journal article·2025-06-01Open access

Osteomimetic bioceramic scaffolds with high-fidelity human-bone features produced by rotational printing

Shumin Pang, Dongwei Wu, Dorian A H Hanaor, Astrid Haibel, Jens Kurreck, Aleksander Gurlo

Abstract

Abstract Scaffolds that emulate the architecture of human bone, combined with strong mechanical stability and biocompatibility, are vital for promoting effective bone tissue regeneration. However, most existing bone-mimetic scaffolds fall short in reproducing the intricate hierarchical structure of human bone, which restricts their practical application. This study introduces a novel strategy that combines rotational three-dimensional (3D) printing technology and sponge replication technique to fabricate bone-mimetic scaffolds based on composite materials comprising copper-substituted diopside and biphasic calcium phosphate. The scaffolds closely mimic the structure of human bone, featuring both cancellous and cortical bone with Haversian canals. Additionally, the scaffolds exhibit high porosity and transport capacity, while exhibiting compressive strength that is on par with human bone under both axial and lateral loads. Moreover, they demonstrate good biocompatibility and the potential to induce and support osteogenesis and angiogenesis. The scaffolds produced here present a pathway to remediating particularly large bone defects. Given their close resemblance to human bone structure and function, these scaffolds may be well-suited for developing in vitro bone disease models for pharmaceutical testing and various biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Bone tissue engineering techniques, advances, and scaffolds for treatment of bone defects10.1016/j.cobme.2020.100248 ↗
2. 3D/4D printed bio-piezoelectric smart scaffolds for next-generation bone tissue engineering10.1088/2631-7990/acd88f ↗
3. Recent advances in bio-functional Ta-based bone materials: materials design and bioactivity10.1088/2631-7990/ad7b03 ↗
4. A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: toward a cell-free strategy10.1002/btm2.10206 ↗
5. Simulation of cortical and cancellous bone to accelerate tissue regeneration10.1002/adfm.202301839 ↗
6. Bioinspired mineralized collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.004 ↗
7. Bone structure: from cortical to calcium10.1016/j.mporth.2020.03.002 ↗
8. Development of a bone-mimetic 3D printed Ti6Al4V scaffold to enhance osteoblast-derived extracellular vesicles’ therapeutic efficacy for bone regeneration10.3389/fbioe.2021.757220 ↗
9. Bioactive glass/polycaprolactone hybrid with a dual cortical/trabecular structure for bone regeneration10.1021/acsabm.9b00407 ↗
10. 3D bioprinting of osteon-mimetic scaffolds with hierarchical microchannels for vascularized bone tissue regeneration10.1088/1758-5090/ac6700 ↗
11. 3D printing of Haversian bone-mimicking scaffolds for multicellular delivery in bone regeneration10.1126/sciadv.aaz6725 ↗
12. Bioinspired techniques in freeze casting: a survey of processes, current advances, and future directions10.1155/2022/9169046 ↗
13. Freeze casting: from low-dimensional building blocks to aligned porous structures-a review of novel materials, methods, and applications10.1002/adma.201907176 ↗
14. Manufacturing and characterization of highly porous bioactive glass composite scaffolds using unidirectional freeze casting10.1002/adem.201700129 ↗
15. Multiscale engineered artificial compact bone via bidirectional freeze-driven lamellated organization of mineralized collagen microfibrils10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.02.005 ↗
16. Spinnability of collagen as a biomimetic material: a review10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.024 ↗
17. Recent progress in protective membranes fabricated via electrospinning: advanced materials, biomimetic structures, and functional applications10.1002/adma.202107938 ↗
18. 3D printing biomimetic materials and structures for biomedical applications10.1007/s42242-020-00117-0 ↗
19. 3D printed grafts with gradient structures for organized vascular regeneration10.1088/2631-7990/ad2f50 ↗
20. Embedding aligned nanofibrous architectures within 3D-printed polycaprolactone scaffolds for directed cellular infiltration and tissue regeneration10.1088/2631-7990/acbd6c ↗
21. 3D bioprinting of gellan gum and poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate based hydrogels to produce human-scale constructs with high-fidelity10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.040 ↗
22. Bioprinting of perfusable vascularized organ models for drug development via sacrificial‐free direct ink writing10.1002/adfm.202314171 ↗
23. Enhanced mechanical performance and bioactivity in strontium/copper co-substituted diopside scaffolds10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213230 ↗
24. Foam replica method in the manufacturing of bioactive glass scaffolds: out-of-date technology or still underexploited potential?10.3390/ma14112795 ↗
