria for the generation of deep compressive residual stress fields in high elastic limit metallic alloys by ns-laser shock processing10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.12.007 ↗
23. Shock waves from a water-confined laser-generated plasma10.1063/1.366113 ↗
24. Laser-shock processing of aluminium-coated 55C1 steel in water-confinement regime, characterization and application to high-cycle fatigue behaviour10.1023/A:1004331205389 ↗
25. Experimental determination by PVDF and EMV techniques of shock amplitudes by 0.6–3 ns laser pulses in a confined regime with water
26. Johnson GR, Cook WH. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics. The Hague; 1983. p. 541–7.
27. ASTM International:E837-08 Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain Gage Method. v. 04; 2008.
28. Hirano K, Sugihashi A, Imai H, Hamada N. Mecanism of anisotropic stress generation in laser peening processs. In: Proceedings of Icaleo’2006 conference, Miami, USA; 2006.10.2351/1.5060925 ↗