Recent advances in bio-functional Ta-based bone materials: materials design and bioactivity
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ta-based materials have gained significant interest for bioimplantable scaffolds because of their appropriate mechanical characteristics and biocompatibility. To overcome the serious limitation of bioinertness, there have been many efforts to enhance the bioactivity and osseointegration of Ta-based scaffolds through morphostructural and surface modifications. As scaffolds are implantable devices, sufficient bioactivity is needed to trigger the cellular functions required for tissue engineering. Consequently, a combination of materials and bioscience is needed to develop efficient Ta-based scaffolds, although reviews of this interdisciplinary field remain limited. This review aims to provide an overview of the main strategies to enhance the bioactivity of Ta-based scaffolds, describing the basic mechanisms and research methods of osseointegration, and the approaches to enhance bioactivity and osseointegration. These approaches are divided into three main sections: (i) alteration of the micromorphology, (ii) customization of the scaffold structure, and (iii) functionalization modifications (through alloying or the addition of surface coatings). Also provided are recent advances regarding biocompatibility assessment in vitro, osseointegration properties in vivo, and clinical trial results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Orthopedic devices market size, share & trends analysis report by product (joint replacement/orthopedic implants, sports medicine, orthobiologics), by end-use (hospitals, outpatient facilities), by region, and segment forecasts, 2023–2030 · 2023
2. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
3. Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial10.1111/jcpe.13058 ↗
4. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management10.1177/2041731418776819 ↗
5. Histological evaluation of the healing process of various bone graft materials after engraftment into the human body10.3390/ma11050714 ↗
6. Autograft, allograft, and bone graft substitutes: clinical evidence and indications for use in the setting of orthopaedic trauma surgery10.1097/BOT.0000000000001420 ↗
7. Natural origin materials for osteochondral tissue engineering
8. A short review on polymer, metal and ceramic based implant materials10.1088/1757-899X/1017/1/012038 ↗
9. Pina · 2018 · vol 1058
10. Oxygen-deficient bioceramics: combination of diagnosis, therapy, and regeneration10.1002/adma.202302858 ↗
11. A review of bioceramics scaffolds for bone defects in different types of animal models: HA and β-TCP10.1088/2057-1976/ac867f ↗
12. Improved biodegradation resistance by grain refinement of novel antibacterial ZK30-Cu alloys produced via selective laser melting10.1016/j.matlet.2018.11.071 ↗
13. Porous metal implants: processing, properties, and challenges10.1088/2631-7990/acdd35 ↗
14. Effect of grain refinement and crystallographic texture produced by friction stir processing on the biodegradation behavior of a Mg-Nd-Zn alloy10.1016/j.jmst.2018.11.025 ↗
15. Competitive surface colonization of antibacterial and bioactive materials doped with strontium and/or silver ions10.3390/nano10010120 ↗
16. Biomedical materials and techniques to improve the tribological, mechanical and biomedical properties of orthopedic implants—a review article10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.231 ↗
17. Wear, corrosion, and biocompatibility of 316L stainless steel modified by well-adhered Ta coatings10.1007/s11665-022-06928-9 ↗
18. Advanced micro- & nanostructuring for enhanced biocompatibility of stainless steel by multi-beam and beamshaping technology10.1088/1748-605X/acd291 ↗
19. Corrosion and antibacterial performance of novel selective-laser-melted (SLMed) Ti-xCu biomedical alloys10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158415 ↗
20. Contributions of Ti-xTa cold spray composite interface to in-vitro cell growth10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100007 ↗
21. A review on NiTi alloys for biomedical applications and their biocompatibility10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.538 ↗
22. Shape memory alloy as an internal splint in a rat model of excisional wound healing10.1088/1748-605X/abda89 ↗
23. Recent advances in Fe-based bioresorbable stents: materials design and biosafety10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.07.024 ↗
24. Study on Fe-xGO composites prepared by selective laser melting: microstructure, hardness, biodegradation and cytocompatibility10.1007/s11837-019-03814-z ↗
25. Comparative study on biodegradation of pure iron prepared by microwave sintering and laser melting10.3390/ma15041604 ↗
