journal article·2026-07-21

Coupled peridynamics and scaled boundary finite element method for the dynamic fracture problem on polygonal meshes

Wei Yu, Jun Liu, Lei Gan, Caichu Xia, Zhongming Jiang, Wenbin Ye, Tugen Feng, Haibo Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

To address two critical bottlenecks in peridynamics (PD), namely its strong dependence on uniform discretization and the difficulty in boundary condition implementation, this study proposes a novel Peri-PolySBFEM framework. The framework achieves its advances through three key innovations. First, polygonal meshes are adopted to replace conventional quadrilateral and triangular discretization, thereby effectively improving geometric adaptability for complex configurations. Second, scaled boundary shape functions derived from the Laplace's equation in the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) are embedded into the discontinuous Galerkin weak form of the peridynamic momentum equation. This coupling converts the nonlocal double integrals of PD into a matrix operation form similar to standard finite element methods. Third, an effective boundary correction scheme is developed, which calibrates the micromodulus function by maintaining strain energy density consistency between PD and classical continuum mechanics. Systematic validation through elastic wave propagation, dynamic crack branching, and Kalthoff–Winkler impact tests demonstrates that the framework offers superior excellent control, δ -convergence, and m-convergence, collectively confirming its accuracy, convergence, and reliability in dynamic fracture simulation. The current framework is established and validated for two-dimensional problems. Future work will focus on extending this method to three-dimensional cases and multiphysics coupling analyses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dalian University of Technology

Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou, China

Hohai University

Ningbo University

Changsha University of Science & Technology

Jiangxi University of Science and Technology

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program · National Postdoctoral Researcher Support Program · Yangtze River Water Science Research Joint Fund Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/nme.319610.1002/nme.3196 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10915-026-03242-710.1007/s10915-026-03242-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apnum.2026.01.01110.1016/j.apnum.2026.01.011 ↗
4. Ankur R, Jiwari R, Narayan A (2025) Conformal finite element methods for nonlinear Rosenau-Burgers-Biharmonic models. Journal of Scientific Computing 104(3): 86.10.1007/s10915-025-02997-9 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00466-014-1023-310.1007/s00466-014-1023-3 ↗
6. 10.1002/nme.94110.1002/nme.941 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.02210.1016/j.cma.2017.11.022 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cma.2020.11339810.1016/j.cma.2020.113398 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10911710.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109117 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00466-022-02202-w10.1007/s00466-022-02202-w ↗
11. 10.1038/216038a010.1038/216038a0 ↗
12. 10.1002/nme.689310.1002/nme.6893 ↗
13. 10.1111/cgf.1323610.1111/cgf.13236 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.10.01410.1016/j.cma.2010.10.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.03210.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.032 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10704-014-9970-410.1007/s10704-014-9970-4 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10724610.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107246 ↗
19. 10.1002/nme.559610.1002/nme.5596 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10704-010-9442-410.1007/s10704-010-9442-4 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10338-021-00307-y10.1007/s10338-021-00307-y ↗
22. 10.32604/cmes.2023.02692210.32604/cmes.2023.026922 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cma.2018.05.00710.1016/j.cma.2018.05.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.04.03610.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.04.036 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.04810.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.11.048 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10737510.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107375 ↗
27. Kalthoff J (2003) Failure methodology of mode-II loaded cracks. Facta Universitatis. Series Mechanics Automatic Control and Robotics. 3.
28. 10.1002/nag.235610.1002/nag.2356 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.11249510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2023.112495 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2024.10579910.1016/j.enganabound.2024.105799 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00366-023-01792-010.1007/s00366-023-01792-0 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10704-023-00709-810.1007/s10704-023-00709-8 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00466-020-01839-910.1007/s00466-020-01839-9 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cma.2025.11780310.1016/j.cma.2025.117803 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10909610.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109096 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cma.2010.03.03110.1016/j.cma.2010.03.031 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.10717910.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107179 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00466-014-1101-610.1007/s00466-014-1101-6 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.003 ↗
40. 10.1007/s10704-018-0317-410.1007/s10704-018-0317-4 ↗
41. 10.1002/nme.525710.1002/nme.5257 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cma.2016.12.03110.1016/j.cma.2016.12.031 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11565610.1016/j.cma.2022.115656 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2019.12.01610.1016/j.enganabound.2019.12.016 ↗
45. 10.1007/s00366-022-01730-610.1007/s00366-022-01730-6 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cma.2021.11454410.1016/j.cma.2021.114544 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.003 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10659-007-9125-110.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10915-025-03125-310.1007/s10915-025-03125-3 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.apnum.2026.02.00210.1016/j.apnum.2026.02.002 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-210.1016/S0045-7825(97)00021-2 ↗
54. 10.1007/s00466-025-02667-510.1007/s00466-025-02667-5 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.03210.1016/j.jmps.2016.05.032 ↗
56. 10.1007/s11044-023-09948-y10.1007/s11044-023-09948-y ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.00910.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.009 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2018.12.00710.1016/j.enganabound.2018.12.007 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.01510.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cma.2022.11519310.1016/j.cma.2022.115193 ↗
61. 10.1002/nme.728710.1002/nme.7287 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.00610.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.006 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10250510.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102505 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.10735410.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107354 ↗
65. 10.4208/cicp.OA-2022-001210.4208/cicp.OA-2022-0012 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10354610.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103546 ↗
67. 10.1002/nag.333310.1002/nag.3333 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.10420510.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104205 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cma.2017.11.01110.1016/j.cma.2017.11.011 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.12119510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121195 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11747710.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117477 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11026410.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110264 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.01110.1016/j.tafmec.2018.04.011 ↗