Length effect on creep of silicon cantilever microbeams
Source abstract
Abstract
Creep behavior is very important to reliability of micromechanical components. Therefore, there are some emerging research efforts that focus on creep of silicon. However, few have focused on interaction among microscale dimension effect, temperature, and applied stress, which are more crucial to microelectrical mechanical system components compared with regular size components. This paper presents investigation of creep of single crystal silicon cantilever microbeams with a specific focus on the length effect. Results are presented characterizing the creep behavior in the length range of 300–700 µm, the temperature range of 600–700℃, and the stress range of 235–501 MPa. As the temperature or stress increases, the creep rate of silicon increases and duration of the steady-state creep decreases. Creep rate decreases with the increase of microbeam length. At 600℃, creep rupture lifetime approximately increases with the increase of microbeam length. At 700℃, maximum lifetime shifts to medium length of 400 µm. Factors that influence rupture lifetime include short beam effect, defect distribution, stress, temperature, and brittleness caused by oxidation. To summarize, creep failure modes for short beam and long beam are, respectively, dislocation motion by multiple slip systems and single slip system.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Mechanical and Optical Resonators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Computer Aided Engineering, Feng-Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102636932021510.1023/A:1026369320215 ↗
2. Callister WD Jr and Rethwisch DG (2010) Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction . 8th ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
3. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.01110.1016/j.sna.2009.03.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sna.2007.06.02910.1016/j.sna.2007.06.029 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.measurement.2007.12.00710.1016/j.measurement.2007.12.007 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0026-2714(03)00119-710.1016/S0026-2714(03)00119-7 ↗
7. Nakao S, Ando T, Shikida M, et al. (2005) Changes in mechanical properties of micron-size single crystal silicon film at high temperature. In: The 13th international conference on solid-state sensors, actuators and microsystems , IEEE, Seoul, South Korea, June 2005, pp.1961–1964.10.1109/SENSOR.2005.1497484 ↗
8. 10.1088/0960-1317/16/4/00710.1088/0960-1317/16/4/007 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2011.04.01410.1016/j.sna.2011.04.014 ↗
10. Paryab N, Jahed H and Khajepour A (2006) Failure mechanisms of MEMS thermal actuators. In: Proceedings of 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems Division, MEMS, Chicago, IL, IMECE2006-15128 pp. 397–406.10.1115/IMECE2006-15128 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mee.2009.12.00110.1016/j.mee.2009.12.001 ↗
12. Richerson DW (1982) Modern Ceramic Enigineering: Properties, Processing, and Use in Design . Marcel Dekker Inc., Chapter 4.
13. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00716-610.1016/S0924-4247(01)00716-6 ↗
14. Spearing SM (2008) High power density MEMS: Materials and structures requirements. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications , IUTAM Bookseries 7; 3–13, IUTAM Symposium on Flow Control and MEMS—Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium , Imperial College, London, England.10.1007/978-1-4020-6858-4_1 ↗
15. 10.1016/0025-5416(72)90073-010.1016/0025-5416(72)90073-0 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.183921410.1115/1.1839214 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00428-510.1016/S1359-6462(99)00428-5 ↗
18. 10.1177/105678951143278910.1177/1056789511432789 ↗