A five-dimensional digital twin model of bogie frame with a new approach for accumulation fatigue damage
Source abstract
Abstract
The fatigue failure of the rail vehicle bogie frame is primarily attributed to nonlinear fatigue damage under complex loading conditions. As one of the key technologies for promoting digitization in the field of rail transport, the related studies focusing on nonlinear fatigue damage assessment of the bogie frame based on a digital twin are being developed. In response to this case, a five-dimensional digital twin model of the bogie frame with a new approach for accumulation fatigue damage is established. To enhance the accuracy of the fatigue damage assessment in the digital twin model, an improved Manson–Halford nonlinear cumulative analytical model is presented based on the analogy between the decomposition of organic matter in ecology and the degradation of mechanical properties of materials. Additionally, to boost the efficiency of mapping between the physical entity and the virtual entity based on physical programming and particle swarm optimization. The proposed digital twin model uniquely merges data-driven and mechanics-driven methodologies, offering a robust solution for the structural design and durability optimization of the bogie frame.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Zhan Tianyou College (CRRC College), Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Key Laboratory of Railway Industry on Safety Service Key Technologies for High-Speed Train, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
CRRC Tangshan Co., Ltd
Funding
The Science and Technology Research and Development Programme Project of China National Railway Administration Group
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.10794510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107945 ↗
2. EN13749. (2005) Railway applications-methods of specifying structural requirements of bogie frames. European Committee for Standardization.
3. 10.11128/sne.31.tn.1057210.11128/sne.31.tn.10572 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10639310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106393 ↗
5. Gieves M, Vickers J (2017) Digital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex System. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
6. Haghgouei H, Baghbanan A, Hashemolhosseini H, et al. (2020) Variable amplitude fatigue life prediction of rock samples under completely reversed loading. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Materials Structures 43(8): 1880–1892.
7. Hu X, Li Q, Wu Z, et al. (2020) Modelling fracture process zone width and length for quasi-brittle fracture of rock, concrete and ceramics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 259(11): 108158–108171.
8. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11136910.1016/j.measurement.2022.111369 ↗
9. JISE4207. (2004) Truck frames f railway rolling stock-general rules for design. Japanese Industrial Standards Committee.
10. 10.1115/1.322577510.1115/1.3225775 ↗
11. Li H, Liu Y, He X, et al. (2021) New nonlinear cumulative fatigue damage model based on ecological quality dissipation of materials. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 10(4): 1–11.
12. 10.1007/s42243-018-0157-510.1007/s42243-018-0157-5 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.401492210.1115/1.4014922 ↗
14. Messac A, Hattis P (1995) High speed civil transport (HSCT) plane design using physical programming. 36th Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 13: 2018–2031.
15. 10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-610.1016/S0013-7944(02)00034-6 ↗
16. 10.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-2-91-9910.21780/2223-9731-2021-80-2-91-99 ↗
17. 10.1177/0954409722109498610.1177/09544097221094986 ↗
18. 10.1109/ICMLC.2004.138217110.1109/ICMLC.2004.1382171 ↗
19. 10.1631/jzus.A220012710.1631/jzus.A2200127 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.344338310.1115/1.3443383 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.05510.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055 ↗
22. Tao F, Liu W, Zhang M, et al. (2019) Five-dimension digital twin model and its ten applications. Computer Integrated Manufacturing System 25(1): 1–18.
23. TB/T3548. (2019) Strength design and test accreditation specification for rolling stock. National Railway Administration of China.
24. UIC515-4. (1993) Passenger rolling stock-trailer bogies and running gear-bogie frame structure strength tests. International Union of Railways.
25. UIC615-4. (2003) Motive power units-bogies and running gear-bogie frame structure strength tests. International Union of Railways.
26. 10.1016/j.renene.2024.12008610.1016/j.renene.2024.120086 ↗
27. Ye D (1999) A new approach for studying fatigue damage. Journal of Experimental Mechanics 14(1): 80–88.
28. 10.1177/105678951454422810.1177/1056789514544228 ↗
29. 10.1111/ffe.1324610.1111/ffe.13246 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10663610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106636 ↗
31. 10.1007/s00158-024-03806-x10.1007/s00158-024-03806-x ↗