A novel method of multiaxial fatigue life prediction based on deep learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract It is well-known that conventional multiaxial fatigue life prediction models are generally limited to specific materials and loading conditions. To remove this limitation, a novel attempt is proposed in this work based on the deep learning (i.e., an improvement of artificial neural network in machine learning approaches, which is powerful to learn representations of data with multiple levels of abstraction). To comprehensively evaluate the prediction capability of proposed deep learning-based method, six series of existing fatigue data of different materials are, respectively, analyzed, in which the main loading conditions concerned in the low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue researches are included, such as loading modes (stress-controlled/strain-controlled modes), loading levels (stress/strain amplitude and mean stress/strain), and loading paths (uniaxial/multiaxial and proportional/non-proportional paths), as well as for low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue regimes. Comparison of the predicted and experimental results shows that: all the loading conditions mentioned above can be handled satisfactorily by the proposed deep learning-based method; excellent prediction accuracy is achieved, and the predicted lives in each study case fall almost within the scatter band of 1.5 times. In addition, four groups of specifically designed data are used to evaluate the extrapolation capability of the proposed method, and the results show that the extrapolation capability gets weaker if the distinctions between the loading paths involved in the training dataset and test one increase.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
2. Multiaxial fatigue: An overview and some approximation models for life estimation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
3. A review on fatigue life prediction methods for metals10.1155/2016/9573524 ↗
4. Advances in fatigue life modeling: A review10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.047 ↗
5. Multiaxial fatigue: a stress based criterion for hard metals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.006 ↗
6. Using enclosing ellipsoids in multiaxial fatigue strength criteria10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.07.006 ↗
7. A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00673.x ↗
8. Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: on the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00459.x ↗
9. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion for hard metals10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00075-X ↗
10. A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress-strain conditions10.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_161_02 ↗
11. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00739.x ↗
12. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
13. A stress-strain parameter for the fatigue of metals
14. Low-cycle fatigue under non-proportional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb01020.x ↗
15. Nonproportional low cycle fatigue of 6061 aluminum alloy under 14 strain paths10.1016/S1566-1369(99)80006-5 ↗
16. Analysis of the experimental data on a low cycle fatigue under nonproportional straining10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00005-0 ↗
17. A generalized fatigue damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction under proportional and non-proportional loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.007 ↗
18. A universally applicable multiaxial fatigue criterion in 2D cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.013 ↗
19. A novel energy-based equivalent damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.11.025 ↗
20. Low cycle fatigue and creep–fatigue interaction behavior of 316L(N) stainless steel and life prediction by artificial neural network approach10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00064-1 ↗
21. Fatigue life prediction of unidirectional glass fiber/epoxy composite laminae using neural networks10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00179-3 ↗
22. Artificial neural networks in spectrum fatigue life prediction of composite materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.03.004 ↗
23. Life prediction for rate-dependent low-cycle fatigue of PA6 polymer considering ratchetting: Semi-empirical model and neural network based approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105619 ↗
24. A novel approach based on the elastoplastic fatigue damage and machine learning models for life prediction of aerospace alloy parts fabricated by additive manufacturing
25. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
26. A criterion for fully reversed out-of-phase torsion and bending10.1520/STP36242S ↗
27. Multiaxial fatigue life estimations for 6082–T6 cylindrical specimens under in-phase and out-of-phase biaxial loadings10.1016/S1566-1369(03)80006-7 ↗
28. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for titanium alloy TC4 under proportional and nonproportional loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.028 ↗
29. Uniaxial ratchetting and low-cycle fatigue failure of the steel with cyclic stabilizing or softening feature10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.029 ↗
30. Multiaxial ratchetting–fatigue interactions of annealed and tempered 42CrMo steels: Experimental observations10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.002 ↗
31. Multiaxial fatigue of rubber: Part II: experimental observations and life predictions10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00895.x ↗
32. Biaxial high-cycle fatigue life assessment of ductile aluminium cruciform specimens10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.08.007 ↗
33. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
34. Olah C. Understanding lstm networks. 2015. Retrieved from http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/.
35. Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 2014. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
36. Brownlee J. How Much Training Data is Required for Machine Learning? 2017. Machine Learning Mastery. Retrieved from https://machinelearningmastery.com/much-training-data-required-machine-learning/.
37. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
38. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks
39. Predicting the 3D fatigue crack growth rate of small cracks using multimodal data via Bayesian networks: In-situ experiments and crystal plasticity simulations10.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.007 ↗
40. Machine learning and the physical sciences10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 ↗
41. Explainable machine learning for scientific insights and discoveries10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976199 ↗