25. Optimization of composite bone scaffolds prepared by a new modified foam replica technique10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103293 ↗
26. Additive manufacturing and performance of bioceramic scaffolds with different hollow strut geometries10.1088/1758-5090/acb387 ↗
27. Applying extrusion-based 3D printing technique accelerates fabricating complex biphasic calcium phosphate-based scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.012 ↗
28. Optimal regenerative repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.09.024 ↗
29. High performing additively manufactured bone scaffolds based on copper substituted diopside10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110480 ↗
30. Rheological characterisation of ceramic inks for 3D direct ink writing: a review10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.031 ↗
31. Man vs. machine: automated bioink mixing device improves reliability and reproducibility of bioprinting results compared to human operators10.36922/ijb.1974 ↗
32. Porosity of human mandibular condylar bone10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00693.x ↗
33. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) Co-culture with osteogenic cells: from molecular communication to engineering prevascularised bone grafts10.3390/jcm8101602 ↗
34. In vitro osteogenesis assays: influence of the primary cell source on alkaline phosphatase activity and mineralization10.1016/j.patbio.2008.06.004 ↗
35. Examination of mineralized nodule formation in living osteoblastic cultures using fluorescent dyes10.1002/bp060274b ↗
36. Role of angiogenesis in bone repair10.1016/j.abb.2014.07.006 ↗
37. Bone tissue engineering scaffolds: function of multi-material hierarchically structured scaffolds10.1002/adhm.202202766 ↗
38. Synthetic and Bone tissue engineering graft substitutes: what is the future?10.1016/j.injury.2020.07.040 ↗
39. 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024 ↗
40. Different post-processing conditions for 3D bioprinted α-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds10.1007/s10856-017-5989-1 ↗
41. Design and fabrication of 3D printed scaffolds with a mechanical strength comparable to cortical bone to repair large bone defects10.1038/srep19468 ↗
42. Preparation and characterization of 3D nanocomposite scaffold from bioactive glass/β-tricalcium phosphate via Robocasting method for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121769 ↗
43. Fabrication and characterization of porous bone scaffold of bovine hydroxyapatite-glycerin by 3D printing technology10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00078 ↗
44. Mechanical and biological evaluation of 3D printed 10CeTZP-Al 2 O 3 structures10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.012 ↗
45. 3D printing bioceramic porous scaffolds with good mechanical property and cell affinity10.1371/journal.pone.0143713 ↗
46. 3D printed bioceramic scaffolds: adjusting pore dimension is beneficial for mandibular bone defects repair10.1002/term.3287 ↗
47. Compressive strength of β-TCP scaffolds fabricated via lithography-based manufacturing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.085 ↗
48. Using ductile cores for enhancing the mechanical performance of hollow strut β-TCP scaffolds fabricated by digital light processing10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.165 ↗
49. Digital light processing (DLP) of nano biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramic for making bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.067 ↗
50. 3D gel-printing of hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.300 ↗
51. Fabrication of trabecular-like beta-tricalcium phosphate biomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.184 ↗
52. Rapid prototyping technology for bone regeneration
53. When the total hip replacement fails: a review on the stress-shielding effect10.3390/pr10030612 ↗
54. Mechanical interaction between additive-manufactured metal lattice structures and bone in compression: implications for stress shielding of orthopaedic implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104608 ↗
55. Orientation dependence of progressive post-yield behavior of human cortical bone in compression10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.034 ↗
56. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
57. Biphasic calcium phosphate microspheres in biomedical applications10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.09.004 ↗
58. Evaluating material-driven regeneration in a tissue engineered human in vitro bone defect model10.1016/j.bone.2022.116597 ↗
59. How does scaffold porosity conduct bone tissue regeneration?10.1002/adem.202100463 ↗
60. Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.01.007 ↗
61. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a review10.1039/C7BM00315C ↗
62. Tailoring porous media for controllable capillary flow10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.068 ↗