Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper conducts a comparative evaluation on typical critical plane criteria, including Fatemi-Socie, Wang-Brown, modified Smith-Watson-Topper (MSWT) and proposed modified generalized strain energy (MGSE) criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile/brittle materials. Experimental datasets of four materials under uniaxial tension, torsion and proportional/non-proportional multiaxial loadings are introduced for model comparison. This study results indicate that criteria with additional material constants yield robust life predictions for different materials. Moreover, the criteria with shear and uniaxial fatigue properties are respectively suitable for ductile and brittle materials, particularly the MGSE superior to others for ductile/brittle materials while MSWT only for brittle materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue assessment of notched specimens by means of a critical plane-based criterion and energy concepts10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.03.003 ↗
2. A critical distance/plane method to estimate finite life of notched components under variable amplitude uniaxial/multiaxial fatigue loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.015 ↗
3. Notch deformation and stress gradient effects in multiaxial fatigue10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.02.005 ↗
4. Innovative computational modeling of multiaxial fatigue analysis for notched components10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.03.019 ↗
5. Fatigue damage and life evaluation of SS304 and Al 7050–T7541 alloys under various multiaxial strain paths by means of energy-based fatigue damage models10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.04.007 ↗
6. New pseudo stress correction method for estimating local strains at notch under multiaxial cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.010 ↗
7. Engineering steels under combined cyclic and static stresses10.1243/PIME_PROC_1949_160_040_02 ↗
8. Behavior of metals under complex static and alternating stresses
9. Findley · 1958
10. Multiaxial fatigue: an overview and some approximation models for life estimation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
11. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
12. A new energy-critical plane damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction of turbine blades10.3390/ma10050513 ↗
13. Bannantine JA, Socie DF. A variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue life prediction methods. ICBMFF3; 1990.
14. Fatigue life under non-Gaussian random loading from various models10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.017 ↗
15. Ince A. Development of computational multiaxial fatigue modelling for notched components [Ph.D. thesis]. ON (Canada): University of Waterloo; 2012.
16. Comparative assessment of dissipated energy and other fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.007 ↗
17. Multiaxial fatigue damage parameter and life prediction without any additional material constants10.3390/ma10080923 ↗
18. Ductile versus brittle behaviour of crystals10.1080/14786437408213555 ↗
19. Difference in the creep and creep crack growth behaviour between creep ductile and brittle materials10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00083-6 ↗
20. Comparative study of multiaxial fatigue damage models for ductile structural steels and brittle materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.006 ↗
21. Ellyin F. A strain energy based criterion for multiaxial fatigue failure. Icmff 9; 2013.
22. Socie · 2000
23. Socie · 1993
24. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00739.x ↗
25. Wang CH, Brown MW. Multiaxial random load fatigue: life prediction techniques and experiments. ICBMFF4; 1996.
26. Probabilistic framework for multiaxial LCF assessment under material variability10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.019 ↗
27. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
28. A generalized fatigue damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction under proportional and non-proportional loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.007 ↗
29. Kandil FA, Brown MW, Miller KJ. Biaxial low-cycle fatigue failure of 316 stainless steel at elevated temperatures. In: Mechanical behaviour and nuclear applications of stainless steel at elevated temperatures; 1982.
30. The modified Manson-Coffin curve method to estimate fatigue lifetime under complex constant and variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.005 ↗
31. A fatigue criterion for general multiaxial loading10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00247.x ↗
32. An experimental evaluation of three critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.028 ↗
33. Zhao T. Fatigue of aluminum alloy 7075–T651 [Ph.D. thesis]. Reno: University of Nevada; 2008.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.07.005 ↗
34. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ61A magnesium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.020 ↗
35. Multiaxial fatigue life assessment of sintered porous iron under proportional and non-proportional loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.005 ↗
36. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for titanium alloy TC4 under proportional and nonproportional loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.028 ↗
37. Wu ZR, Li X, Fang L, et al. Evaluation of multiaxial fatigue life prediction criteria for Ni-based superalloy GH4169. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci, 2017 [in press]. http://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217708214.10.1177/0954406217708214 ↗
38. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
39. The effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of TC4-DT titanium alloys10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.033 ↗
40. A modified strain energy density exhaustion model for creep-fatigue life prediction10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.005 ↗
41. Creep-fatigue life prediction and interaction diagram in nickel-based GH4169 superalloy at 650 C based on cycle-by-cycle concept10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.021 ↗
42. Generalized probabilistic model allowing for various fatigue damage variables10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.031 ↗
43. Creep-fatigue behavior of turbine disc of superalloy GH720Li at 650 C and probabilistic creep-fatigue modeling10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.117 ↗
44. Probabilistic damage tolerance analysis on turbine disk through experimental data10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.03.008 ↗
45. A generalization of the fatigue Kohout-Věchet model for several fatigue damage parameters10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.009 ↗
46. Local unified probabilistic model for fatigue crack initiation and propagation: application to a notched geometry10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.009 ↗
47. Cyclic plastic strain based damage tolerance for railway axles in China10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.08.006 ↗
48. A unified multiaxial fatigue damage model for isotropic and aniso-tropic materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.011 ↗
49. A generalized energy-based fatigue-creep damage parameter for life prediction of turbine disk alloys10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.021 ↗
50. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.039 ↗
51. Mean stress effect correction in strain energy-based fatigue life prediction of metals10.1177/1056789516651920 ↗
52. Mean stress and ratcheting corrections in fatigue life prediction of metals10.1111/ffe.12569 ↗
53. Zhu SP, Liu Q, Lei Q, et al. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction and reliability assessment of a high pressure turbine disc considering load variations. Int J Damage Mech, 2018 [in press]. http://doi.org/10.1177/1056789517737132.10.1177/1056789517737132 ↗
54. Zhu SP, Liu Q, Zhou J, et al. Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine discs under multi-source uncertainties. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, 2018 [in press]. http://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12772.10.1111/ffe.12772 ↗