Ensemble learning-based artificial intelligence approaches for predicting low-cycle fatigue life for aluminum alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper comprehensively analyzes the artificial intelligence (AI) models that predict low-cycle fatigue life for an aluminum alloy, considering tension–compression and torsion–torsion experiments. The study highlights the crucial need for precise fatigue life predictions to ensure the reliability and safety of structures subjected to different cyclic loading conditions. By incorporating diverse loading scenarios, the aim is to develop AI models that surpass traditional approaches’ limitations, offering enhanced predictive capabilities. This work explores the potential of AI models for fatigue life prediction, focusing on bridging the gap between traditional learning and ensemble learning predictive techniques. Its analysis improves the understanding of fatigue and contributes to developing accurate and versatile predictive tools. The ensemble learning techniques that combine the strengths of different algorithms are targeted to assess their performance. Based on the methodology, the results provide a thorough explanation of the proposed AI models for normal and shear strain-controlled cyclic loading conditions. The impact of ensemble learning methods, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, extra trees, and nearest neighbors are investigated on the accuracy of fatigue life prediction. A comparative evaluation of these AI models in terms of their predictive capabilities in different strain scenarios is presented. This approach enhances the overall efficacy of the learning system by considering a host of perspectives and drawing on the strengths of diverse models.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Paris 8
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678950606493710.1177/1056789506064937 ↗
2. 10.1177/105678950606493710.1177/1056789506064937 ↗
3. 10.1177/105678950809754210.1177/1056789508097542 ↗
4. 10.1177/10567895940030030110.1177/105678959400300301 ↗
5. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.332004210.1109/ACCESS.2023.3320042 ↗
6. 10.1186/2193-9772-3-810.1186/2193-9772-3-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.01710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.04.017 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1404079410.3390/ma14040794 ↗
9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.292390510.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923905 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10214110.1016/j.rineng.2024.102141 ↗
11. 10.3390/jcs710042010.3390/jcs7100420 ↗
12. 10.3390/technologies1104010110.3390/technologies11040101 ↗
13. 10.1515/comp-2022-207810.1515/comp-2022-2078 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11689010.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116890 ↗
15. Chadli M 2005. Modélisation de l’endommagement mésoscopique des polycristaux via de nouveaux critères d’amorçage local et global. PhD thésis Université de Technologie de Troyes.
16. 10.1115/1.185793910.1115/1.1857939 ↗
17. 10.1186/s13321-020-0417-910.1186/s13321-020-0417-9 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12541-019-00048-610.1007/s12541-019-00048-6 ↗
19. Da Silva D, Lockwood J, Liang W, et al. (2020a) Mean stress effect in stress-life for hard steels. International Journal of Fatigue 146(3): 106101.
20. Da Silva R, Ribeiro M, Moreni S, et al. (2020b) A novel decomposition-ensemble learning framework for multi-step ahead wind energy forecasting. Energy 216(1): 119174.
21. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.41010.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.410 ↗
22. Feng SZ, Han X, Li Z, et al. (2021) Ensemble learning for remaining fatigue life prediction of structures with stochastic parameters: A data-driven approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling 101(9): 420–431.
23. 10.22541/au.165237521.14489105/v110.22541/au.165237521.14489105/v1 ↗
24. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.337507210.1109/JSEN.2024.3375072 ↗
25. 10.1116/6.000278810.1116/6.0002788 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10699810.1016/j.ultras.2023.106998 ↗
27. 10.35377/saucis...122305410.35377/saucis...1223054 ↗
28. Guo R, Fu D, Sollazzo G (2021) An ensemble learning model for asphalt pavement performance prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 23(1): 3633–3646.
29. Gupta R, Yadav A, Jha S, et al. (2023) A robust regressor model for estimating solar radiation using an ensemble stacking approach based on machine learning. International Journal of Green Energy 21(1): 1853–1873.
30. 10.1186/s40537-020-00369-810.1186/s40537-020-00369-8 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.10477910.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104779 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.07310.1016/j.renene.2015.11.073 ↗
33. 10.1177/1056789522113495610.1177/10567895221134956 ↗
34. Iliou T, Anagnostopoulos C, Nerantzaki M, et al. (2015). A novel machine learning data preprocessing method for enhancing classification algorithms performance. In: Conference: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on engineering applications of neural networks (INNS), Greece.
