Normalization of fatigue crack growth data in AISI H11 tool steel at room and elevated temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
The fatigue crack growth rate of materials is shown to be dependent on the testing conditions like load ratio R and testing temperature. Great interest exists in normalizing this data onto a single curve. In this research, some methods commonly used to normalize the effect of R ratio are tested on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR) curves of AISI H11 tool steel. These methods are based on either purely mathematical relations or on the effect of crack closure in variable R ratio tests. A model based on the crack tip opening displacement measurements to normalize the effect of R ratio as well as temperature is also used. This model takes into account the material-hardening coefficient, yield stress, Young’s modulus, and the crack tip opening displacement measurements. Crack tip opening displacement measurements have also been directly used to characterize the FCGR. A method is presented to find out crack closure as well as crack tip opening displacement using 2D digital image correlation measurements near the crack tip. At the end, a critical analysis of the four normalization techniques is presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan
INSA, UPS, EMAC, ISAE; ICA (Institut Clément Ader), Université de Toulouse, Toulouse Cedex 4, France
INSA, UPS, Mines Albi, ISAE; ICA (Institut Clément Ader), Université de Toulouse, Albi, France
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson WE DD (1961) Crack propagation behavior of some airframe materials. Crack Propagation Symposium . Cranfield, England, p. 375.
2. 10.1177/105678950910348210.1177/1056789509103482 ↗
3. Bowles C (1978) The role of environment, frequency, and shape during fatigue crack growth in aluminum alloys. Doctoral Dissertation . Delft University.
4. 10.1007/BF0003890210.1007/BF00038902 ↗
5. 10.1016/0013-7944(91)90018-V10.1016/0013-7944(91)90018-V ↗
6. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00024-810.1016/S0142-1123(97)00024-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00055-910.1016/S0142-1123(99)00055-9 ↗
8. Dowling NE (1976) Geometry effects and the J-integral approach to elastic-plastic fatigue crack growth. ASTM STP 601: 19–32.10.1520/STP28635S ↗
9. 10.1520/STP33940S10.1520/STP33940S ↗
10. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-710.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
11. Hertzberg RW · 1996
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.07.009 ↗
13. 10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
14. Hamam R (2006) Simulation de la propagation des fissures par fatigue dans les toiles des roues de train sous chargement à amplitude variable. Cachan, France: École normale supérieure de Cachan-ENS Cachan, p. 237 (PhD Thesis).
15. 10.1016/0022-5096(68)90021-510.1016/0022-5096(68)90021-5 ↗
16. 10.1111/ffe.1215310.1111/ffe.12153 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00158-X10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00158-X ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00085-210.1016/S0142-1123(00)00085-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-810.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.13010.1016/j.msea.2006.08.130 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.01310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.013 ↗
22. 10.1080/1478643620821267410.1080/14786436208212674 ↗
23. McClintock FA · Fracture: An Advanced Treatise · 1971 · 3 · 47
24. 10.1016/0022-5096(77)90003-510.1016/0022-5096(77)90003-5 ↗
25. McMeeking RM · ASTM STP · 1979 · 668 · 175
26. Metzger M · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · 2014 · DOI: 10.1016/j.
27. 10.1016/0001-6160(74)90071-610.1016/0001-6160(74)90071-6 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.02910.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.029 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-710.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-7 ↗
31. 10.1016/0013-7944(70)90008-110.1016/0013-7944(70)90008-1 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.360120610.1115/1.3601206 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0003890310.1007/BF00038903 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
35. 10.1016/0013-7944(79)90031-610.1016/0013-7944(79)90031-6 ↗
36. Sadanada S and Shahinian P (1980) Elastic-plastic fracture mechanics for high temperature fatigue crack growth. Fracture Mechanics: Twelfth Conference, ASTM STP 700 , pp. 152–163.10.1520/STP36969S ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.008 ↗
38. Shah M · Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English letters) · 2012 · 25 · 307
39. Shah SMR · 2010
40. 10.1016/0022-5096(81)90003-X10.1016/0022-5096(81)90003-X ↗
41. 10.1007/BF0003429410.1007/BF00034294 ↗
42. Shih CF · ASTM STP · 1979 · 668 · 65
43. Shih CF · International Journal of Fracture · 1981 · 17 · 2710.1007/BF00043119 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00099-710.1016/S0013-7944(03)00099-7 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.03810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.038 ↗
46. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
47. Tada H · 1985
48. Tracey DM · (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1976) ASME, Transactions, Series H- Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology · 1976 · 98 · 146
49. Walker K (1970) The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum. Effects of Environment and Complex Loading History on Fatigue Life. ASTM STP 462: 1–14.10.1520/STP32032S ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.04.00110.1016/j.msea.2003.04.001 ↗
51. 10.1007/s11661-008-9631-110.1007/s11661-008-9631-1 ↗