journal article·2023-09-01Open access

Robotic in situ bioprinting for cartilage tissue engineering

Yaxin Wang, Rúben F Pereira, Chris Peach, Boyang Huang, Cian Vyas, Paulo Bartolo

Abstract

Abstract Articular cartilage damage caused by trauma or degenerative pathologies such as osteoarthritis can result in significant pain, mobility issues, and disability. Current surgical treatments have a limited capacity for efficacious cartilage repair, and long-term patient outcomes are not satisfying. Three-dimensional bioprinting has been used to fabricate biochemical and biophysical environments that aim to recapitulate the native microenvironment and promote tissue regeneration. However, conventional in vitro bioprinting has limitations due to the challenges associated with the fabrication and implantation of bioprinted constructs and their integration with the native cartilage tissue. In situ bioprinting is a novel strategy to directly deliver bioinks to the desired anatomical site and has the potential to overcome major shortcomings associated with conventional bioprinting. In this review, we focus on the new frontier of robotic-assisted in situ bioprinting surgical systems for cartilage regeneration. We outline existing clinical approaches and the utilization of robotic-assisted surgical systems. Handheld and robotic-assisted in situ bioprinting techniques including minimally invasive and non-invasive approaches are defined and presented. Finally, we discuss the challenges and potential future perspectives of in situ bioprinting for cartilage applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication: a guide to technology and terminology10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015 ↗
2. A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks10.1088/1758-5090/aaec52 ↗
3. From in vitro to in situ tissue engineering10.1007/s10439-014-1022-8 ↗
4. In situ bioprinting—bioprinting from benchside to bedside?10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.045 ↗
5. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs10.1038/nbt.2958 ↗
6. 3D bioprinting: materials, processes, and applications10.1016/j.cirp.2022.06.001 ↗
7. Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues10.1039/C7LC01236E ↗
8. Direct-write 3D printing and characterization of a GelMA-based biomaterial for intracorporeal tissue engineering10.1088/1758-5090/ab97a1 ↗
9. Preliminary engineering for in situ in vivo bioprinting: a novel micro bioprinting platform for in situ in vivo bioprinting at a gastric wound site10.1088/1758-5090/aba4ff ↗
10. Biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration: development and perspectives10.1039/C5TB01863C ↗
11. Biomaterials for tissue engineering10.1007/s003450050002 ↗
12. Biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration: a review10.3390/biom9110750 ↗
13. 3D bioprinting via an in situ crosslinking technique towards engineering cartilage tissue10.1038/s41598-019-56117-3 ↗
14. In situ bioprinting of autologous skin cells accelerates wound healing of extensive excisional full-thickness wounds10.1038/s41598-018-38366-w ↗
15. Handheld instrument for wound-conformal delivery of skin precursor sheets improves healing in full-thickness burns10.1088/1758-5090/ab6413 ↗
16. In situ printing of mesenchymal stromal cells, by laser-assisted bioprinting, for in vivo bone regeneration applications10.1038/s41598-017-01914-x ↗
17. Robotic in situ 3D bio-printing technology for repairing large segmental bone defects10.1016/j.jare.2020.11.011 ↗
18. In situ printing of adhesive hydrogel scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries10.1021/acsabm.9b01176 ↗
19. In vivo printing of nanoenabled scaffolds for the treatment of skeletal muscle injuries10.1002/adhm.202002152 ↗
20. Application of robotic-assisted in situ 3D printing in cartilage regeneration with HAMA hydrogel: an in vivo study10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.010 ↗
21. Development of the Biopen: a handheld device for surgical printing of adipose stem cells at a chondral wound site10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/015019 ↗
22. Handheld co-axial bioprinting: application to in situ surgical cartilage repair10.1038/s41598-017-05699-x ↗
23. In situ handheld three‐dimensional bioprinting for cartilage regeneration10.1002/term.2476 ↗
24. Robotic-assisted 3D bio-printing for repairing bone and cartilage defects through a minimally invasive approach10.1038/s41598-019-38972-2 ↗
25. Additive manufacturing for in situ repair of osteochondral defects10.1088/1758-5082/2/3/035004 ↗
