Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The additive manufacturing (AM) is expected to be a promising manufacturing process for high strength or hard steels such as Ti-6Al-4V for the aerospace industry components having complex shapes. However, disadvantage or challenge of AM is presence of defects which are inevitably contained in the manufacturing process. This paper focuses on the effects of defects, surface roughness and Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) process on the fatigue strength of a Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by AM. Defects were mostly gas pores and those made by lack of fusion. Many defects which were formed at subsurface were eliminated by HIP and eventually HIP improved fatigue strength drastically to the level of the ideal fatigue limit to be expected from the hardness. Surface roughness had strong detrimental influence on fatigue strength. The method for estimating the effective size √areaeffmax of irregularly shaped defects and interacting adjacent defects was proposed from the viewpoint of fracture mechanics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Introduction Slides for Additive Manufacturing, Metal Technology Co. Ltd; 2018. .
2. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
3. Damage development and damage tolerance of structures manufactured by selective laser melting – a review10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.071 ↗
4. Fatigue design with additive manufactured metals: issues to consider and perspective for future research10.1016/j.proeng.2018.02.002 ↗
5. Lewandowski JJ, Seifi M. Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties (Postprint), AFRL-RX-WP-JA-2017-0156. Interim Report, 19; 2016.
6. Overview of materials qualification needs for metal additive manufacturing10.1007/s11837-015-1810-0 ↗
7. Fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V in the very high cycle fatigue regime10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018 ↗
8. Fatigue properties of AlSi10Mg obtained by additive manufacturing: defect-based modelling and prediction of fatigue strength10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.002 ↗
9. Improvement of fatigue resistance and ductility of Ti-6Al-4V processed by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.01.025 ↗
10. Analysis of defect generation in Ti-6Al-4V parts made using powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes
11. Critical assessment of the fatigue performance of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V and perspective for future research10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.003 ↗
12. Fatigue strength prediction for titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by selective lase melting10.1007/s11661-015-2864-x ↗
13. Murakami · 2002
14. Statistical analysis of fatigue test data10.2472/jsms.29.24 ↗
15. Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength10.1016/0142-1123(94)90001-9 ↗
16. Growth and stability of interacting surface flaws of arbitrary shape10.1016/0013-7944(83)90027-9 ↗
17. Notch effects in high cycle fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.750.232 ↗
18. Fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloys containing small defects
19. Interaction effect of adjacent defects on the fatigue limit of a medium carbon steel10.1111/ffe.12482 ↗
20. Fatigue properties of EMB as-built and chemically etched thin parts10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.073 ↗
21. Defect analysis and fatigue design basis for Ni-based superalloy 718 manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.054 ↗
22. Influence of defect size on the fatigue resistance of AlSi10Mg alloy elaborated by selective laser melting (SLM)10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.063 ↗
23. Serrano-Munoz I, Buffiere J-Y, Mokso R, Verdu C, Nadot Y. Location, location & size: defects close to surfaces dominate fatigue crack initiation. Scientific Reports | 7:45239 | DOI: 10.1038/srep45239, 2017: 1–9.10.1038/srep45239 ↗
24. Small defects and inhomogeneities in fatigue strength: experiment, models and statistical implications10.1023/A:1009976418553 ↗
25. Qualification of AM parts: extreme value statistics applied to tomographic measurements10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091 ↗
26. Isida M, Effect of width and length on stress intensity factors of internally cracked plates under various boundary conditions. Int J Frac 1971;7-3:301−316 [See also Y. Murakami Y, Editor-in-chief, Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Vol. 1, Pergamon Press, 1987: 68, and Murakami Y, Theory of Elasticity and Stress Concentration, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2017: 81].10.1007/BF00184306 ↗
27. Murakami Y, Editor-in-chief, Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Vol. 2, Pergamon Press; 1987. p. 653.