Fatigue life prediction for titanium alloy under multiaxial very high and low cycle combined thermo-mechanical loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The investigation found that von Mises equivalent stress used to calculate multiaxial fatigue damage cannot reflect the contribution of shear stress to damage in the very high cycle regime, as well as the influence of shear-to-axial ratio on the damage behavior of titanium alloy is revealed under multiaxial very high cycle loading. Based on the damage mechanism, a method was proposed to equivalently convert multiaxial stresses into uniaxial form in the very high cycle regime, and the experimental verification results under different shear-to-axial ratios showed that almost all of the fatigue life prediction errors are within a factor of 2.5. Moreover, the coupled effects of multiaxial low-cycle fatigue loading, multiaxial very high-cycle fatigue loading, and temperature loading will transform the crack propagation mode into one that is co-dominated by fatigue and creep. According to the damage mechanism, an interactive damage model was proposed, and a brand-new life prediction method was developed by combining the proposed equivalent method, the multiaxial fatigue damage model and creep damage model. The experimental verification results under multiaxial very high and low cycle combined thermo-mechanical fatigue loading show that all prediction errors are within a factor of 2.5.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Technology
Beijing CISRI-GAONA Materials and Technology Co., Ltd.
Tiangong University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.017 ↗
2. Bannantine JA, Socie DF (1988) Observations of cracking behavior in tension and torsion low cycle fatigue. In: Solomon HD, Halford GR, Kaisand LR, etal (eds) ASTM symposium on low Cycle Fatigue. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM STP, vol. 942, 899–921.
3. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00135-710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00135-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00136-910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00136-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10739310.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107393 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10783810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107838 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10831210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108312 ↗
8. 10.1111/ffe.1390710.1111/ffe.13907 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.02210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.05.022 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.007 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.05510.1016/j.msea.2015.06.055 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10647410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106474 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10347210.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103472 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.01.01010.1016/j.jmst.2022.01.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.10715410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107154 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13805510.1016/j.msea.2019.138055 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10871310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108713 ↗
20. 10.1111/ffe.1314010.1111/ffe.13140 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.03010.1016/j.msea.2015.10.030 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10264110.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102641 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.09.00310.1016/j.tafmec.2018.09.003 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00123-010.1016/S0142-1123(97)00123-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10275710.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102757 ↗
26. Smith RN, Waston PP, Topper TH (1970) A stress-strain parameter for the fatigue of metals. J Mater 5: 767–778.
27. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.01610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.016 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.011 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.10265610.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102656 ↗
31. Trufyakov VI, Kovalchuk VS (1982) Determination of life under two-frequency loading: Report 2: Proposed method[J]. Strength Mater 10: 15–20.
32. 10.1115/1.280682110.1115/1.2806821 ↗
33. 10.1115/1.280682210.1115/1.2806822 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10824010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108240 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10824010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108240 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10333710.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103337 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1007069810.3390/ma10070698 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.06210.1016/j.msea.2007.04.062 ↗