26. Intra‐operative bioprinting of hard, soft, and hard/soft composite tissues for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction10.1002/adfm.202010858 ↗
27. The challenge of cartilage integration: understanding a major barrier to chondral repair10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0244 ↗
28. Cartilage integration: evaluation of the reasons for failure of integration during cartilage repair. A review10.22203/eCM.v016a04 ↗
29. Beyond cartilage repair: the role of the osteochondral unit in joint health and disease10.1089/ten.teb.2018.0122 ↗
30. Biological perspectives and current biofabrication strategies in osteochondral tissue engineering10.1007/s40898-020-00008-y ↗
31. Surgical and tissue engineering strategies for articular cartilage and meniscus repair10.1038/s41584-019-0255-1 ↗
32. In-situ tissue regeneration through SDF-1α driven cell recruitment and stiffness-mediated bone regeneration in a critical-sized segmental femoral defect10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.032 ↗
33. Improved in situ seeding of 3D printed scaffolds using cell-releasing hydrogels10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.027 ↗
34. Athanasiou · 2016
35. Unlike bone, cartilage regeneration remains elusive10.1126/science.1222454 ↗
36. Articular cartilage repair: current needs, methods and research directions10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.07.013 ↗
38. Articular cartilage: structure, injuries and review of management10.1093/bmb/ldn025 ↗
39. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee arthritis and meniscal tears: a clinical practice guideline10.1136/bmj.j1982 ↗
40. Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 ↗
41. Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty: surgical technique10.2106/00004623-200403001-00009 ↗
42. Cartilage immunoprivilege depends on donor source and lesion location10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.025 ↗
43. The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study10.1177/0363546503261730 ↗
44. The effect of angled osteochondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study10.1177/0363546505281236 ↗
45. Minimum ten-year results of a prospective randomised study of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage lesions of the knee10.1302/0301-620X.94B4.27495 ↗
46. Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a systematic review10.2106/JBJS.J.00049 ↗
47. Articular cartilage tissue engineering: the role of signaling molecules10.1007/s00018-015-2115-8 ↗
48. Instructive cartilage regeneration modalities with advanced therapeutic implantations under abnormal conditions10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.002 ↗
49. Polymer fiber scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering10.1002/adfm.201903279 ↗
50. Collagen-alginate as bioink for three-dimensional (3D) cell printing based cartilage tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2017.09.002 ↗
51. Bio-inspired hydrogel composed of hyaluronic acid and alginate as a potential bioink for 3D bioprinting of articular cartilage engineering constructs10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.046 ↗
52. Hyaluronic acid‐based bioink composition enabling 3D bioprinting and improving quality of deposited cartilaginous extracellular matrix10.1002/adhm.202000737 ↗
53. Chitosan hydrogel/3D-printed poly (ϵ‐caprolactone) hybrid scaffold containing synovial mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration based on tetrahedral framework nucleic acid recruitment10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121131 ↗
54. Structurally and functionally optimized silk‐fibroin–gelatin scaffold using 3D printing to repair cartilage injury in vitro in vivo10.1002/adma.201701089 ↗
55. 3D printed silk-gelatin hydrogel scaffold with different porous structure and cell seeding strategy for cartilage regeneration10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.013 ↗
56. Crosslinker-free silk/decellularized extracellular matrix porous bioink for 3D bioprinting-based cartilage tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2020.111388 ↗
57. Direct 3D printing of decellularized matrix embedded composite polycaprolactone scaffolds for cartilage regeneration10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213052 ↗
58. PLA short sub-micron fiber reinforcement of 3D bioprinted alginate constructs for cartilage regeneration10.1088/1758-5090/aa90d7 ↗
59. Synthesis and 3D printing of biodegradable polyurethane elastomer by a water‐based process for cartilage tissue engineering applications10.1002/adhm.201400018 ↗
60. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based composite bone-substitute materials10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.016 ↗
61. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomaterials promote bone regeneration10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100774 ↗
62. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomimetically hierarchical scaffold for augmented bone regeneration10.1002/adma.202202044 ↗
63. Induction of cartilage integration by a chondrocyte/collagen-scaffold implant10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.052 ↗
64. Response of chondrocytes to local mechanical injury in an ex vivo model10.1177/1947603511421155 ↗
65. Chondrocyte migration affects tissue-engineered cartilage integration by activating the signal transduction pathways involving Src, PLCγ1, and ERK1/210.1089/ten.tea.2012.0614 ↗
66. Hyperosmolarity normalises serum-induced changes to chondrocyte properties in a model of cartilage injury10.22203/eCM.v031a14 ↗
67. Chondrocyte mechanotransduction: effects of compression on deformation of intracellular organelles and relevance to cellular biosynthesis10.1016/j.joca.2004.08.004 ↗
68. The mechanobiology of articular cartilage: bearing the burden of osteoarthritis10.1007/s11926-014-0451-6 ↗
69. The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134311 ↗
70. A systematic review of robotic surgery: from supervised paradigms to fully autonomous robotic approaches10.1002/rcs.2358 ↗
71. The history of robotics in surgical specialties10.1166/ajrs.2014.1006 ↗
72. Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: five-year clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1355.R2 ↗
73. The first clinical application of a “hands-on” robotic knee surgery system10.3109/10929080109146302 ↗
74. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1 ↗
75. An assessment of early functional rehabilitation and hospital discharge in conventional versus robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0564.R2 ↗
76. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves accuracy and precision compared to conventional techniques10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2003.R1 ↗
77. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37240 ↗
78. Knee joint distraction compared with total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0099.R3 ↗
79. Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial10.1097/CORR.0000000000000916 ↗
80. Effects of experience and workplace culture in human-robot team interaction in robotic surgery: a case study10.1007/s12369-012-0170-y ↗
81. Workflow in robotic surgery
82. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology10.1007/s00464-018-6079-2 ↗
83. Simple biomanipulation tasks with “steady hand” cooperative manipulator
84. VerroTouch: high-frequency acceleration feedback for telerobotic surgery
85. The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9 ↗
86. Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?10.1007/s00464-012-2182-y ↗
87. Senhance surgical system: robotic-assisted digital laparoscopy for abdominal, pelvic, and thoracoscopic procedures
88. Current limitations of surgical robotics in reconstructive plastic microsurgery10.3389/fsurg.2018.00022 ↗
89. An open-source handheld extruder loaded with pore-forming bioink for in situ wound dressing10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100074 ↗
90. Noninvasive in vivo 3D bioprinting10.1126/sciadv.aba7406 ↗
91. Intravital three-dimensional bioprinting10.1038/s41551-020-0568-z ↗
92. Improving piezoelectric cell printing accuracy and reliability through neutral buoyancy of suspensions10.1002/bit.24562 ↗
93. 25th anniversary article: engineering hydrogels for biofabrication10.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
94. 3D bioprinting of photocrosslinkable hydrogel constructs10.1002/app.42458 ↗
95. Laser-assisted bioprinting for creating on-demand patterns of human osteoprogenitor cells and nano-hydroxyapatite10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/025001 ↗
96. 3D bioprinting of tissue/organ models10.1002/anie.201505062 ↗
97. 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011 ↗
98. 3D bioprinting of complex channels within cell-laden hydrogels10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.038 ↗
99. Lyophilized scaffolds fabricated from 3D-printed photocurable natural hydrogel for cartilage regeneration10.1021/acsami.8b10926 ↗
100. In situ repair of bone and cartilage defects using 3D scanning and 3D printing10.1038/s41598-017-10060-3 ↗