An interpretable hybrid stacking framework for uncertainty-aware forecasting of structural deformation and damage evolution in concrete dams
Source abstract
Abstract
Long-term dam deformation is governed by coupled hydrostatic, thermal and aging effects, producing noisy, nonlinear and temporally dependent monitoring series that are difficult to model with conventional statistical or single machine/deep learning approaches. This study proposes an interpretable hybrid stacking framework, RF–DEGWO–LSTM, for uncertainty-aware dam deformation forecasting. Random forest (RF) acts as a nonlinear feature-based learner and provides embedded feature importance; differential evolution grey wolf optimizer (DEGWO) is used to tune key long short-term memory (LSTM) hyperparameters; and a meta-learner fuses RF and DEGWO–LSTM outputs into a unified predictor that explicitly captures time-varying, non-stationary relationships between hydrostatic, thermal and aging factors and displacement. The framework is validated using long-term monitoring data from two dams (a concrete gravity dam and a run-of-the-river dam). Comparative experiments against RF, plain LSTM, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and DEGWO–LSTM show that the RF–DEGWO–LSTM model consistently achieves the highest R 2 and the lowest error metrics. In the most challenging scenario, RF–DEGWO–LSTM improves test-set R 2 by approximately 5–10% and reduces root mean square error by about 15–20% relative to the best single-model baseline. Residual analyses indicate reduced bias and variance, while interpretability based on RF feature importance and LSTM attention confirms the dominant roles of hydrostatic and seasonal components, with aging effects being secondary. Accurate forecasting of deformation is critical for early identification of damage evolution and integrity loss in large civil infrastructure. The proposed framework thus offers an accurate, robust and interpretable tool for data-driven dam deformation forecasting and early-warning-oriented structural health management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dam Engineering and Safety · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Yangzhou University
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Thamar University, Dhamar, Yemen
Intelligent Water Conservancy Research Institute, Nanjing Jurise Engineering Technology, Nanjing, China
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.08010.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.080 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0313510.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03135 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10994-023-06467-x10.1007/s10994-023-06467-x ↗
4. 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.02810.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.028 ↗
5. 10.3390/diagnostics1602032210.3390/diagnostics16020322 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11749-016-0481-710.1007/s11749-016-0481-7 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
8. 10.1186/1471-2105-2-310.1186/1471-2105-2-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0097-8485(01)00113-910.1016/S0097-8485(01)00113-9 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12205-022-1553-810.1007/s12205-022-1553-8 ↗
11. 10.3390/w1610138810.3390/w16101388 ↗
12. 10.1002/stc.217010.1002/stc.2170 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.08110.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.081 ↗
14. Fang CJY, Wang X, Lu T, et al. (2024) A dam displacement prediction method based on a model combining random forest, a convolutional neural network, and a residual attention informer. Water 3687(16(24)): 6 .
15. 10.3390/w1609123910.3390/w16091239 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ress.2017.07.01810.1016/j.ress.2017.07.018 ↗
17. Goulet Coulombe P (2020) The macroeconomy as a random forest. Available at SSRN 3633110. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3633110.10.2139/ssrn.3633110 ↗
18. Graves A, Fernández S, Schmidhuber J (2005) Bidirectional LSTM networks for improved phoneme classification and recognition. In: Artificial neural networks: formal models and their applications – ICANN 2005. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
19. 10.3390/su1512960910.3390/su15129609 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.10265210.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102652 ↗
21. 10.1177/014233121770824210.1177/0142331217708242 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-710.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11097810.1016/j.ress.2025.110978 ↗
24. 10.3390/w1416253810.3390/w14162538 ↗
25. 10.1029/2024WR03716610.1029/2024WR037166 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10462-021-09993-z10.1007/s10462-021-09993-z ↗
27. Kalusivalingam AK, Sharma A, Patel N, et al. (2021) Leveraging deep learning and random forest algorithms for ai-driven genomics in personalized medicine. International Journal of AI and ML 2(3).
28. 10.1533/978184569682510.1533/9781845696825 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12277810.1016/j.eswa.2023.122778 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.10591210.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105912 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.05610.1016/j.enbuild.2018.06.056 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40745-021-00344-x10.1007/s40745-021-00344-x ↗
33. 10.1002/stc.250110.1002/stc.2501 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.aei.2021.10151010.1016/j.aei.2021.101510 ↗
35. Li M, Pan J, Liu Y, et al. (2022b) Dam deformation forecasting using SVM-DEGWO algorithm based on phase space reconstruction. PLOS ONE 17: e0267434.
36. 10.1007/s11831-020-09434-010.1007/s11831-020-09434-0 ↗
37. 10.3390/buildings1515280310.3390/buildings15152803 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2024.10727610.1016/j.compstruc.2024.107276 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00521-019-04375-710.1007/s00521-019-04375-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.10770410.1016/j.knosys.2021.107704 ↗
41. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.310897310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3108973 ↗
42. 10.3390/electronics1219402610.3390/electronics12194026 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11884510.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118845 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10810610.1016/j.jobe.2023.108106 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apm.2023.10.03010.1016/j.apm.2023.10.030 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10610610.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106106 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.00710.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
48. 10.1155/2024/171001910.1155/2024/1710019 ↗
49. Pascanu R, Mikolov T, Bengio Y (2012) On the difficulty of training Recurrent Neural Networks. In: 30th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2013.
50. 10.1007/s00500-020-04848-110.1007/s00500-020-04848-1 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41598-024-64526-210.1038/s41598-024-64526-2 ↗
52. 10.3390/s2113454410.3390/s21134544 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.11217710.1016/j.ymssp.2024.112177 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11831-015-9157-910.1007/s11831-015-9157-9 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.12553110.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125531 ↗
56. 10.1007/s13349-020-00380-w10.1007/s13349-020-00380-w ↗
57. 10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.01110.1016/j.asej.2020.07.011 ↗
58. 10.1002/stc.203710.1002/stc.2037 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cageo.2022.10503410.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.00310.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41598-023-49754-210.1038/s41598-023-49754-2 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10955710.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109557 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10924210.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109242 ↗
64. 10.1002/stc.260310.1002/stc.2603 ↗
65. 10.3390/w1613186810.3390/w16131868 ↗
66. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.302152710.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021527 ↗
67. 10.3390/app1308516010.3390/app13085160 ↗
68. 10.3390/w1621304310.3390/w16213043 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12082710.1016/j.eswa.2023.120827 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.00710.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.007 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.05.00610.1016/j.compstruc.2019.05.006 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.10614910.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106149 ↗