26. Accelerated biodegradation of iron-based implants via tantalum-implanted surface nanostructures10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.003 ↗
27. Enhanced initial biodegradation resistance of the biomedical Mg-Cu alloy by surface nanomodification10.1016/j.jma.2021.12.013 ↗
28. Optimized structure design of asymmetrical Mg alloy cerebrovascular stent with high flexibility10.1016/j.smmf.2023.100040 ↗
29. Influence of graphene oxide (GO) on microstructure and biodegradation of ZK30-xGO composites prepared by selective laser melting10.1016/j.jma.2019.10.004 ↗
30. Corrosion and biological performance of biodegradable magnesium alloys mediated by low copper addition and processing10.1016/j.msec.2018.08.013 ↗
31. Construction of tantalum/poly(ether imide) coatings on magnesium implants with both corrosion protection and osseointegration properties10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.007 ↗
32. Microstructural, mechanical and electrochemical characterization of TiZrTaHfNb and Ti1.5ZrTa0.5Hf0.5Nb0.5 refractory high-entropy alloys for biomedical applications10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106572 ↗
33. Corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel in a physiological environment: the effect of citrate ions10.1016/j.addma.2020.101237 ↗
34. Improving the bio-corrosion behavior of AISI316L stainless steel through deposition of Ta-based thin films using PACVD10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.154 ↗
35. Synchrotron-based characterization of arthroprosthetic CoCrMo particles in human bone marrow10.1007/s10856-022-06675-2 ↗
36. Wear of CoCrMo alloys used in metal-on-metal hip joints: a tribocorrosion appraisal10.1016/j.wear.2012.11.061 ↗
37. Formation of oxides on CoCrMo surfaces at room temperature: an XPS study10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.004 ↗
38. Titanium-tissue interface reaction and its control with surface treatment10.3389/fbioe.2019.00170 ↗
39. The importance of metallic materials as biomaterials10.15406/atroa.2017.03.00054 ↗
40. The physicochemical/biological properties of porous tantalum and the potential surface modification techniques to improve its clinical application in dental implantology10.1016/j.msec.2015.01.007 ↗
41. Recent advances in Ti-6Al-4V additively manufactured by selective laser melting for biomedical implants: prospect development10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163072 ↗
42. Newly developed Ti-Nb-Zr-Ta-Si-Fe biomedical beta titanium alloys with increased strength and enhanced biocompatibility10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.043 ↗
43. Correlation of the nanostructure of the anodic layers fabricated on Ti13Nb13Zr with the electrochemical impedance response10.1016/j.corsci.2015.01.041 ↗
44. Biomechanics and mechanobiology of the bone matrix10.1038/s41413-022-00223-y ↗
45. Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.012 ↗
46. Research progress on the design and performance of porous Ti alloy bone implants10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.155 ↗
47. Biologically and mechanically biocompatible titanium alloys10.2320/matertrans.L-MRA2008828 ↗
48. Tantalum and its derivatives in orthopedic and dental implants: osteogenesis and antibacterial properties10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112055 ↗
49. The improved biological performance of a novel low elastic modulus implant10.1371/journal.pone.0055015 ↗
50. 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: methods, applications and future prospects10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004 ↗
51. Hydrothermal calcification surface modification of biomedical tantalum10.1007/s12598-020-01559-2 ↗
52. Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.030 ↗
53. In vitro and in vivo study of 3D-printed porous tantalum scaffolds for repairing bone defects10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01094 ↗
54. The clinical application of porous tantalum and its new development for bone tissue engineering10.3390/ma14102647 ↗
55. Niobium and other high temperature refractory metals for aerospace applications
56. Application and recycling of tantalum from waste electric and electronic equipment-a review10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106866 ↗
57. Other metallic alloys: tantalum-based materials for biomedical applications
58. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion10.1089/107632700300003297 ↗
59. Advances in surface modification of tantalum and porous tantalum for rapid osseointegration: a thematic review10.3389/fbioe.2022.983695 ↗
60. Tantalum as trabecular metal for endosseous implantable applications10.3390/biomimetics8010049 ↗
61. Porous tantalum: a new biomaterial in orthopedic surgery
62. Growth of hydroxyapatite coatings on tantalum by plasma electrolytic oxidation in a single step10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.079 ↗
