The influence of additive manufacturing processing parameters on surface roughness and fatigue life
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Additive manufacturing (AM) is used to create metal components with complex geometries where the internal surfaces cannot easily be post machined. Fatigue behavior in additively manufactured metals is largely driven by defects in the material such as porosity and surface roughness. This work investigates the processing-structure-property-performance (PSPP) relationship for varied contour processing parameters, and the resulting surface roughness features for alloy 718 fabricated using the laser powder bed fusion AM process. Two nondestructive characterization methods are used to determine the relationships between contour parameters and surface roughness characteristics. The benefits of each characterization technique and metrics required for an accurate representation of the additively manufactured surfaces are discussed. Axial fatigue testing is performed to connect the entire PSPP relationship. An understanding of the PSPP relationship with respect to surface roughness features and fatigue life can be used to guide future process parameter optimization and to inform the qualification strategy for AM components.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Laser Material Processing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Characterization of typical surface effects in additive manufacturing with confocal microscopy10.1088/2051-672X/3/1/014001 ↗
2. Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
3. On the surface quality of additive manufactured parts
4. Effect of process parameters on the surface roughness of overhanging structures in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
5. Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
6. Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing10.1088/2051-672X/3/2/024002 ↗
7. Progress toward standardized additive manufacturing test artifacts
8. Whip · 2018
9. Characterization of metal additive manufacturing surfaces using synchrotron X-ray CT and micromechanical modeling10.1007/s00466-017-1531-z ↗
10. An examination of the effects from surface texture on the strength of fiber reinforced plastics10.1177/002199839903300201 ↗
11. Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00012-9 ↗
12. Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053 ↗
13. Multiaxial fatigue behavior of wrought and additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V including surface finish effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.044 ↗
14. Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
15. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
16. Effects of defects, surface roughness and HIP on fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.055 ↗
17. Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
18. Integrated control of solidification microstructure and melt pool dimensions in electron beam wire feed additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V
19. Integrated melt pool and microstructure control for Ti-6Al-4V thin wall additive manufacturing10.1179/1743284714Y.0000000704 ↗
20. Location specific solidification microstructure control in electron beam melting of Ti-6Al-4V
21. Crystallographic texture engineering through novel melt strategies via electron beam melting: Inconel 71810.1179/1743284714Y.0000000697 ↗
22. Geometry dependent microstructures: bug or feature?10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.024 ↗
23. Relating porosity to fatigue failure in additively manufactured alloy 71810.1016/j.msea.2018.04.075 ↗
24. Society AM. Heat treatment wrought nickel alloy and cobalt alloy parts; 2016.
25. Standard specification for additive manufacturing nickel alloy (UNS N07718) with powder bed fusion
26. ISO 25178-2. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – surface texture: Areal- Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters; 2012.
27. “Investigation of complementary use of optical metrology and X-ray computed tomography for surface finish in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
28. M R. Natick (MA): The MathWorks, Inc.; 2017b.
29. Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