journal article·2018-01Open access

Experimentally quantified and computational anisotropic damage rules for flax fabric composites

SM Panamoottil, R Das, K Jayaraman

Abstract

Continuum damage mechanics models have been used for predicting failure in composites for several years now. However, their application to natural fibre composites is quite recent. In this work, an approach for evaluating damage processes in natural fibre composite has been developed by combining experimentally quantified damage rules with discrete representations of fabric geometry. This approach is demonstrated by predicting the tensile failure of both thermoplastic-based and thermoset-based flax fabric composites. Numerical models have been developed to estimate the damage rules from the fibre, matrix and interface properties incorporated into representative volume element (RVE) models of the composites. While both the experimentally quantified and numerically obtained sets of damage rules yield satisfactory predictions, the use of these numerical rules leads to predictions that are close to, and in some cases, better than those obtained from the quantified rules.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Advanced Composite Materials, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Sir Lawrence Wackett Aerospace Research Centre, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.006 ↗
2. Biotex (2014) Biotex flax – composites evolution. Available at: www.compositesevolution.com/Products/Biotex/BiotexFlax.aspx (accessed 23 December 2014).
3. 10.1023/A:100465012689010.1023/A:1004650126890 ↗
4. 10.1177/089270570935633810.1177/0892705709356338 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.proeng.2009.06.05510.1016/j.proeng.2009.06.055 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.02210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.09.022 ↗
7. Corp DSS · 2012
8. DaimlerChrysler (2001) Environmental report 2001: Facts and figures. Technical report, DaimlerChrysler.
9. D’Errico J (2012) Inhull. Available at: www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/10226-inhull (accessed 29 May 2015).
10. 10.1002/mame.20130000810.1002/mame.201300008 ↗
11. Gan JM (2011) Modelling the initiation and evolution of damage within GFRP by including real geometric variability. In: 18th international conference on composite materials , Jeju Island, Korea.
12. 10.1115/1.301382210.1115/1.3013822 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.197910.1002/app.1979 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00182-310.1016/S1359-835X(02)00182-3 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11837-006-0234-210.1007/s11837-006-0234-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2005.12.013 ↗
17. International A (2007a) D4255 standard test method for in-plane shear properties of polymer matrix composite materials by the rail shear method. ASTM International testing standard.
18. International A (2007b) D6798 terminology relating to flax and linen. ASTM International testing standard.
19. International A (2008a) C1557 standard test method for tensile strength and Young’s modulus of fibers. ASTM International testing standard.
20. International A (2008b) D3039 standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International testing standard.
21. International A (2009a) D6961 test method for color measurement of flax fiber. ASTM International testing standard.
22. International A (2009b) D7025 test method for assessing clean flax fiber fineness. ASTM International testing standard.
23. International A (2010) D7076 test method for measurement of shives in retted flax. ASTM International testing standard.
24. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P, et al. (2001–) Scipy: Open source scientific tools for Python. Available at: www.scipy.org/ (accessed 19 September 2015).
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.018 ↗
26. 10.1002/9783527674220.ch1310.1002/9783527674220.ch13 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.017 ↗
28. Min P (2015) Meshconv 3D model converter, convert to and from VRML, DXF, OBJ, OFF, PLY, and STL. Available at: http://www.patrickmin.com/meshconv/ (accessed 18 June 2015).
29. 10.1177/105678951557390010.1177/1056789515573900 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2345310.1002/pc.23453 ↗
31. 10.1115/1.364171910.1115/1.3641719 ↗
32. 10.1002/zamm.1929009010410.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
34. 10.1177/002199831244073710.1177/0021998312440737 ↗
35. Sherburn M (2007) Geometric and mechanical modelling of textiles . PhD Thesis, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
36. 10.1201/9780203508206.ch710.1201/9780203508206.ch7 ↗
37. Swery EE · Journal of Composite Materials · 2015
38. 10.1177/10567895950040040310.1177/105678959500400403 ↗
39. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00211-710.1016/S0266-3538(02)00211-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.002 ↗