63. Does tantalum exhibit any intrinsic antimicrobial or antibiofilm properties10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1309.R1 ↗
64. The effects of various metallic surfaces on cellular and bacterial adhesion10.3390/met9111145 ↗
65. Antibacterial properties and cytocompatibility of tantalum oxide coatings10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.03.061 ↗
66. In vitro biocompatibility of a nanocrystalline β-Ta2O5 coating for orthopaedic implants10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.040 ↗
67. Hydrophilicity of bioactive titanium surface with different structure, composition, crystal form and grain size10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.133 ↗
68. Influences of tantalum pentoxide and surface coarsening on surface roughness, hydrophilicity, surface energy, protein adsorption and cell responses to PEEK based biocomposite10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.10.081 ↗
69. Interfacial frictional behavior: cancellous bone, cortical bone, and a novel porous tantalum biomaterial10.1142/S0218957799000269 ↗
70. A comprehensive review of biological and materials properties of tantalum and its alloys10.1002/jbm.a.37373 ↗
71. Bránemark · 2005
72. Osseointegration: a review of the fundamentals for assuring cementless skeletal fixation10.2147/ORR.S59274 ↗
73. Preparation, modification, and clinical application of porous tantalum scaffolds10.3389/fbioe.2023.1127939 ↗
74. Bone response to porous tantalum implants in a gap-healing model10.1111/clr.13402 ↗
75. Porous tantalum and titanium in orthopedics: a review10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00493 ↗
76. Porous tantalum structures for bone implants: fabrication, mechanical and in vitro biological properties10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.046 ↗
77. Tantalum-coated pedicle screws enhance implant integration10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.08.059 ↗
78. Osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells on micro-patterned surfaces10.1177/0885328211428094 ↗
79. Transcriptomic profiling of tantalum metal implant osseointegration in osteopenic patients10.1038/s41405-018-0004-6 ↗
80. Effect of porous tantalum on promoting the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in vitro through the MAPK/ERK signal pathway10.1016/j.jot.2019.03.006 ↗
81. From the performance to the essence: the biological mechanisms of how tantalum contributes to osteogenesis10.1155/2020/5162524 ↗
82. Reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation and possible pharmaceutical targets of ROS-mediated osteoclast diseases10.3390/ijms20143576 ↗
83. How is mechanobiology involved in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward the osteoblastic or adipogenic fate10.1002/jcp.28099 ↗
84. Extracellular matrix stiffness controls osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells mediated by integrin α5.10.1186/s13287-018-0798-0 ↗
85. Enhanced osseointegration ability of poly(lactic acid) via tantalum sputtering-based plasma immersion ion implantation10.1021/acsami.8b21363 ↗
86. Recent advances in research on antibacterial metals and alloys as implant materials10.3389/fcimb.2021.693939 ↗
87. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook10.1302/2058-5241.4.180092 ↗
88. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion10.1038/s41579-018-0019-y ↗
89. Evaluating antimicrobials and implant materials for infection prevention around transcutaneous osseointegrated implants in a rabbit model10.1002/jbm.a.32413 ↗
90. Microbial biofilm growth vs. tissue integration: “the race for the surface” experimentally studied10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.011 ↗
91. Competitive colonization of prosthetic surfaces by Staphylococcus aureus and human cells10.1002/jbm.a.35863 ↗
92. “Race for the surface”: eukaryotic cells can win10.1021/acsami.6b06415 ↗
93. Why is tantalum less susceptible to bacterial infection10.3390/jfb13040264 ↗
94. A comprehensive review of 3D printing techniques for biomaterial-based scaffold fabrication in bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.stlm.2023.100141 ↗
95. Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.smmf.2022.100011 ↗
96. Research progress of 3D printing materials in stomatology. IOP Conf10.1088/1755-1315/332/3/032013 ↗
97. Advances in 3D printing scaffolds for peripheral nerve and spinal cord injury repair10.1088/2631-7990/acde21 ↗
98. Application of additively manufactured bone scaffold: a systematic review10.1088/1758-5090/ad35e8 ↗
99. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060 ↗
100. Additive manufacturing of metallic components -process, structure and properties10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