A novel multi-objective optimization framework for tensile properties of carbon/Kevlar fiber-reinforced composite laminates based on improved hybrid SPEA2-MOPSO algorithm and TOPSIS method
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid fiber-reinforced composite laminates are extensively employed across various engineering applications owing to their superior comprehensive mechanical performance. However, effectively balancing competing performance parameters remains critical to maximizing their overall structural capabilities and meeting practical engineering requirements. To address this challenge, this study presents a multi-objective optimization framework for the design of carbon/Kevlar fiber-reinforced composite laminates, with a focus on the influence of ply material and stacking sequence on tensile behavior under load. Initially, optimal Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) was employed to generate training samples, and a corresponding simulation database was established via finite element analysis to construct a surrogate model. A novel optimization framework was then developed by integrating a Kriging surrogate model with a hybrid strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2–multi-objective particle swarm optimization (SPEA2-MOPSO) algorithm and the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Within this framework, the ply sequence and material type served as decision variables, while tensile strength, tensile modulus, and elongation at break were considered as optimization objectives. The research results show that the finite element simulation using the progressive damage model was verified by the tensile test, which confirmed the accuracy of damage prediction and revealed the synergistic effect among tensile performance parameters. A comparative analysis of three optimization algorithms, namely MOPSO, SPEA2, and the hybrid SPEA2-MOPSO, demonstrated the superior accuracy and efficiency of the hybrid approach in solving complex multi-objective problems. Finally, the application of the TOPSIS method enabled the identification of optimal trade-off solutions tailored to various engineering priorities, providing practical guidance for structural design decisions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xiamen University of Technology
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacture for Bus Coach, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, Fujian, China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation Project of the Xiamen Municipal Science and Technology Bureau · Natural Science Foundation Project of the Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/002199832093739610.1177/0021998320937396 ↗
2. ASTM D3039. (n.d.) Standard tests method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
3. Azhdari S, Taheri-Behrooz F. (2023). An experimental and numerical investigation on bending after impact strength of glass laminate aluminium reinforced epoxy. Composites Part A-Applied Science And Manufacturing 2023: 171.
4. 10.1177/1056789525132465510.1177/10567895251324655 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.aej.2020.09.01510.1016/j.aej.2020.09.015 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.03910.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.039 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.10320410.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103204 ↗
8. 10.1177/1056789525134239910.1177/10567895251342399 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10807710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.108077 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10789710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107897 ↗
11. Coello C Ing D Lechuga M. (2002) MOPSO: A Proposal for Multiple Objective Particle Swarm. In Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation IEEE 2002; CEC'02 (Cat. No. 02TH8600) (Vol. 2 pp. 1051-1056).10.1109/CEC.2002.1004388 ↗
12. Fakoor M, Ghoreishi SMN, Aminjafari M (2019) Multi-objective optimization of buckling load for a laminated composite plate by coupling genetic algorithm and FEM. Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology 12(1): 27–37.
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11655110.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116551 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11675610.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116756 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.10537810.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105378 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2009.01.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10614910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106149 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.07.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13196810.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131968 ↗
20. 10.1177/1056789524130254310.1177/10567895241302543 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11074610.1016/j.tws.2023.110746 ↗
22. 10.1007/s42417-025-02309-310.1007/s42417-025-02309-3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11105310.1016/j.tws.2023.111053 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.dt.2020.06.01710.1016/j.dt.2020.06.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10918010.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109180 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10866410.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108664 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10530710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105307 ↗
28. 10.1016/B978-155860595-4/50003-610.1016/B978-155860595-4/50003-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.09310.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.093 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11661310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116613 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-025-86476-z10.1038/s41598-025-86476-z ↗
32. 10.1007/s00158-022-03393-910.1007/s00158-022-03393-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.03510.1016/j.asoc.2015.12.035 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10685110.1016/j.tws.2020.106851 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.01410.1016/j.asoc.2016.02.014 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.03710.1016/j.asoc.2011.01.037 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11888610.1016/j.compstruct.2025.118886 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11463810.1016/j.eswa.2021.114638 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcde.2018.04.00410.1016/j.jcde.2018.04.004 ↗
40. Shi Y Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In 1998 IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation proceedings. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (Cat. No. 98TH8360); 1998 May ;(pp. 69-73).10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146 ↗
41. 10.5220/000556850400040510.5220/0005568504000405 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.04.017 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11825210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118252 ↗
44. 10.1109/TEVC.2004.82689510.1109/TEVC.2004.826895 ↗
45. 10.1177/095440701772463610.1177/0954407017724636 ↗
46. 10.1007/s12206-016-1010-z10.1007/s12206-016-1010-z ↗
47. 10.1002/pc.2956110.1002/pc.29561 ↗
48. 10.1177/0021998324124610910.1177/00219983241246109 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11208610.1016/j.tws.2024.112086 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11710110.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117101 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10825710.1016/j.tws.2021.108257 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11591910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115919 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11810410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118104 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11010310.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110103 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11830510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118305 ↗
56. Zeidabadi SA, Nik ER, Hejazi TH (2023) Multi-objective robust production planning considering workforce efficiency with a metaheuristic solution approach. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 30(1): 32–50.
57. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.12060010.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120600 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.coco.2025.10241110.1016/j.coco.2025.102411 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11598310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115983 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11092010.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110920 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.08210.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.082 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10777110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107771 ↗
63. Zitzler E (1999) Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications. Shaker Ithaca.