A particular criterion for progressive failure analysis of carbon/phenolic tape-wounded conic shells
Source abstract
Abstract
Conic shell structures are widely used in aerospace industries. In the literature various models have been proposed to failure analysis of composite materials. Clearly, each model has a favorable range of applications. In this paper tensile, compressive, shear and thermal expansion properties of tape-wounded Carbon/Phenolic composites are firstly measured at various temperatures in range 23–200°C. The captured properties are then taken into account to progressive failure analysis of a conic Carbon/Phenolic structure under internal pressure and thermal loadings. For this end, a particular failure criterion is proposed to predict failure in the composite structures with a reasonable margin of safety. The enhanced model is then implemented into the commercial finite element software of ABAQUS via a developed user material (UMAT) subroutine utilizing a suitable solution algorithm. Advantages of the model are assessed and comparisons with other failure criteria as well as experiment are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Polymer crystallization and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aerospace Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/105678952092155110.1177/1056789520921551 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.05410.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.054 ↗
3. Almeida JHS Jr, Staudigel C, Caetano GLP, et al. (2014), Engineering properties of carbon/epoxy filament wound unidirectional composites. In: ECCM16 – 16th European conference on composite materials , Seville, Spain.
4. ASTM D5379/D5379M-12 · 2012
5. ASTM D3410/D3410M-16 · 2016
6. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17 · 2017
7. ASTM E831-14 · 2014
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.01710.1016/j.compstruct.2008.05.017 ↗
9. 10.1177/105678951771508810.1177/1056789517715088 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.301382210.1115/1.3013822 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.00810.1016/j.commatsci.2005.01.008 ↗
12. 10.1023/A:101386822808010.1023/A:1013868228080 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.315366410.1115/1.3153664 ↗
14. Hill R (1950) The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Jones RM (1999) Mechanics of Composite Materials. 2nd ed. Oxforshire, UK: Taylor & Francis.
16. 10.1177/105678951558143310.1177/1056789515581433 ↗
17. Kastenmeier A · Journal of Technology and Engineering · 2016 · 4
18. 10.1177/105678951984362210.1177/1056789519843622 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.02910.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.029 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.02010.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.020 ↗
22. 10.1177/105678951990129410.1177/1056789519901294 ↗
23. 10.1016/0020-7462(94)00041-810.1016/0020-7462(94)00041-8 ↗
24. Tsai SW (1968) Strength theories of filamentary structures fundamental aspects of fiber reinforced plastic composite materials. In: Conference proceedings , Dayton, Ohio, pp.3–11. New York: Wiley Interscience.
25. 10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00137-910.1016/S0263-8223(00)00137-9 ↗
26. Yamada SE and Sun CT(1987) Analysis of Laminate Strength and its Distribution. Journal of Composite Materials 12: 275-284.10.1177/002199837801200305 ↗