35. 10.1109/TII.2023.324612410.1109/TII.2023.3246124 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12277810.1016/j.eswa.2023.122778 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.10720910.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107209 ↗
38. 10.1007/s41939-024-00457-910.1007/s41939-024-00457-9 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.12710.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.127 ↗
40. Kumari P, Toshniwal D (2020) Extreme gradient boosting and deep neural network based ensemble learning approach to forecast hourly solar irradiance. Journal of Cleaner Production 279(8): 123285.
41. 10.1023/A:102285900300610.1023/A:1022859003006 ↗
42. 10.1098/rsta.2022.038410.1098/rsta.2022.0384 ↗
43. 10.3390/met1404038110.3390/met14040381 ↗
44. 10.3390/sym1408158410.3390/sym14081584 ↗
45. Liu W, Chen Z, Hu Y (2022b) XGBoost algorithm-based prediction of safety assessment for pipelines. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 197(3): 104655.
46. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12616910.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126169 ↗
47. 10.1177/1056789523121547410.1177/10567895231215474 ↗
48. 10.3390/en1112328310.3390/en11123283 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.01.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.01.008 ↗
50. 10.2320/matertrans.MT-Z202300610.2320/matertrans.MT-Z2023006 ↗
51. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.319190710.1109/ACCESS.2022.3191907 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10905410.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109054 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10443710.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104437 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.mlwa.2023.10048310.1016/j.mlwa.2023.100483 ↗
55. 10.1613/jair.61410.1613/jair.614 ↗
56. 10.1080/19401493.2017.135491910.1080/19401493.2017.1354919 ↗
57. 10.1177/1056789524128241610.1177/10567895241282416 ↗
58. 10.1109/MCAS.2006.168819910.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199 ↗
59. 10.18280/ts.38050110.18280/ts.380501 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.01210.1016/j.engappai.2019.03.012 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.17710.1016/j.procs.2019.11.177 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10462-009-9124-710.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13270910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132709 ↗
64. 10.1002/adts.20200004810.1002/adts.202000048 ↗
65. Saidu M, Shagari S, Kabir M, et al. (2023) Improving university students’ data analysis outputs through effective data collection, cleaning, screening, and normalisation. Applied Quantitative Analysis (AQA) 3(2): 2023.
66. 10.3390/e2302020010.3390/e23020200 ↗
67. 10.1007/s10922-024-09813-z10.1007/s10922-024-09813-z ↗
68. 10.1016/j.imu.2019.10022810.1016/j.imu.2019.100228 ↗
69. 10.1111/ffe.1429110.1111/ffe.14291 ↗
70. 10.3390/applmech401001910.3390/applmech4010019 ↗
71. Sollich P, Krogh A (1996) Learning with ensembles: How over-fitting can be useful. In: Touretzky DS, Mozer MC, Hasselmo ME (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, Denver, CO. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.190–196.
72. 10.3390/app1219976610.3390/app12199766 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.ast.2024.10910110.1016/j.ast.2024.109101 ↗
74. 10.1080/15435075.2021.188190210.1080/15435075.2021.1881902 ↗
75. 10.32604/cmes.2024.04756910.32604/cmes.2024.047569 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.08510.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.085 ↗
77. 10.3233/JIFS-23642210.3233/JIFS-236422 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.07910.1016/j.rser.2016.10.079 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.08510.1016/j.enbuild.2017.10.085 ↗
80. 10.3390/app13211204810.3390/app132112048 ↗
81. 10.3390/app12201025210.3390/app122010252 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.10829010.1016/j.knosys.2022.108290 ↗
83. 10.1007/s10853-020-05091-710.1007/s10853-020-05091-7 ↗
84. 10.1016/B978-0-12-811654-8.00004-X10.1016/B978-0-12-811654-8.00004-X ↗
85. Yangtao L, Bao T, Jian G, et al. (2020) The prediction of dam displacement time series using STL, extra-trees, and stacked LSTM neural network. IEEE Access 8(99): 94440–94452.
86. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Yintang W, et al. (2023a) An improved stacking ensemble learning model for predicting the effect of lattice structure defects on yield stress. Computers in Industry 151(4): 103986.
87. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Yintang W, et al. (2023b) Data-driven XGBoost model for maximum stress prediction of additive manufactured lattice structures. Complex & Intelligent Systems 9(36): 5881–5892.