Axial compressive behaviour of substandard concrete confined with 3D-printed PLA strips
Source abstract
Abstract
This study explores the potential of polylactic acid (PLA) strips as sustainable reinforcement material for substandard concrete requiring enhanced axial load-bearing capacity. Experimental tests and nonlinear finite element analyses were conducted to evaluate the influence of PLA confinement on the axial compressive behaviour of concrete cylinders. The results demonstrate that PLA strips can increase compressive strength with notable improvements in stiffness and ductility depending on strip configuration and spacing. The numerical simulations showed strong agreement with the experimental data, validating the observed behavioural trends. According to numerical case study, compared with conventional carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP), PLA exhibited lower mechanical performance but offered clear environmental advantages, with significantly lower embodied energy and global warming potential than commonly used externally bonded reinforcement material. While the present work is a proof-of-concept study limited to axial loading, the findings highlight the promise of PLA as an eco-friendly alternative for low-carbon strengthening applications. In future applications, combining PLA with conventional reinforcement materials may offer an optimized balance between mechanical performance and ecological impact.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Gazi University
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Dokuz Eylül University
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s13369-014-1411-110.1007/s13369-014-1411-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10785710.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107857 ↗
3. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2019a) ASTM C192/C192M - Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory.
4. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2019b) ASTM C215 - Test Method for Fundamental Transverse Longitudinal and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete Specimens.
5. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2021) ASTM C39/C39M - Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.
6. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2022) ASTM E1876 - Test Method for Dynamic Youngs Modulus Shear Modulus and Poissons Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration.
7. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.13710.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.137 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11266010.1016/j.jobe.2025.112660 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00198-710.1016/S0921-5093(99)00198-7 ↗
10. 10.3390/buildings1307175910.3390/buildings13071759 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14500010.1016/j.cej.2023.145000 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110450 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10924-016-0787-210.1007/s10924-016-0787-2 ↗
14. Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp. (2022) ABAQUS/CAE.
15. 10.1051/matecconf/20181860200410.1051/matecconf/201818602004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.06510.1016/j.istruc.2023.05.065 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.04010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.040 ↗
18. Du Beton CE-I, de la Précontrainte FI (2012) CEB-FIP Model Code 2010 for Concrete Structures. CEB-FIP.
19. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.14310.1016/j.rser.2017.05.143 ↗
20. European Standards (2012) EN 933-1: Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - Part 1: Determination of particle size distribution - Sieving method.
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13015810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130158 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.04710.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12203810.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122038 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40964-024-00704-y10.1007/s40964-024-00704-y ↗
26. 10.3390/polym1507165110.3390/polym15071651 ↗
27. 10.1108/RPJ-04-2017-005510.1108/RPJ-04-2017-0055 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.007 ↗
29. 10.2749/101686616X108110.2749/101686616X1081 ↗
30. 10.3311/PPme.1368310.3311/PPme.13683 ↗
31. 10.1533/9780857090928.1.310.1533/9780857090928.1.3 ↗
32. 10.1177/073168441663060910.1177/0731684416630609 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.01810.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14465910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.144659 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11803-019-0507-810.1007/s11803-019-0507-8 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10323910.1016/j.jobe.2021.103239 ↗
38. 10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-410.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.01810.1016/j.resconrec.2019.05.018 ↗
40. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.00310.1016/j.compositesb.2012.06.003 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.16310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.163 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.10210.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.102 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.06610.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.066 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.12010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.120 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12175010.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121750 ↗
47. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000003110.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000031 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1702019110.3390/polym17020191 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12205-020-1682-x10.1007/s12205-020-1682-x ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12608110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126081 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.07210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.072 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.029 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.10896210.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108962 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.02810.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.028 ↗
55. Silva Le, Christoforo AL, Carvalho RC (2021) Calibration of concrete damaged plasticity model parameters for shear walls. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro) 26: e12944.10.1590/s1517-707620210001.1244 ↗
56. Sözen MA (1987) Towards a behaviour based design of reinforced concrete frames to resist earthquake. In: Proceeding of 9th Technical Conference of Turkish Society of Civil Engineering, Ankara, pp 1–47.
57. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.00110.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.001 ↗
58. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(201)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(201) ↗
59. 10.1680/stco.2007.8.4.18710.1680/stco.2007.8.4.187 ↗
60. 10.1089/ind.2010.6.21210.1089/ind.2010.6.212 ↗
61. 10.1177/155892502095819510.1177/1558925020958195 ↗
62. 10.1007/s11069-024-06859-910.1007/s11069-024-06859-9 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.020 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00107-020-01644-410.1007/s00107-020-01644-4 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.istruc.2025.10852810.1016/j.istruc.2025.108528 ↗
66. Zhu S, Xu Z, Qin X, et al. (2021) Fiber-reinforcing effect in the mechanical and road performance of cement-emulsified asphalt mixtures. Materials 14: 1–14.
67. 10.3390/en1715371310.3390/en17153713 ↗